2.6.34-rc1 on zaurus: does it boot for you?
Pavel Machek
I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
stuck on on previous screen).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Pavel Machek
> > I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
> > seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
> > stuck on on previous screen).
Tried again with -rc2 and -rc3, and neither boots :-(. I did not have
time to set up serial console, yet :-(. Any ideas?
Maciej Rutecki
> Hi!
>
> > > I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
> > > seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
> > > stuck on on previous screen).
>
> Tried again with -rc2 and -rc3, and neither boots :-(. I did not have
> time to set up serial console, yet :-(. Any ideas?
> Pavel
>
I created a Bugzilla entry at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there, thanks!
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
Marek Vasut
> On czwartek, 1 kwietnia 2010 o 08:06:25 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
> > > > seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
> > > > stuck on on previous screen).
> >
> > Tried again with -rc2 and -rc3, and neither boots :-(. I did not have
> > time to set up serial console, yet :-(. Any ideas?
> > Pavel
>
> I created a Bugzilla entry at
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
> for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there,
> thanks!
>
;-)
Pavel Machek
> Dne St 7. dubna 2010 22:26:34 Maciej Rutecki napsal(a):
> > On czwartek, 1 kwietnia 2010 o 08:06:25 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
> > > > > seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
> > > > > stuck on on previous screen).
> > >
> > > Tried again with -rc2 and -rc3, and neither boots :-(. I did not have
> > > time to set up serial console, yet :-(. Any ideas?
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
> > for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there,
> > thanks!
> >
> Pavel, you broke it ... and here you say something about sane arm maintainers
> ;-)
? You know which patch causes it ?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Eric Miao
> On Wed 2010-04-07 22:52:08, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Dne St 7. dubna 2010 22:26:34 Maciej Rutecki napsal(a):
>> > On czwartek, 1 kwietnia 2010 o 08:06:25 Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > > > I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
>> > > > > seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
>> > > > > stuck on on previous screen).
>> > >
>> > > Tried again with -rc2 and -rc3, and neither boots :-(. I did not have
>> > > time to set up serial console, yet :-(. Any ideas?
>> >
>> > I created a Bugzilla entry at
>> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
>> > for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there,
>> > thanks!
>> >
>> Pavel, you broke it ... and here you say something about sane arm maintainers
>> ;-)
>
> ? You know which patch causes it ?
Just have some time to try this out on my corgi, and the kernel runs
happily.
Pavel,
Which exact model are you running your kernel?
Pavel Machek
> >> > > > > I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
> >> > > > > seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
> >> > > > > stuck on on previous screen).
> >> > >
> >> > > Tried again with -rc2 and -rc3, and neither boots :-(. I did not have
> >> > > time to set up serial console, yet :-(. Any ideas?
> >> >
> >> > I created a Bugzilla entry at
> >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
> >> > for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there,
> >> > thanks!
> >> >
> >> Pavel, you broke it ... and here you say something about sane arm maintainers
> >> ;-)
> >
> > ? You know which patch causes it ?
>
> Just have some time to try this out on my corgi, and the kernel runs
> happily.
>
> Pavel,
>
> Which exact model are you running your kernel?
It is Zaurus SL-C3000 (aka spitz). I'm using kexec, but that used to
work. Should I try minimal config?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Eric Miao
>
>> >> > > > > I tried compiling 2.6.34-rc1, and it does not boot :-(. It does not
>> >> > > > > seem to even reset the framebuffer (I'm using kexec -- so it stays
>> >> > > > > stuck on on previous screen).
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Tried again with -rc2 and -rc3, and neither boots :-(. I did not have
>> >> > > time to set up serial console, yet :-(. Any ideas?
>> >> >
>> >> > I created a Bugzilla entry at
>> >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
>> >> > for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there,
>> >> > thanks!
>> >> >
>> >> Pavel, you broke it ... and here you say something about sane arm maintainers
>> >> ;-)
>> >
>> > ? You know which patch causes it ?
>>
>> Just have some time to try this out on my corgi, and the kernel runs
>> happily.
>>
>> Pavel,
>>
>> Which exact model are you running your kernel?
>
> It is Zaurus SL-C3000 (aka spitz). I'm using kexec, but that used to
> work. Should I try minimal config?
I'm using kexec as well, but on corgi. My akita is not on hands these
days, otherwise I can give it a try. I guess there is nothing fundamentally
wrong, so yes, I think it's feasible to try minimal config.