Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

[Russ Allbery]

gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> writes:

> Package: src:krb5
> Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

> 1.10.1+dfsg-6 FTBFS on all architectures:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=krb5&ver=1.10.1%2Bdfsg-6

See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for the
discussion.

--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

[Raphael Hertzog]

On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for the
> discussion.

Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want to revert
this change...

So maybe this should be fixed in krb5 anyway.

/me wishes that uploads were blocked if reverse build dependencies
fails to build.

Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/

[Sam Hartman]

>>>>> "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <her...@debian.org> writes:

Raphael> On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for
>> the discussion.

Raphael> Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want
Raphael> to revert this change...

Raphael> So maybe this should be fixed in krb5 anyway.

Was planning on it eventually; just had hoped to get the small change
in.

As it turns out krb5 upstream has abandoned texinfo as their doc system.
Ben kaduk has done most of the work of moving to the new upstream
version so i'll do that.
It means not fixing the kpasswd security issue for testing for longer as
I suspect I'll hold that in unstable for a while.

Raphael> /me wishes that uploads were blocked if reverse build
Raphael> dependencies fails to build.

or at least there was a way to file a serious bug and tell the buildds
to use a version in testing say for a month or two while the issue was
resolved one way or another.

Raphael> Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian
Raphael> Developer

Raphael> Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: →
Raphael> http://debian-handbook.info/get/

[Sam Hartman]

Actually, it's probably easier if I make the updates.
rationale:
You have your repo mixed in with something else.
It makes a bit harder to construct the initial dpm state.
but I can take what you have and the 1.11.2 tarball and prepsource
myself and then rsync the repo into place on alioth.

It probably will not be today though.

[Sam Hartman]

As I recall 1.11 includes a verto update.
how critical is that?
do I need to update debian libverto befor krb5?