Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[net-next PATCH v4 0/3] net: TCP thin-stream latency-improving modifications

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Andreas Petlund

unread,
Feb 16, 2010, 9:50:01 AM2/16/10
to
This is a series of patches enabling non-intrusive, dynamically triggered modifications that improve retransmission latencies for thin streams.

The patch set was modified according to the feedback received.

Major changes:
-Renamed central variables, sysctls and ioctls.
-Removed redundant allocations.
-Added documentation in ip-sysctl.txt.
-Added tcp thin-stream info in new file: tcp-thin.txt.

Cheers,
Andreas Petlund
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Andreas Petlund

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 7:50:01 AM2/18/10
to
This is a series of patches enabling non-intrusive, dynamically
triggered modifications that improve retransmission latencies
for thin streams.

The patch set was modified according to the feedback received.

Major change:
-Used bitfields to compact the nonagle variable
in the tcp_sock struct. nonagle, thin_lto and
thin_dupack is now contained in the same u8.

I decided to use bitfields to handle this as it is
already done similarly in the tcp_options_received struct.

Also corrected some formatting issues.

David Miller

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 6:50:01 PM2/18/10
to
From: Andreas Petlund <apet...@simula.no>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:42:13 +0100

> This is a series of patches enabling non-intrusive, dynamically
> triggered modifications that improve retransmission latencies
> for thin streams.
>
> The patch set was modified according to the feedback received.
>
> Major change:
> -Used bitfields to compact the nonagle variable
> in the tcp_sock struct. nonagle, thin_lto and
> thin_dupack is now contained in the same u8.
>
> I decided to use bitfields to handle this as it is
> already done similarly in the tcp_options_received struct.
>
> Also corrected some formatting issues.

All applied (I made sure the get the updated version of patch #3),
thanks a lot!

0 new messages