Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Is it worth back porting PEP 3147 to Python < 3.2?

Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.158.31.10.MISMATCH!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Barry Warsaw <ba...@canonical.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: Is it worth back porting PEP 3147 to Python < 3.2?
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:00:02 +0200
Message-ID: <eC8QW-59N-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <eC8xz-4HF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <eC8QW-59N-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com>
Old-Return-Path: <ba...@canonical.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.98 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5]
	autolearn=ham
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256;
 boundary="Sig_/f6/eN7RKT_KdSl_JEdtB9yq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/6691
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
Approved: robo...@news.nic.it
Lines: 48
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robo...@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, "ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com"
 <ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:55:25 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <20100422135525.123127fc@heresy>
X-Original-References: <20100422133904.2905d224@heresy>
	<ef3ef896-c07a-44d0-947f-5f7f488f3...@email.android.com>

--Sig_/f6/eN7RKT_KdSl_JEdtB9yq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 22, 2010, at 01:47 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:

>Based on my experience with the Python 2.5 and 2.6 transitions, I'd really
>prefer to have Ubuntu follow Debian rather than lead.

Ideally, yes I'd like the same thing, but I'll need help because I'm so new=
 to
Debian.

So if it makes sense for Ubuntu and doesn't harm Debian, then it would be
acceptable to patch Python in Debian even if it doesn't help much (because
Debian won't have multiple versions of Python 2.x)?

-Barry

--Sig_/f6/eN7RKT_KdSl_JEdtB9yq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=7aI6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/f6/eN7RKT_KdSl_JEdtB9yq--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-REQU...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100422135525.123127fc@heresy