Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Raid system fails to boot after moving from 2.6 kernel to 3.5

Received: by 10.180.94.98 with SMTP id db2mr1690350wib.2.1351480613379;
        Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: ha8ni72329wib.1!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!newsfeed.x-privat.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org>
Newsgroups: linux.gentoo.user
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Raid system fails to boot after moving from 2.6 kernel to 3.5
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:20:02 +0200
Message-ID: <jYOf8-7mj-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <jYNCq-6rL-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: gentoo-u...@lists.gentoo.org
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
List-ID: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
Reply-To: gentoo-u...@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Ziggo-Spambar: ----
X-Ziggo-Spamscore: -4.1
X-Ziggo-Spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HEAD=0.817,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982
X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Flag: No
Approved: robo...@news.nic.it
Lines: 77
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robo...@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:10:15 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID: <2989063f-e3e9-436e-9987-584d14305b04@email.android.com>
X-Original-References: <CAOq67MBt2tgAWYTX2qwYcaLpq18erJafmraXOBu397+QTV+...@mail.gmail.com>
Bytes: 4328
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----F2P0VIMEIN2A1D3V1QSP3E4U0JT5J6"

------F2P0VIMEIN2A1D3V1QSP3E4U0JT5J6
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Pau Peris <sibok1...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>
>i'm running GNU/Gentoo Linux with a custom compiled kernel and i've
>just
>migrated from a 2.6 kernel to a 3.5.
>
>
>As my HD's are on raid 0 mode i use a custom initrd file in order to be
>able to boot. While kernel 2.6 is able to boot without problems the new
>3.5
>compiled kernel fails to boot complaining about "no block devices
>found".
>After taking a look at initrd.cpio contained scripts i can see the
>failure
>message is given by mdadm tool.
>
>
>Does anyone has a clue about that? Thansk in advanced. :)

Paul,

I had a similar issue with a new system. There it was caused by mdadm try=
ing to start the raid devices before all the drives were identified.
Try disabling "Asynchronous SCSI scanning" in the kernel config. (CONFIG_=
SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC)
Or add "scsi_mod.scan=3Dsync" to the kernel commandline to see if it's th=
e same cause.

--
Joost
--=20
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------F2P0VIMEIN2A1D3V1QSP3E4U0JT5J6
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head/><body><html><head></head><body><div class=3D"gmail_quote">Pa=
u Peris &lt;sibok1...@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 20=
4, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

<p style=3D"margin:0px">Hi,</p><p style=3D"margin:0px"><br /></p><p style=
=3D"margin:0px">i&#39;m running GNU/Gentoo Linux with a custom compiled k=
ernel and i&#39;ve just migrated from a 2.6 kernel to a 3.5.</p><p style=3D=
"margin:0px">
<br /></p><p style=3D"margin:0px">As my HD&#39;s are on raid 0 mode i use=
 a custom initrd file in order to be able to boot. While kernel 2.6 is ab=
le to boot without problems the new 3.5 compiled kernel fails to boot com=
plaining about &quot;no block devices found&quot;. After taking a look at=
 initrd.cpio contained scripts i can see the failure message is given by =
mdadm tool.</p>
<p style=3D"margin:0px"><br /></p><p style=3D"margin:0px">Does anyone has=
 a clue about that? Thansk in advanced. :)</p><div><br /></div>
</blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all">Paul,<br>
<br>
I had a similar issue with a new system. There it was caused by mdadm try=
ing to start the raid devices before all the drives were identified.<br>
Try disabling &quot;Asynchronous SCSI scanning&quot; in the kernel config=
. (CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC)<br>
Or add &quot;scsi_mod.scan=3Dsync&quot; to the kernel commandline to see =
if it&#39;s the same cause.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Joost<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body=
></html></body></html>
------F2P0VIMEIN2A1D3V1QSP3E4U0JT5J6--