Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Macbook bug after suspend to disk

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Lionel Landwerlin

unread,
Aug 20, 2007, 7:10:11 PM8/20/07
to
I'm using 2.6.22.1 on my macbook (32bits). I had got this trace a few
hours after a suspend to disk. I never got this kind of trace without
suspend. I will try to reproduce with 2.6.22.3.

Here is the trace :

Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980!
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: SMP
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: Modules linked in: wlan_tkip wlan_ccmp usbkbd ath_pci button nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc ac battery cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_powersave i915 drm binfmt_misc hci_usb rfcomm l2cap bluetooth ppdev lp parport ipv6 dm_snapshot dm_mirror dm_mod cpufreq_userspace acpi_cpufreq freq_table firewire_sbp2 loop joydev usbmouse appletouch snd_hda_intel tsdev sky2 rtc_cmos rtc_core intelfb i2c_i801 wlan_scan_sta iTCO_wdt snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore rtc_lib i2c_algo_bit ath_rate_sample intel_agp agpgart i2c_core snd_page_alloc wlan ath_hal(P) evdev ext3 jbd mbcache usbhid hid sd_mod ide_cd cdrom ata_piix ata_generic libata scsi_mod piix firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd generic ide_core uhci_hcd usbcore thermal processor fan
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: CPU: 0
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c016706a>] Tainted: P VLI
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: EFLAGS: 00210092 (2.6.22-1-686 #1)
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: EIP is at cache_alloc_refill+0xe9/0x451
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: eax: 0000007f ebx: c20bf800 ecx: df9e8d40 edx: 00000000
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: esi: db91c000 edi: 00000010 ebp: dfff1600 esp: eecdddbc
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: Process hald (pid: 5167, ti=eecdc000 task=ef3a8a50 task.ti=eecdc000)
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: Stack: 00000000 00000000 000000d0 df9e8d40 df9e0c00 00000000 c0152f3b 00000044
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: 000000d0 c0327ff4 ef3a8a50 00000000 000000a4 df9e8d40 00200202 c210ac24
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: c0167553 000000a4 00000001 000000a4 c02017f4 00000004 c210ac00 00000000
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: Call Trace:
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c0152f3b>] __alloc_pages+0x52/0x294
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c0167553>] kmem_cache_zalloc+0x42/0x79
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c02017f4>] acpi_ps_alloc_op+0x5d/0x9e
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c02014a7>] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x6f6/0x737
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c02007b2>] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x60/0x237
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c01f444c>] acpi_ds_init_aml_walk+0xb4/0xfe
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c02019f0>] acpi_ps_execute_method+0x11b/0x1bb
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c01fed59>] acpi_ns_evaluate+0x99/0xf0
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c01fe9c1>] acpi_evaluate_object+0x139/0x1dc
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c01f0a6d>] acpi_evaluate_integer+0x80/0xb3
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<f8e01096>] acpi_ac_get_state+0x26/0x61 [ac]
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c015d3ed>] vma_link+0x54/0xc9
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<f8e01130>] acpi_ac_seq_show+0x12/0x4e [ac]
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c017fc87>] seq_read+0xe7/0x274
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c017fba0>] seq_read+0x0/0x274
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c016a5b9>] vfs_read+0xa6/0x128
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c016a9b5>] sys_read+0x41/0x67
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: [<c0103d0e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x6b/0xa1
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: =======================
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: Code: 00 00 00 8b 75 00 39 ee 75 15 8b 75 10 8d 45 10 c7 45 34 01 00 00 00 39 c6 0f 84 9c 00 00 00 8b 4c 24 0c 8b 41 38 39 46 10 72 34 <0f> 0b eb fe 8b 44 24 10 8b 5e 14 8b 08 8b 44 24 0c 8b 50 2c 8b
Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: EIP: [<c016706a>] cache_alloc_refill+0xe9/0x451 SS:ESP 0068:eecdddbc


--
Lionel Landwerlin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Andrew Morton

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 11:40:11 AM9/5/07
to
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:59:50 +0200 Lionel Landwerlin <lan...@free.fr> wrote:

Three weeks, no responses.

> I'm using 2.6.22.1 on my macbook (32bits). I had got this trace a few
> hours after a suspend to disk. I never got this kind of trace without
> suspend. I will try to reproduce with 2.6.22.3.

And was it reproducible?

> Here is the trace :
>
> Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980!

That's here:


/*
* The slab was either on partial or free list so
* there must be at least one object available for
* allocation.
*/
BUG_ON(slabp->inuse < 0 || slabp->inuse >= cachep->num);


> Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: SMP
> Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: Modules linked in: wlan_tkip wlan_ccmp usbkbd ath_pci button nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc ac battery cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_powersave i915 drm binfmt_misc hci_usb rfcomm l2cap bluetooth ppdev lp parport ipv6 dm_snapshot dm_mirror dm_mod cpufreq_userspace acpi_cpufreq freq_table firewire_sbp2 loop joydev usbmouse appletouch snd_hda_intel tsdev sky2 rtc_cmos rtc_core intelfb i2c_i801 wlan_scan_sta iTCO_wdt snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore rtc_lib i2c_algo_bit ath_rate_sample intel_agp agpgart i2c_core snd_page_alloc wlan ath_hal(P) evdev ext3 jbd mbcache usbhid hid sd_mod ide_cd cdrom ata_piix ata_generic libata scsi_mod piix firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd generic ide_core uhci_hcd usbcore thermal processor fan
> Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: CPU: 0
> Aug 20 14:14:23 cocoduo kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c016706a>] Tainted: P VLI

People might want to see this reproduced on an untainted kernel. Did you
try disabling ath_hal?

Well it seems to think that some ACPI slab cache is wrecked.

It would be interesting to see if the same happens with CONFIG_SLUB=n,
CONFIG_SLAB=y.

Is this a regression? Was 2.6.21 OK? 2.6.20?

If you didn't have all slab debug options enabled, please do so.

If this is repeatable and if nobody fixes it (likely) then please raise a
reports against acpi at bugzilla.kernel.org, thanks.

0 new messages