Message from discussion
Not a bible thumper. . .
From: "David L. Dight" <techn...@researchtech.com.au>
Subject: Re: Not a bible thumper. . .
Date: 1996/07/17
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960717102033.006850ec@researchtech.com.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169488259
sender: owner-linux-ker...@vger.rutgers.edu
x-sender: techn...@researchtech.com.au
content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
x-hdr-sender: techn...@researchtech.com.au
mime-version: 1.0
x-env-sender: owner-linux-kernel-outgo...@vger.rutgers.edu
newsgroups: linux.dev.kernel
At 18:39 15/07/96 -0400, you wrote:
>
>I just did a few 'find's because I was curious.. I'm not suggesting that we
>change these, just something to chew on. The only one that reaches the user is
>the UFS driver.
>
>./fs/isofs/inode.c:/* Some dipshit decided to store some other bit of
informatio
>n in the high
>./drivers/cdrom/mcd.c: that are supposedly "OUT OF TOLERANCE" (but are
really sh
>itty presses!)
>./arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c: * else we eat shit later big time.
>./arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c: * this shit off... nice job Fujitsu.
>./fs/ufs/ufs_super.c: printk("ufs_read_super: fucking Sun blows me\n");
>./lib/vsprintf.c: * Wirzenius wrote this portably, Torvalds fucked it up :-)
>./drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.c: CURRENT=req->next; /* task can fuck it up GTL
>*/
>./arch/sparc/kernel/process.c: /* fuck me plenty */
>./arch/sparc/kernel/sunos_ioctl.c: /* Binary compatibility is good American
know
>how fuckin' up. */
>
OK. So what? Tell us what we're meant to chew. So you've learnt to use find
have you?
---
techn...@researchtech.com.au
"The difference between experts and professionals is that the former rarely
get paid, never make any mistakes they'll admit to, and constantly rate
themselves as professionals; whilst the latter always get paid, often make
mistakes they're forced to admit to and are constantly confused with experts."