Blocking attached files
Ronan Lucio
Is there a way to block attachments for outbound messages
for only one account?
Thanks,
Ronan
Magnus Bäck
Ronan Lucio <ron...@videosoft.com.br> wrote:
> Is there a way to block attachments for outbound messages
> for only one account?
No, not without a content filter or milter that provides this service.
Also note that Postfix doesn't really have an account concept.
There are clients, sender addresses, recipient addresses,
and SASL users.
--
Magnus Bäck
mag...@dsek.lth.se
Octavio
--- Magnus Bäck <mag...@dsek.lth.se> escribió:
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/
Ronan Lucio
Thank you very much for your answer.
>> Is there a way to block attachments for outbound messages
>> for only one account?
>
> No, not without a content filter or milter that provides this service.
OK, and do you know about some content_filter that do it?
Preferable one that isn愒 Amavisd.
> Also note that Postfix doesn't really have an account concept.
> There are clients, sender addresses, recipient addresses,
> and SASL users.
And do you know a content_filter that can block attachment for
a specific sender? It悲 solve my problem.
Thank you,
Ronan
Magnus Bäck
Octavio <octavi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Magnus Bäck <mag...@dsek.lth.se> escribió:
>
> > No, not without a content filter or milter that provides this
> > service.
> >
> > Also note that Postfix doesn't really have an account concept.
> > There are clients, sender addresses, recipient addresses, and
> > SASL users.
>
> do you have any content filter? mailscanner?
MailScanner is not recommended for use with Postfix (read the archives).
amavisd-new is a popular choice that I believe provides banning of
filenames depending on the sender or recipient address.
Stop top-posting. Now.
--
Magnus Bäck
mag...@dsek.lth.se
Ronan Lucio
> do you have any content filter? mailscanner?
Yes. clamsmptd and policyd.
Thank you,
Ronan
Ronan Lucio
>
> amavisd-new is a popular choice that I believe provides banning of
> filenames depending on the sender or recipient address.
OK Magnus,
Thank you very much for you answer.
Ronan
Octavio
it is not recomended I have been using it with very
good results
Octavio
--- Magnus Bäck <mag...@dsek.lth.se> escribió:
> On Thursday, August 10, 2006 at 00:28 CEST,
> Octavio <octavi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > --- Magnus Bäck <mag...@dsek.lth.se> escribió:
> >
> > > No, not without a content filter or milter that
> provides this
> > > service.
> > >
> > > Also note that Postfix doesn't really have an
> account concept.
> > > There are clients, sender addresses, recipient
> addresses, and
> > > SASL users.
> >
> > do you have any content filter? mailscanner?
>
> MailScanner is not recommended for use with Postfix
> (read the archives).
>
> amavisd-new is a popular choice that I believe
> provides banning of
> filenames depending on the sender or recipient
> address.
>
> Stop top-posting. Now.
>
> --
> Magnus Bäck
> mag...@dsek.lth.se
>
Magnus Bäck
Octavio <octavi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Magnus Bäck <mag...@dsek.lth.se> escribió:
>
> > MailScanner is not recommended for use with Postfix (read the
> > archives).
>
> I was thinking on MailScanner, it has that option, why it is not
> recomended I have been using it with very good results
It interacts with Postfix in unsupported ways, sometimes causing
lost or damaged messages. As I said, read the archives.
Either you stop top-posting, or I stop responding to your posts.
--
Magnus Bäck
mag...@dsek.lth.se
Craig White
> On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 03:06 CEST,
> > > archives).
> >
> > recomended I have been using it with very good results
>
> It interacts with Postfix in unsupported ways, sometimes causing
> lost or damaged messages. As I said, read the archives.
Well I have never noticed lost or damaged messages and I use
Postfix/MailScanner on a number of client servers.
Craig
Magnus Bäck
Craig White <craig...@azapple.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 10:22 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>
> > It interacts with Postfix in unsupported ways, sometimes causing
> > lost or damaged messages. As I said, read the archives.
>
> Well I have never noticed lost or damaged messages and I use
> Postfix/MailScanner on a number of client servers.
The list archives contains examples of a number of cases where messages
have been lost or damaged because of MailScanner. A reliable content
filter should not have such a track record. Over and out.
--
Magnus Bäck
mag...@dsek.lth.se
Wietse Venema
> On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 10:22 +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> > On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 03:06 CEST,
> > Octavio <octavi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > MailScanner is not recommended for use with Postfix (read the
> > > > archives).
> > >
> > > I was thinking on MailScanner, it has that option, why it is not
> > > recomended I have been using it with very good results
> >
> > It interacts with Postfix in unsupported ways, sometimes causing
> > lost or damaged messages. As I said, read the archives.
> ----
> Well I have never noticed lost or damaged messages and I use
> Postfix/MailScanner on a number of client servers.
How would you notice loss of mail? Wait until someone calls
you on the phone?
Wietse