-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6-686 depends on:
ii linux-image-2.6.24-1-686 2.6.24-6 Linux 2.6.24 image on PPro/Celeron
linux-image-2.6-686 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
Hi,
After upgrading to Kernel v 2.6.24 hwclock does not work anymore because it times out while waiting for /dev/rtc to give a tick.
/dev/rtc exists.
It only works with the option --directisa.
However it did not show this behaviour on (debian package ) kernel v 2.6.22 and earlier.
My PC is a ACER Aspire 1694WLMI Laptop.
Jackflash:/# hwclock --show
select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
Jackflash:/# hwclock --show --debug
hwclock from util-linux-ng 2.13.1
Using /dev interface to clock.
Last drift adjustment done at 1209577940 seconds after 1969
Last calibration done at 1209577940 seconds after 1969
Hardware clock is on local time
Assuming hardware clock is kept in local time.
Waiting for clock tick...
select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
....got clock tick
Jackflash:/# ls -l /dev/ | grep rtc
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 10, 135 2008-04-30 21:52 rtc
Jackflash:/# hwclock --show --directisa --debug
hwclock from util-linux-ng 2.13.1
Using direct I/O instructions to ISA clock.
Last drift adjustment done at 1209577940 seconds after 1969
Last calibration done at 1209577940 seconds after 1969
Hardware clock is on local time
Assuming hardware clock is kept in local time.
Waiting for clock tick...
....got clock tick
Time read from Hardware Clock: 2008/04/30 19:57:56
Hw clock time : 2008/04/30 19:57:56 = 1209578276 seconds since 1969
Wed 30 Apr 2008 07:57:56 PM CEST -0.463600 seconds
Greetings,
Jos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.24+13
> Severity: normal
>
please check against 2.6.25 in unstable,
installs just fine in testing.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
478749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems