Diffed against 2.6.32
Interrupt vector 0xec has been doubly defined in irq_vectors.h
It seems arbitrary whether LOCAL_PENDING_VECTOR or UV_BAU_MESSAGE is
the higher number. As long as they are unique.
If they are not unique we'll hit a BUG in alloc_system_vector().
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <c...@sgi.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h 2009-11-13 18:37:52.000000000 -0600
+++ linux/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h 2009-11-13 18:38:43.000000000 -0600
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
*/
#define LOCAL_PENDING_VECTOR 0xec
-#define UV_BAU_MESSAGE 0xec
+#define UV_BAU_MESSAGE 0xea
/*
* Self IPI vector for machine checks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
x86: Fix duplicated UV BAU interrupt vector
Interrupt vector 0xec has been doubly defined in irq_vectors.h
It seems arbitrary whether LOCAL_PENDING_VECTOR or
UV_BAU_MESSAGE is the higher number. As long as they are
unique. If they are not unique we'll hit a BUG in
alloc_system_vector().
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <c...@sgi.com>
Cc: <sta...@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <E1NJ9Pe-...@eag09.americas.sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index 6a635bd..4611f08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@