There's nothing in dmesg indicating a problem:
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30 (adi@pyron) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-10) ) #75 SMP Thu Jan 27 00:39:11 PST 2011
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 8.420170] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, large block/inode numbers, no debug enabled
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 8.434527] XFS mounting filesystem dm-8
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 8.676644] Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: dm-8 (logdev: internal)
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 8.734279] Ending XFS recovery on filesystem: dm-8 (logdev: internal)
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 8.762724] XFS mounting filesystem dm-9
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 8.957986] Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: dm-9
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 8.985909] XFS mounting filesystem dm-10
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 9.098404] Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: dm-10 (logdev: internal)
Jan 27 08:04:37 pyron kernel: [ 9.205018] Ending XFS recovery on filesystem: dm-10 (logdev: internal)
/d1 is a 200GB XFS on DM on AHCI SATA on a Core i7 desktop board.
The erroneous statvfs reports are visible in this munin graph:
http://web.hexapodia.org/~adi/tmp/20110201-df-pyron.png
(the filesystem is actually 72% full currently, and should be linearly
filling as is visible around Jan 26.)
% sudo xfs_info /d1
meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg0-d1 isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=13107200 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=52428800, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=25600, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
I'm back on 2.6.37 right now, I'll try a new git tip tonight.
-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
It'll be the excessive specualtive preallocation bug introduced in
.38-rc1 which is fixed in .38-rc3.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
da...@fromorbit.com
Indeed, I've been running 2.6.38-rc3-00019-gafe8a88 for 18 hours now
with the same load and not seen any issues.
Thanks,
-andy