Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug#701706: RFS: ocamlrss/2.0-1 [ITP] -- RSS 2.0 parser and printer for OCaml

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Paul Wise

unread,
Mar 5, 2013, 6:40:01 AM3/5/13
to
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Prach Pongpanich wrote:

> I already done.

Great, perhaps they can sponsor this.

> I see in debian-ocaml-maint [1] but I can't find a bug against lintian. [2]

Please file one.

> lintian overrides, upstream changelog is not available (#513544).

It is not correct to override these, instead you should ask upstream
to add a NEWS file or ChangeLog.

--
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6GSvrGr+qjwsCEt0188...@mail.gmail.com

Stéphane Glondu

unread,
May 23, 2013, 7:40:01 AM5/23/13
to
Le 23/05/2013 05:45, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
> Packaging a new upstream 2.2.0:

Sorry for taking so long, but I wanted to look at the whole thread
first... which I haven't done so far. Anyway, since you've been waiting
for some time now, I've just directly looked at your package without
looking at previous comments.

> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocamlrss/ocamlrss_2.2.0-1.dsc
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocamlrss.git

Please do not override Lintian tags about hardening.

Native plugins should be installed only when natdynlink is available,
please consider s/OPT/DYN/ in librss-ocaml.install.in.

Please add ${shlibs:Depends} to -dev package as well.

The relationship with Cameleon described in the description suggests a
versioned Breaks/Replaces relationship instead of a Conflicts.

A period is missing at the end of the -dev description.

rss_date.* files have been removed in version 2.1.0. Please update
debian/copyright accordingly.

You say "LGPL-3+" in debian/copyright whereas it is written "LGPL-3" (no
"or later" clause) everywhere else. Please fix.


Cheers,

--
Stéphane


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/519DFFB3...@debian.org

Prach Pongpanich

unread,
May 25, 2013, 12:30:02 AM5/25/13
to
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Stéphane Glondu <glo...@debian.org> wrote:
> Le 24/05/2013 10:09, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
>> Thanks for your review and suggestion, I have done all of the above.
>
> Your Replaces/Breaks clause is always satisfied, even in oldstable...
> isnt't? If so, it is pointless and you should remove it.
>
> Does ocamlrss actually install files in the same location as cameleon?
> Replaces/Breaks/Conflicts are there for expressing package-level
> relationships, not for end users (in)convenience. IMHO, just installing
> a module with the same name in different locations is not enough to
> justify it.

No, I remove Replaces/Breaks from the librss-ocaml-dev package.

> I don't know exactly what you understood when I said:
>> A period is missing at the end of the -dev description.
>
> ... but from your changes, it looks like it is not the lack of a
> punctuation sign.

My bad, I added a full stop (period) to the end of description.

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocamlrss.git

Cheers,

Prach


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFn8M+UDRNPCdvZDckR_Kp3E...@mail.gmail.com

Debian Bug Tracking System

unread,
May 25, 2013, 6:00:02 AM5/25/13
to
Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2013 10:26:56 +0200
with message-id <51A075D...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#701706: RFS: ocamlrss/2.0-1 [ITP] -- RSS 2.0 parser and printer for OCaml
has caused the Debian Bug report #701706,
regarding RFS: ocamlrss/2.2.0-1 [ITP] -- RSS 2.0 parser and
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
701706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701706
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
0 new messages