Received: by 10.180.82.193 with SMTP id k1mr1674054wiy.0.1350408002930;
        Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q10ni65146022wif.0!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!gin-ad1-unet1.teleglobe.net!news.asdasd.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.user
Subject: Re: Number of Debian packages available.
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:20:02 +0200
Message-ID: <jViYa-7n-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <jVcJ4-JT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <jVd2q-12h-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <jVdc6-1rx-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <jVeUy-3lG-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <jVh61-6fD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <jVhpo-6zd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <jVhIK-6Ty-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <jViv8-7S2-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: debian-u...@lists.debian.org
Old-Return-Path: <andreimpope...@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.689 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PGPSIGNATURE=-5,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01] autolearn=ham
Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=U+KqqiOneRPqWPpiAClwhXfNtmMYYIyvvDok+BEw6aA=;
        b=Q96yverP8oAP/pT6DsUVv6hcjHwW4ONBKVUgzf1f1SMmpuJ29n48Qe9xzUlLPJml89
         74b/r3Q8znUWMOMmxmB6RY+z26v7NUYCBprk7kV/+MRp/MfSGVLp0K75G8yHixSk2YJR
         3EZYYNM76lBH43Kqv5GkejNavx4TyTGLcedbeRG0aWNMLOhKFP2RE5myqLvdIv/bb3s3
         c2CPOZVs6I3XQEHzRUeNia88PXxAf26g/8y056mON+IPkB5FYu8C172WHr3i0ONhrEya
         xJJdyPGOjZU6Io6J+Fe/xqOQ+k66K3iti4dCfSqWEOnABYvO88tVNpHprlzTdmGZuB8u
         l3lg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VvnGyWaJ9JuxX38U"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/641513
List-ID: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
Approved: robo...@news.nic.it
Lines: 57
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robo...@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:10:21 +0300
X-Original-Message-ID: <20121016171021.GX5...@sid.nuvreauspam>
X-Original-References: <201210161130.41942.lisi.re...@gmail.com>
 <20121016105555.GG4530@desktop>
 <201210161206.17192.lisi.re...@gmail.com>
 <20121016125921.GH4530@desktop>
 <20121016161523.0f3f1...@jretrading.com>
 <1350401659.1236.66.ca...@localhost.localdomain>
 <20121016155611.GS5...@sid.nuvreauspam>
 <1350405860.1236.115.ca...@localhost.localdomain>


--VvnGyWaJ9JuxX38U
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Ma, 16 oct 12, 18:44:20, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > =20
> > Why should every application *capable* of outputting to jackd force one=
=20
> > to install jackd?
>=20
> Jackd could be a "suggested dependency", if you don't use jackd, why
> should the app link against the lib? The app should link against it, as
> soon as you configure the app to use jackd and than you need jackd
> completely, not only the lib.

As far as I know (not my area of expertise, but I have been struggling=20
to compile XBMC for my Raspberry Pi recently), such capabilities are=20
compile time options.

When you compile an application with output capability to jackd and/or=20
pulseaudio the corresponding library becomes a hard dependency (i.e. the=20
application may even crash if the library is not installed).

Or would you expect regular users to recompile applications just to=20
choose between plain alsa, pulseaudio or jackd output?

Kind regards,
Andrei
--=20
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic

--VvnGyWaJ9JuxX38U
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQfZT9AAoJEHNWs3jeoi3pln8IAKhFVlXSwL0wnIJz0dGfl4/f
5jL/XiC1zq0cHNyYuJfTTADefihzeNOyhkraDxqniQ4AwQyK9/yWYCBNsxUX1Zw1
vm2an4uXbe7OIx7LQ8HzknX9mF9UDBCL+qycgZvT0Og7B297l20uJ1XNUAtdfDSs
ttlBljucAOv5qklphIdmRnbY/n5Wg85jZjXWNEz1sU8FYv/YBWCXjYiZ7BBmzpcC
HMmnJE5qfi+PzQbHjaCSSFNRxlY6y5EuFJVya7YY74LDzSRJsx5fjASDgLcrHVbl
csjIYxTBP7K4gz5zGOP3JuEwKg72imTc57e8KoX33ZQaSeFppbuz9CwWIOwt56w=
=Rf4C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VvnGyWaJ9JuxX38U--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQU...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121016171021.GX5...@sid.nuvreauspam