Some of you might remember one attempt of mine on the time/space
cmavo: http://jbotcan.org/ideas/src/1254854442265.pdf
(that was intended to be printed on the two sides of an A4 sheet and
then folded as a booklet).
I've now tried a different approach creating a "periodic table of
pro-sumti and pro-bridi":
http://jbotcan.org/ideas/src/1286574078318.pdf
should it prove useful I'll try with other periodic tables (e.g. the
table of modals!).
Different people learn using different strategies and what is a good
visual representation for me, could be completely misleading for
others!
So this may or may not be helpful for you. I just post it in case
someone alse might benefit of it.
Suggestions, corrections and feedback are always very welcome.
remo.d
That's cute. :)
You have a typo: "coi" should be "cei".
mu'o mi'e xorxes
You could scale and print that PDF on a A3 sheet or even larger and
you should not notice any scaling effect. I can surely produce a png
for that but that would be much bigger and not better resolution-wise.
> Why do you have {ti ta tu} but not {vi va vu}?
My understanding is that {vi} {va} and {vu} are space/time cmavo and
are not valid as pro-sumti. When we say {le vi plise}, I'm really
saying "the apple that is here close to me" rather than "this apple".
Am I wrong?
> Why are it-6 to it-10 {fo'a - fo'u} above it-1 to it-5 {ko'a - ko'u}?
No specific reason, I can easily swap them.
> I thought {du} was a pro-bridi?
I'm not sure. I initially hadn't it at all, I probably should
understand it better. I know see it as just meaning "is the same of".
Thanks.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:You could scale and print that PDF on a A3 sheet or even larger and
>
> It's interesting. Due to the nature of the presentation, I don't think na
> pdf is the right format, unless you are capable of changing the page size.
> Even then, I'd opt for a high-res png, or other picture format.
you should not notice any scaling effect. I can surely produce a png
for that but that would be much bigger and not better resolution-wise.
> Why do you have {ti ta tu} but not {vi va vu}?My understanding is that {vi} {va} and {vu} are space/time cmavo and
are not valid as pro-sumti. When we say {le vi plise}, I'm really
saying "the apple that is here close to me" rather than "this apple".
Am I wrong?
No specific reason, I can easily swap them.
> Why are it-6 to it-10 {fo'a - fo'u} above it-1 to it-5 {ko'a - ko'u}?
I'm not sure. I initially hadn't it at all, I probably should
> I thought {du} was a pro-bridi?
understand it better. I know see it as just meaning "is the same of".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Remo Dentato <rden...@gmail.com> wrote:On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:You could scale and print that PDF on a A3 sheet or even larger and
>
> It's interesting. Due to the nature of the presentation, I don't think na
> pdf is the right format, unless you are capable of changing the page size.
> Even then, I'd opt for a high-res png, or other picture format.
you should not notice any scaling effect. I can surely produce a png
for that but that would be much bigger and not better resolution-wise.
Well, I meant for people like me who prefer the digital version. (I like trees. Printing means using paper. Using paper means less trees.)
Then again, the best format for use is probably html....
> Why do you have {ti ta tu} but not {vi va vu}?My understanding is that {vi} {va} and {vu} are space/time cmavo and
are not valid as pro-sumti. When we say {le vi plise}, I'm really
saying "the apple that is here close to me" rather than "this apple".
Am I wrong?
No specific reason, I can easily swap them.
> Why are it-6 to it-10 {fo'a - fo'u} above it-1 to it-5 {ko'a - ko'u}?
I'm not sure. I initially hadn't it at all, I probably should
> I thought {du} was a pro-bridi?
understand it better. I know see it as just meaning "is the same of".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
I suggest SVG, which is a vector format. PNG would have stairsteps or blurs on
the letters.
> Why do you have {ti ta tu} but not {vi va vu}?
{vi va vu} are tense markers.
> Why are it-6 to it-10 {fo'a - fo'u} above it-1 to it-5 {ko'a - ko'u}?
>
> I thought {du} was a pro-bridi?
It's in the same selma'o, so it should have the same color. Also "zi'o" is a
pro-sumti, but is colored like an operator.
Also "brodi" appears thrice.
Pierre
--
lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko
On Friday 08 October 2010 18:17:52 Jonathan Jones wrote:I suggest SVG, which is a vector format. PNG would have stairsteps or blurs on
> It's interesting. Due to the nature of the presentation, I don't think na
> pdf is the right format, unless you are capable of changing the page size.
> Even then, I'd opt for a high-res png, or other picture format.
the letters.
> Why do you have {ti ta tu} but not {vi va vu}?{vi va vu} are tense markers.
It's in the same selma'o, so it should have the same color. Also "zi'o" is a
> Why are it-6 to it-10 {fo'a - fo'u} above it-1 to it-5 {ko'a - ko'u}?
>
> I thought {du} was a pro-bridi?
pro-sumti, but is colored like an operator.
Also "brodi" appears thrice.
Pierre
--
lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>> I thought {du} was a pro-bridi?
>
> It's in the same selma'o, so it should have the same color. Also "zi'o" is a
> pro-sumti, but is colored like an operator.
I'm not just grouping by slema'o or I would get any more help.
My understanding is {zi'o} is special in that when used it does not
represent a sumti, rather it cancel the sumti places modifying the
meaning of the brivla itself. If I got {zi'o} correctly, if I say
{zi'o klama xyboi zy.} I'm not saying that "nobody is going to x from
y" but "there's a path to x from y". Hence it's not colored as other
pro-sumti.
{du} is different. I understand it as a brivla. I can't get why it has
been defined as a cmavo.
> Also "brodi" appears thrice.
FIxed! thanks
Remo
Now the next question would be: should I add it to the lojban.org
material or should I make it live on jbotcan?
remo
And, very very nice. I like it a lot.
-Alan
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
--
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi
Ok, I created a separate "cheat sheets" page and also put a link from
the "books" section:
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=jbo_cheat_sheet
Hope that others will share theirs.
Remo
...Agh. "A word is a selbri." I know there aren't many ways of saying that better, but I still cringe a bit at that.Also, why IS {du} in GOhA? Why is it even a cmavo?
Also, a few more typos:{bu'a} and friends are numbered wrong.{ma} has "simti" instead of "sumti"Nice, by the way.mu'o mi'e latros.--On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Lindar <lindar...@yahoo.com> wrote:du means "x1 is exactly the same thing as x2"
Not like "this apple is exactly the same as that apple", but "Jeff's
apple is the same as this apple." x1 and x2 of {du} are one and the
same object/person/thing/idea. I believe it's derived from dunli,
which is where 1 and 2 are similar objects and x3 is the similar
trait. If there was anything in Lojban that was like "is", {du} would
probably be it (in the sense of "Mr. Jingle is Jeff's bird." OSLT).
So... not pro-bridi, it's an actual selbri.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
Any time you get tired of Lojlish for talking about Lojban, English is still available and the technical jargons of linguistics, logic and programming are relatively straightforward -- and adaptable.
I asked that myself, it is clearly not a pro-bridi since it as a
definite and invariable meaning.
Initially I hadn't it in the table at all, then I had it in a
different color and then I colored it as the other GOhA.
After all the table it's just a mnemonic tool. If it helps to remember
that {du} has the form of a cmavo but it's actually something else, it
will serve its purpose
> Also, a few more typos:
> {bu'a} and friends are numbered wrong.
> {ma} has "simti" instead of "sumti"
Thanks. Going to fix them
Okay, can we list the proper English terms for talking about Lojban?
The "hyphen letter" is an interfix, whether used in a type-3 fu'ivla or a
lujvo.
A "modal" is a preposition. I call BAI proper prepositions, as distinct from
tense markers which can also be prepositions. "do'e", however, is a proper
preposition but not a "modal", as it is not derived from a brivla (though you
could say it means "fi'o co'e").
"ka'e" and "ca'a" are modals (as the term is used in other languages).
I don't think it's possible to completely avoid using Lojban terminology when
describing Lojban grammar, just as one can't describe Hebrew grammar without
using words like "niph`al" (or "N-stem", but the "N" is still a Hebrew
prefix). But we can use standard linguistic terminology for a lot of it.
Pierre
--
The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain.
----- Original Message ----
From: Pierre Abbat <ph...@phma.optus.nu>
To: loj...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 10:55:32 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Learning cmavo
--
--gejyspa