Upstream just notified us that (some or all, not checked) files in
/usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/source/public/wsuipa/ are missing a
license statement. Karl Berry said that he once knew the author in
person, but I'm sure he won't try to contact him before the release of
TeXLive 2008.
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages texlive-fonts-extra depends on:
ii texlive-base 2007.dfsg.1-2 TeX Live: Essential programs and f
ii texlive-common 2007.dfsg.1-2 TeX Live: Base component
Versions of packages texlive-fonts-extra recommends:
pn texlive-fonts-extra-doc <none> (no description available)
ii texpower 0.2-7 Macros for creating professional p
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf 1.5.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii ucf 3.007 Update Configuration File: preserv
Versions of packages texlive-fonts-extra is related to:
pn tetex-base <none> (no description available)
ii tetex-bin 2007.dfsg.1-2 TeX Live: teTeX transitional packa
ii tetex-extra 2007.dfsg.1-2 TeX Live: teTeX transitional packa
ii tex-common 1.11 common infrastructure for building
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
> On Fr, 18 Jul 2008, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Upstream just notified us that (some or all, not checked) files in
>> /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/source/public/wsuipa/ are missing a
>> license statement. Karl Berry said that he once knew the author in
>> person, but I'm sure he won't try to contact him before the release of
>> TeXLive 2008.
>
> Right, but since these fonts use the cm metafont program I assume they
> cannot be under a commercial copyright??? Karl?
They can, since cm is in the public domain, not LPPL or GPL or similar.
Regards, Frank