On Tue 2008-08-12 17:48:27, Milan Broz wrote:
Tested-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@suse.cz>
> >>>> yes. maybe some userspace tool controlling frequency is involved, no idea yet.
> >>> So it definitely is in 126.96.36.199, and it definitely is in 2.6.26?
> > The bug is _not_ in 2.6.26, it was introduced in 188.8.131.52.
> > The problem is, that now the CPU frequency doesn't decrease at some
> > bisect on 2.6.26.y tree finished in this patch:
> > commit 04f496871e8af87a1e40c504371a206fd7389193
> and this seems to fix it for me:
> Do not use unsigned int if there is test for negative number...
> See drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mb...@redhat.com>
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.