Message from discussion
CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:43:54 -0800 (PST)
From: entot <ento.ento...@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <d509d495-e481-46e4-9557-3aca44b47d93@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <50AA2215.3030502@gmx.de>
References: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com> <20121116164912.GH25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de> <CAMKwHj00ZfuP_S5fsWC2RacXTbzJa4X3=vkxKF2E_r23p8Jryw@mail.gmail.com>
<50AA2215.3030502@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current
situation?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_61_19955344.1353350634826"
------=_Part_61_19955344.1353350634826
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_62_27621188.1353350634828"
------=_Part_62_27621188.1353350634828
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12:09 PM UTC+9, selpa'i wrote:
> > Of course it is. That's why it's so important that the CLL1.1 is
> > finished. [snip]
>
> Yes, very useful and desirable. I again welcome anyone who is willing to
> help to speak up and accept our money.
>
I'm willing to help without any money. I'm satisfied with just having my
name on the contributors list, so give me any only if you run out of people
who accepts money.
I can use about up to 8 hours per week. Also there's an upcoming month-long
vacation around December, which will allow me to spend about 24 hours per
week.
Several months ago, I went as far as setting up a local build environment,
but wasn't motivated enough to read through the TODO file then.
Is there a goal statement for CLL1.1 which I can evaluate my (our) work
against? Something like "be able to produce the book in .pdf, .mobi, .epub,
.html (chunked, not-chunked) with a readable layout"?
mu'o
------=_Part_62_27621188.1353350634828
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12:09 PM UTC+9, selpa'i wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">> Of course it is. That's why it's so important that the CLL1.1 is
<br>> finished. [snip]<br><br>Yes, very useful and desirable. I again welcome anyone who is willing to
<br>help to speak up and accept our money.
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm willing to help without any money. I'm satisfied with just having my name on the contributors list, so give me any only if you run out of people who accepts money.</div><div><br></div><div>I can use about up to 8 hours per week. Also there's an upcoming month-long vacation around December, which will allow me to spend about 24 hours per week.</div><div><br></div><div>Several months ago, I went as far as setting up a local build environment, but wasn't motivated enough to read through the TODO file then.</div><div><br></div><div>Is there a goal statement for CLL1.1 which I can evaluate my (our) work against? Something like "be able to produce the book in .pdf, .mobi, .epub, .html (chunked, not-chunked) with a readable layout"?</div><div><br></div><div>mu'o</div>
------=_Part_62_27621188.1353350634828--
------=_Part_61_19955344.1353350634826--