sizeof(dev->dev_addr) is the size of a pointer. On the other hand,
sizeof(pdata->dev_addr) is the size of an array, so use that instead.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression *x;
expression f;
type T;
@@
*f(...,(T)x,...)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <ju...@diku.dk>
---
drivers/net/cpmac.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/cpmac.c b/drivers/net/cpmac.c
index 6782223..8d0be26 100644
--- a/drivers/net/cpmac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/cpmac.c
@@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ static int __devinit cpmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
priv->dev = dev;
priv->ring_size = 64;
priv->msg_enable = netif_msg_init(debug_level, 0xff);
- memcpy(dev->dev_addr, pdata->dev_addr, sizeof(dev->dev_addr));
+ memcpy(dev->dev_addr, pdata->dev_addr, sizeof(pdata->dev_addr));
snprintf(priv->phy_name, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, PHY_ID_FMT, mdio_bus_id, phy_id);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> From: Julia Lawall <ju...@diku.dk>
>
> sizeof(dev->dev_addr) is the size of a pointer. On the other hand,
> sizeof(pdata->dev_addr) is the size of an array, so use that instead.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
...
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <ju...@diku.dk>
Applied.