Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug#285337: Large file support disabled in this build

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ian Chiew

unread,
Apr 14, 2005, 5:10:13 AM4/14/05
to
Package: libapr0
Version: 2.0.53-5
Followup-For: Bug #285337


Dear package maintainers:

The following line in debian/rules is commented out:

#AP2_CONFLAGS += -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

Please turn large file support (back) on!

Without it, the apr_off_t type used internally by Apache will be only
32-bits wide, thus causing the reported problem.

I realize that this will break the module ABI (and force a rebuild of
all already-packaged Apache2 modules). But releasing Sarge with
its flagwhip webserver sans large file support seems a bit silly.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libapr0 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libpcre3 4.5-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi

-- no debconf information


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

Adam Conrad

unread,
Apr 14, 2005, 5:40:15 AM4/14/05
to
Ian Chiew said:
>
> The following line in debian/rules is commented out:
>
> #AP2_CONFLAGS += -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

We know.

> Without it, the apr_off_t type used internally by Apache will be only
> 32-bits wide, thus causing the reported problem.

We know.

> I realize that this will break the module ABI (and force a rebuild of
> all already-packaged Apache2 modules). But releasing Sarge with its
> flagwhip webserver sans large file support seems a bit silly.

This just isn't going to happen. We already did this dance once (turning
on LFS, then turning it back off when a few interesting bugs cropped up as
a result). We'll have LFS in Apache 2.1 and libapr1, not before.

... Adam

0 new messages