The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24362
Subject : perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Submitter : Yinghai Lu <yin...@kernel.org>
Date : 2010-12-01 8:00 (29 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/33c6d6a7ad0ffab9b1b15f8e4107a2af072a05a0
Message-ID : <4CF60095...@kernel.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129119055922065&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25602
Subject : [regression] 2.6.37-rc5: scsi_eh_11 CPU loop
Submitter : Martin Steigerwald <Mar...@lichtvoll.de>
Date : 2010-12-20 10:05 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <201012201105...@lichtvoll.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129283954108331&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22662
Subject : divide error in select_task_rq_fair()
Submitter : Myron Stowe <myron...@hp.com>
Date : 2010-11-10 23:58 (50 days old)
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/13/176
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/13/181
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22642
Subject : 2.6.37-rc1: Disk takes 10 seconds to resume - MacBook2,1
Submitter : Tobias <dev...@plzk.org>
Date : 2010-11-10 19:33 (50 days old)
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25822
Subject : [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/truncate.c:479! on 2.6.37-rc8
Submitter : Gurudas Pai <gurud...@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-12-29 6:58 (1 days old)
Message-ID : <4D1AD935...@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129360511222037&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22542
Subject : [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors
Submitter : Paul Rolland <r...@witbe.net>
Date : 2010-11-02 14:58 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <20101102155...@tux.DEF.witbe.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128870991628970&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
Subject : ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver
Submitter : Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Date : 2010-12-22 02:02 (8 days old)
Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41252
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25422
Subject : nouveau fails to build on ia64
Submitter : Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Date : 2010-12-22 01:49 (8 days old)
Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41242
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24372
Subject : kdump broken on 2.6.37-rc4
Submitter : Stanislaw Gruszka <sgru...@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-12-03 11:16 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <2010120311...@redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129137502323003&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25812
Subject : 2.6.37-rc7: Regression: b43: crashes in hwrng_register()
Submitter : Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario...@tu-ilmenau.de>
Date : 2010-12-28 13:32 (2 days old)
Message-ID : <slrnihjpnh.7t...@darkside.dyn.samba-tng.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129354319002301&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25432
Subject : Alpha fails to build with gcc 4.4
Submitter : Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Date : 2010-12-22 01:55 (8 days old)
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25842
Subject : thinkpad T410s intel i915 regression
Submitter : Travis Hume <tra...@computoring.org>
Date : 2010-12-29 18:21 (1 days old)
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25392
Subject : scsi_eh_11 CPU loop
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin...@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2010-08-18 6:18 (134 days old)
Message-ID : <1282112318.2...@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?t=129283967100004&r=1&w=2
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/20/52
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
Subject : PM/Hibernate: Memory corruption patch introduces regression (2.6.36.2)
Submitter : <akw...@ymail.com>
Date : 2010-12-14 04:00 (16 days old)
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24822
Subject : Embedded DisplayPort is detected wrongly on HP ProBook 5320m
Submitter : Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
Date : 2010-12-13 11:09 (17 days old)
Handled-By : Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23902
Subject : [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mi...@it.uu.se>
Date : 2010-11-27 15:16 (33 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/305e6835e05513406fa12820e40e4a8ecb63743c
Message-ID : <<19697.8378.7...@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129087098911837&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25012
Subject : BUG: i915 causes NULL pointer dereference in 2.6.37-rc5-git4
Submitter : Tõnu Raitviir <jus...@linux.ee>
Date : 2010-12-15 12:48 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/da79de97d254145dcb7c08c978b1093eac15ec9c
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1...@jbbyvx.ohzcpyho.rr>
References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg06282.html
Handled-By : Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41502
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22812
Subject : kernel oops on 2.6.37-rc1
Submitter : Andrew <atsw...@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-11-12 16:05 (48 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a68c439b1966c91f0ef474e2bf275d6792312726
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41192
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24762
Subject : BUG at perf_ctx_adjust_freq (kernel/perf_event.c:1582)
Submitter : Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date : 2010-12-10 12:00 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <c6d829$pqi...@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129198247531612&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
Subject : Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry....@lwfinger.net>
Date : 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
References : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
http://www.mail-archive.com/inte...@lists.freedesktop.org/msg02235.html
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24772
Subject : Crash with btrfs rootfs on dm-crypt [ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806! ] on linux 2.6.37-rc5
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio....@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-12-10 20:30 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTi=j9zsaYNcu=NgGV=HfE-3rNHzVs...@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129201308706568&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24582
Subject : Kernel Oops at tty_buffer_request_room when using pppd program (2.6.37-rc4)
Submitter : baoyb <ba...@avit.org.cn>
Date : 2010-12-08 13:55 (22 days old)
Message-ID : <EF6DDE218DB34702B1FA84D6CD7EA771@baoyb>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129181763525738&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25402
Subject : kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!
Submitter : carlos <carlos...@ono.com>
Date : 2010-12-21 19:58 (9 days old)
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23102
Subject : [bisected] i915 regression in post 2.6.36 kernels
Submitter : Johannes Hirte <johanne...@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
Date : 2010-11-10 7:02 (50 days old)
Message-ID : <201011100802.203...@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128937310017057&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22472
Subject : vga_switcheroo fails to switch from intel to ati
Submitter : Radu Andries <admi...@tuxfamily.org>
Date : 2010-11-08 16:46 (52 days old)
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24592
Subject : 2.6.37-rc5: NULL pointer oops in selinux_socket_unix_stream_connect
Submitter : Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jer...@goop.org>
Date : 2010-12-08 21:09 (22 days old)
Message-ID : <4CFFF3F...@goop.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129184256629712&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22912
Subject : spi_lm70llp module crash on unload (2.6.37-rc1)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy....@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-11-05 0:16 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <20101104171620.00d...@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128891627913647&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22562
Subject : Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 - logs spammed with "unable to enumerate USB port" - bisected to commit 3df7169e
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry....@lwfinger.net>
Date : 2010-11-02 22:32 (58 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/3df7169e73fc1d71a39cffeacc969f6840cdf52b
Message-ID : <4CD09166...@lwfinger.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128873713207906&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24272
Subject : iotop reports insane per-process disk read/write statistics
Submitter : Brian Rogers <br...@xyzw.org>
Date : 2010-12-03 12:00 (27 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/85893120699f8bae8caa12a8ee18ab5fceac978e
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942
Subject : [2.6.37-rc1, OOM] virtblk: OOM in do_virtblk_request()
Submitter : Dave Chinner <da...@fromorbit.com>
Date : 2010-11-05 1:30 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <20101105013003.GE13830@dastard>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128892062917641&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22882
Subject : (2.6.37-rc1) amd64-agp module crashed on second load
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy....@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-11-05 0:13 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <20101104171333.fea...@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128891605213447&w=2
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23472
Subject : 2.6.37-rc2 vs. 2.6.36 laptop backlight changes?
Submitter : Patrick Schaaf <net...@bof.de>
Date : 2010-11-17 13:41 (43 days old)
Message-ID : <1290001262.5727.2.camel@lat1>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129000127920912&w=2
It is still in 2.6.37-rc8. I got some debugging tips from Alan Stern, but have
not had time to follow-up. I hope/need to make some progress before 2.6.37 is
released.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
Neither 2.6.37-rc8 nor the patches listed above fix my system.
Larry
Regards,
Fabio
OK, so I'm closing the bug as unreproducible.
Thanks,
Rafael
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
Does reverting commit 448f53a "drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC
clocks" help?
Rafael
Fixed in 2.6.37-rc7.
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
> Subject : ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver
This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
incoming mail queue :-(
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.
Thanks,
Rafael
Do you know which commit fixed it?
Rafael
...
Kernel panic - not syncing: map_single ...
Pid 935, comm: NetworkManager Tainted
call trace
panic+oxbf/0x200
? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
?swiotlb_tlb_map_single+0x1ce/0x250
?map_single+0x46/0x60
swiotlb_map_page+0xa6/0xf
... and then the FREEZE ... only a hard reset brings to live (with
2.6.36-2) Linux.
carlos.
Thanks for the info.
Why did you put "regression" into double quotes?
Rafael
carlos
On 12/30/2010 11:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, carlos palma wrote:
>> I can confirm that this "regression" still exists with the kernel
>> 2.6.37-rc8.
>> The Call Trace is basically the same:
>>
>> ...
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: map_single ...
>> Pid 935, comm: NetworkManager Tainted
>> call trace
>> panic+oxbf/0x200
>> ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
>> ?swiotlb_tlb_map_single+0x1ce/0x250
>> ?map_single+0x46/0x60
>> swiotlb_map_page+0xa6/0xf
>> ... and then the FREEZE ... only a hard reset brings to live (with he begining
I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
as well as :
Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
Regards,
Paul
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:06:58 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> report of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22542
> Subject : [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors
> Submitter : Paul Rolland <r...@witbe.net>
> Date : 2010-11-02 14:58 (58 days old)
> Message-ID : <20101102155...@tux.DEF.witbe.net>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128870991628970&w=2
>
>
>
--
Paul Rolland E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense RIPE : PR12-RIPE
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrolland
Skype : rollandpaul
"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's
too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10
or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you
when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?'"
--Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation
>> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
>> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
>> incoming mail queue :-(
>
> Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.
s/is/isn't/ I assume.
I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any
regression here, AFAIK at least.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
There were some last-minute fixes related to i915 added to the Linus' tree
after 2.6.37-rc8. Perhaps you can give them a try?
Rafael
> On Friday, December 31, 2010, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
> > Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> >
> > as well as :
> >
> > Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
> > Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
>
> There were some last-minute fixes related to i915 added to the
> Linus' tree after 2.6.37-rc8. Perhaps you can give them a try?
if this is in any way related to various systems booting to a black
screen (as i described earlier), i built an absolutely up-to-date
kernel from the latest tree and that didn't solve the problem. i'm
open to testing suggestions.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:52:48 -0500 (EST)
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> if this is in any way related to various systems booting to a black
> screen (as i described earlier), i built an absolutely up-to-date
> kernel from the latest tree and that didn't solve the problem. i'm
> open to testing suggestions.
Nope... machine is booting fine, screen is Ok, and in fact the machine
seems to be working perfectly... The only point is that I never saw these
in any kernel prior to 2.6.37-rc1, and them being labelled as "ERROR" made
me write a report.
Anyway, if some can tell me how to get this linus'tree, I'm ready to give
it a try Sunday afternoon.
Best,
Paul
--
Paul Rolland E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense RIPE : PR12-RIPE
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrolland
Skype : rollandpaul
"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's
too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10
or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you
when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?'"
--Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation
> There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx.
Right. It seems I was reading what wasn't written.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:47:24 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Friday, December 31, 2010, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
> > Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR*
> > Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> >
> > as well as :
> >
> > Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR*
> > fixme: max PWM is zero. Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel:
> > [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
>
> There were some last-minute fixes related to i915 added to the Linus' tree
> after 2.6.37-rc8. Perhaps you can give them a try?
OK, currently running :
[root@tux ~]# uname -a
Linux tux.DEF.witbe.net 2.6.37-rc8-00014-g3643e0e #1 SMP Sun Jan 2 16:25:04 CET 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
and I've seen that too :
Jan 3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
Jan 3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
Jan 3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
Jan 3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
So, two possibilities :
- 2.6.37-rc8-00014-g3643e0e is not what you wanted me to test,
- the problem's still there.
Best,
Paul
--
Paul Rolland E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense RIPE : PR12-RIPE
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrolland
Skype : rollandpaul
"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's
too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10
or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you
when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?'"
--Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation
I think it's still there. Thanks for testing!
Rafael
On 12/30/2010 11:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: