An inquiry regarding LaTeX and the CLL

17 views
Skip to first unread message

selpa'i

unread,
May 10, 2013, 5:09:33 PM5/10/13
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Hello everyone.

You probably know that there has been an effort to create a new CLL:

Robin:
>> Is there a goal statement for CLL1.1 which I can evaluate my (our)
>> work against? Something like "be able to produce the book in .pdf,
>> .mobi, .epub, .html (chunked, not-chunked) with a readable
>> layout"?
>
> *Exactly* that. Exactly what you said, without alteration. The
> only clarification I'd make is importance: PDF > HTML > everything
> else. Oh, and that the PDF needs to be something we can send to a
> printer to make a book out of, so (in particular) cross references
> need to be page number based (which is why we can't just print the
> HTML, or anything converted from it; I haven't found anything that
> produces page number xrefs from html, much as I'd *LOVE* to solve
> the whole thing that way).

The project isn't going anywhere at the moment. Nobody is helping as far
as I know (I'd be glad to be wrong).

So here is a question:

Would there be more people capable and willing to help out if Robin
converted what is currently there to *LaTeX* (from docbook), so that you
don't even have to worry about docbook anymore? We really need to move
this forward, so please speak up.

Who on this list can use LaTeX well enough and would be willing to help
with the CLL?

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

v4hn

unread,
May 10, 2013, 7:07:38 PM5/10/13
to loj...@googlegroups.com
coi rodo

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:09:33PM +0200, selpa'i wrote:
> The project isn't going anywhere at the moment. Nobody is helping as
> far as I know (I'd be glad to be wrong).

Sadly this seems to be the case. Although, if you look at the list of
pull requests[0], there are quite a number of them which never were pulled or
rejected.. So it's also about missing administration of the project and
not just about missing contributions.

> Would there be more people capable and willing to help out if Robin
> converted what is currently there to *LaTeX* (from docbook), so that
> you don't even have to worry about docbook anymore? We really need
> to move this forward, so please speak up.
>
> Who on this list can use LaTeX well enough and would be willing to
> help with the CLL?

I'm not sure this helps at all. At the moment, I'm not helping out,
because everything else in my life keeps me too busy to do that and
not because I have problems with the source language.
I'm rather sure I'm not the only one with that reasoning.

Whether the source of the CLL is docbook or LaTeX doesn't matter to me.
Semantic markup with docbook is nice to have, but if it helps someone
who would really contribute something essential, plain LaTeX sure is fine.


v4hn

---
[0] - https://github.com/dag/cll/pulls

Robin Lee Powell

unread,
May 10, 2013, 7:44:13 PM5/10/13
to loj...@googlegroups.com
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 01:07:38AM +0200, v4hn wrote:
> coi rodo
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:09:33PM +0200, selpa'i wrote:
> > The project isn't going anywhere at the moment. Nobody is
> > helping as far as I know (I'd be glad to be wrong).
>
> Sadly this seems to be the case. Although, if you look at the list
> of pull requests[0], there are quite a number of them which never
> were pulled or rejected.. So it's also about missing
> administration of the project and not just about missing
> contributions.

Yeah, I'm sorry about that, hoping to get to them soon.

Having said that, what's in the pull requests seems like a fairly
minor portion of the available work.

-Robin
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages