Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
lojban
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
selpa'i  
View profile  
 More options Nov 18 2012, 3:56 pm
From: selpa'i <sela...@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:54:09 +0100
Local: Sun, Nov 18 2012 3:54 pm
Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Am 18.11.2012 21:21, schrieb And Rosta:

> selpa'i, On 18/11/2012 19:30:
>> The only way for this to be a useful idea is to have enough people of
>> the old BPFK team coming together and finishing off the remaining
>> issues (of which there are of course quite a few).

> Why the old BPFK team? There seem to be active newcomers such as you and
> Jacob Errington who understand the issues and would have been on the
> BPFK had you been around ten years ago. I was on the original BPFK team,
> but nowadays I wouldn't have the time or commitment to do more than vote
> on already worked-out proposals -- i.e. not for working-out and debating
> proposals. Far better chances of progress if the job is given to the
> likes of you and Jacob. (I should add that I have no idea who either of
> you are; I just observe that you both post clueful messages to Lojban
> list.)

You're right, of course it would have to be a team of active members,
but we don't need to create a new "taskforce", we can still call them
the BPFK, just with a different list of people. I am hoping at least
some of the old members are still available and willing to help out. We
need people like xorxes.

I certainly want to be on the BPFK team (or on whatever team that makes
decisions together) and I asked rlpowell if I could become a member some
time ago, but he told me there was no use in that, since it was
basically a dead committee.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

doị mèlbi mlenì'u
    .i do càtlu ki'u
ma fe la xàmpre ŭu
    .i do tìnsa càrmi
gi'e sìrji se tàrmi
    .i taị bo pu cìtka lo gràna ku

.

.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google