Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Which Open Source license should Lit use?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Marcus Clearspring  
View profile  
 More options Jun 1 2012, 8:20 pm
From: Marcus Clearspring <wordi...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jun 1 2012 8:20 pm
Subject: Which Open Source license should Lit use?

There are pros and cons to all Open Source licenses. Which one should Lit
use?
Typical options:

GPL - the classic "share-alike" license
AGPL (Affero) - a tighter GPL which forces undistributed changes to also be
made public, e.g. changes used only inside a company
MIT or Apache - encourages commercial adoption

What do you think?

Marcus


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »