Received: by 10.182.7.74 with SMTP id h10mr983769oba.24.1353351133180;
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:52:13 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.182.182.97 with SMTP id ed1ls602726obc.51.gmail; Mon, 19 Nov
 2012 10:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.248.34 with SMTP id yj2mr3195358pbc.2.1353351131535;
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.248.34 with SMTP id yj2mr3195357pbc.2.1353351131525;
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org>
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id yl8si1713476pbc.1.2012.11.19.10.52.11
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1TaWS2-0000i8-Qq
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:52:11 -0800
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:52:10 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current
 situation?
Message-ID: <20121119185210.GM28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com>
 <20121116164912.GH25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com>
 <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com>
 <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <50A9375D.5060...@gmx.de>
 <CAMKwHj00ZfuP_S5fsWC2RacXTbzJa4X3=vkxKF2E_r23p8J...@mail.gmail.com>
 <50AA2215.3030...@gmx.de>
 <d509d495-e481-46e4-9557-3aca44b47d93@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d509d495-e481-46e4-9557-3aca44b47d93@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:43:54AM -0800, entot wrote:
> On Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12:09 PM UTC+9, selpa'i wrote:
> 
> > > Of course it is. That's why it's so important that the CLL1.1
> > > is finished. [snip]
> >
> > Yes, very useful and desirable. I again welcome anyone who is
> > willing to help to speak up and accept our money. 
> >
> 
> I'm willing to help without any money. I'm satisfied with just
> having my name on the contributors list, so give me any only if
> you run out of people who accepts money.
> 
> I can use about up to 8 hours per week. Also there's an upcoming
> month-long vacation around December, which will allow me to spend
> about 24 hours per week.
> 
> Several months ago, I went as far as setting up a local build
> environment, but wasn't motivated enough to read through the TODO
> file then.

I *strongly* reccomend getting an account on vrici (one of my shell
servers) rather than trying to set it up yourself; it's just a bear
to get working properly.  Come find me on IRC and I can hook you up.

> Is there a goal statement for CLL1.1 which I can evaluate my (our)
> work against? Something like "be able to produce the book in .pdf,
> .mobi, .epub, .html (chunked, not-chunked) with a readable
> layout"?

*Exactly* that.  Exactly what you said, without alteration.  The
only clarification I'd make is importance: PDF > HTML > everything
else.  Oh, and that the PDF needs to be something we can send to a
printer to make a book out of, so (in particular) cross references
need to be page number based (which is why we can't just print the
HTML, or anything converted from it; I haven't found anything that
produces page number xrefs from html, much as I'd *LOVE* to solve
the whole thing that way).

-Robin