[Bug #14903] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14903
Subject : Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
Submitter : Zhiyong Wu <zwu.k...@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-12-18 4:08 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126110931124738&w=4
Handled-By : Américo Wang <xiyou.w...@gmail.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14786
Subject : Regression in 9f15226e7 (x86, ucode-amd: Ensure ucode update on suspend/resume after CPU off/online cycle)
Submitter : Tomas Carnecky <t...@dbservice.com>
Date : 2009-12-11 00:50 (19 days old)
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896
Subject : REGRESSION for RT2561/RT61 in 2.6.32, related to power saving
Submitter : Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date : 2009-12-06 22:12 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126013756829691&w=4
Handled-By : Gertjan van Wingerde <gwin...@gmail.com>
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14922
Subject : 2.6.32 seemed to have broken nVidia MCP7A sata controller
Submitter : Mike Cui <cui...@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-12-19 6:13 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=126120323407742&w=4
Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <je...@garzik.org>
Robert Hancock <hanco...@gmail.com>
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14298
Subject : warning at manage.c:361 (set_irq_wake), matrix-keypad related?
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-09-30 20:07 (91 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125434130703538&w=4
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14841
Subject : unable to enumerate USB device on port X after suspend/resume
Submitter : Fruhwirth Clemens <cle...@endorphin.org>
Date : 2009-12-19 11:45 (11 days old)
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
Subject : console resume broken since ba15ab0e8d
Submitter : Sascha Hauer <s.h...@pengutronix.de>
Date : 2009-09-30 15:11 (91 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125432349404060&w=4
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14657
Subject : perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7
Submitter : Arjan van de Ven <ar...@infradead.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 19:50 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125866013419738&w=4
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14943
Subject : nfs regression?
Submitter : Nikola Ciprich <extma...@linuxbox.cz>
Date : 2009-12-28 12:10 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126200276223524&w=4
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14892
Subject : intel, KMS, suspend2ram resume, screen black
Submitter : Norbert Preining <prei...@logic.at>
Date : 2009-11-24 4:35 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125903731125558&w=4
Rafael J. Wysocki
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14862
Subject : intel-agp breaks X, regression from 2.6.31
Submitter : Zephaniah E. Hull. <warp-spa...@aehallh.com>
Date : 2009-12-22 22:59 (8 days old)
Robert Hancock
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. �Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry � � � : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14922
> Subject � � � � : 2.6.32 seemed to have broken nVidia MCP7A sata controller
> Submitter � � � : Mike Cui <cui...@gmail.com>
> Date � � � � � �: 2009-12-19 6:13 (11 days old)
> References � � �: http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=126120323407742&w=4
> Handled-By � � �: Jeff Garzik <je...@garzik.org>
> � � � � � � � � �Robert Hancock <hanco...@gmail.com>
Yes, FPDMA auto-activate optimization was introduced for AHCI in
2.6.32 and it appears it doesn't work quite right with either the
reporter's AHCI controller or their drive. I believe they were going
to try the drive with an Intel controller to see if it worked there.
It would be useful if we could get other success/failure reports with
either the particular drive, WDC WD800ADFS-75SLR2 (or at least other
WD Raptor ADFS-series) on other AHCI controllers, or other drives
which have AA support on the MCP7A chipset. One of the two needs
blacklisting for AA support. I'm leaning towards the controller since
other WD drives with AA support work fine on Intel AHCI.
Nikola Ciprich
I can confirm the bug is still present. I've also created kernel
bugzilla account so I can track the status and provide further
testing/feedback.
Thanks for Your interest.
best regards
nik
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:28:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14943
> Subject : nfs regression?
> Submitter : Nikola Ciprich <extma...@linuxbox.cz>
> Date : 2009-12-28 12:10 (2 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126200276223524&w=4
>
>
--
-------------------------------------
Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
tel.: +420 596 603 142
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: ser...@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------
Zephaniah E. Hull
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:28:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14862
> > Subject : intel-agp breaks X, regression from 2.6.31
> > Submitter : Zephaniah E. Hull. <warp-spa...@aehallh.com>
> > Date : 2009-12-22 22:59 (8 days old)
>
> changes will have done something in regards to this.
#14627 and this bug are duplicates.
Bugs #14900, and #14728 look very suspiciously like they might be the
same thing as well.
I would be interested to see if commenting out:
'#define USE_PCI_DMA_API 1' in drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c fixes the
problem for those bugs as well.
I suspect that some better run time checking is called for here.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
(And please keep me on the CC list, I am not subscribed to LKML or KTL.)
Zephaniah E. Hull
> Subject : intel-agp breaks X, regression from 2.6.31
> Submitter : Zephaniah E. Hull. <warp-spa...@aehallh.com>
> Date : 2009-12-22 22:59 (8 days old)
I plan on testing 2.6.32.2 later today in hopes that some of the IOMMU
changes will have done something in regards to this.
Rafael J. Wysocki
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:42:20PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:28:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14862
> > > Subject : intel-agp breaks X, regression from 2.6.31
> > > Submitter : Zephaniah E. Hull. <warp-spa...@aehallh.com>
> > > Date : 2009-12-22 22:59 (8 days old)
> >
> > I plan on testing 2.6.32.2 later today in hopes that some of the IOMMU
> > changes will have done something in regards to this.
>
> #14627 and this bug are duplicates.
>
> Bugs #14900, and #14728 look very suspiciously like they might be the
> same thing as well.
>
> I would be interested to see if commenting out:
> '#define USE_PCI_DMA_API 1' in drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c fixes the
> problem for those bugs as well.
>
> I suspect that some better run time checking is called for here.
Thanks for the update.
David, has there been any progress with bug #14627?
Rafael
Rafael J. Wysocki
> Hello Rafael,
> I can confirm the bug is still present. I've also created kernel
> bugzilla account so I can track the status and provide further
> testing/feedback.
Great, thanks for the update.
Rafael