Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#650096: perl: test failure on hurd: ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Dominic Hargreaves
Nov 26, 2011, 9:00:02 AM11/26/11
to
Source: perl
Version: 5.14.2-5
Severity: important
../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Tests out of sequence. Found (10) but expected (9)
Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 9.
Files=1, Tests=9, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr + 0.03 sys = 0.08 CPU)
Result: FAIL
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Version: 5.14.2-5
Severity: important
../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Tests out of sequence. Found (10) but expected (9)
Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 9.
Files=1, Tests=9, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr + 0.03 sys = 0.08 CPU)
Result: FAIL
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Samuel Thibault
Nov 28, 2011, 8:00:02 PM11/28/11
to
Dominic Hargreaves, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 13:56:09 +0000, a écrit :
> ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
Pino apparently noticed that it'd be fixed by the pflocal or socket
> ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
patches, and will confirm
Samuel
Pino Toscano
Dec 1, 2011, 5:30:01 AM12/1/11
to
Alle martedì 29 novembre 2011, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> Dominic Hargreaves, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 13:56:09 +0000, a écrit :
> > ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
>
> Pino apparently noticed that it'd be fixed by the pflocal or socket
> patches, and will confirm
Yes, it looks like the latest hurd patches made this test pass.
> Dominic Hargreaves, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 13:56:09 +0000, a écrit :
> > ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
>
> Pino apparently noticed that it'd be fixed by the pflocal or socket
> patches, and will confirm
--
Pino Toscano
Samuel Thibault
Dec 1, 2011, 5:40:02 AM12/1/11
to
tags 650096 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Ok, thus marking as pending too.
thanks
Dominic Hargreaves
Dec 11, 2011, 8:00:02 AM12/11/11
to
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
On my test box with hurd 20111206-1 installed, this test still fails
for me. This is with perl 5.14.2-6, with the tests I now expect to be
passing based on bug reports re-enabled:
$ ./perl t/TEST -v ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t
t/../dist/IO/t/io_pipe....1..10
ok 1
ok 2
ok 3
ok 4
ok 5
ok 6
ok 7
ok 8
ok 10
FAILED--expected test 9, saw test 10
Failed 1 test out of 1, 0.00% okay.
../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t
Could you check whether the fix you expected to fix this is actually in
20111206-1, or whether there is some other issue?
(Trivial patch to re-enable test attached).
Thanks,
Dominic.
for me. This is with perl 5.14.2-6, with the tests I now expect to be
passing based on bug reports re-enabled:
$ ./perl t/TEST -v ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t
t/../dist/IO/t/io_pipe....1..10
ok 1
ok 2
ok 3
ok 4
ok 5
ok 6
ok 7
ok 8
ok 10
FAILED--expected test 9, saw test 10
Failed 1 test out of 1, 0.00% okay.
../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t
Could you check whether the fix you expected to fix this is actually in
20111206-1, or whether there is some other issue?
(Trivial patch to re-enable test attached).
Thanks,
Dominic.
Samuel Thibault
Dec 13, 2011, 12:30:02 PM12/13/11
to
Dominic Hargreaves, le Sun 11 Dec 2011 12:51:04 +0000, a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Alle martedì 29 novembre 2011, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> > > Dominic Hargreaves, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 13:56:09 +0000, a écrit :
> > > > ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
> > >
> > > Pino apparently noticed that it'd be fixed by the pflocal or socket
> > > patches, and will confirm
> >
> > Yes, it looks like the latest hurd patches made this test pass.
>
> On my test box with hurd 20111206-1 installed, this test still fails
> for me. This is with perl 5.14.2-6, with the tests I now expect to be
> passing based on bug reports re-enabled:
Could you please test with the recently-uploaded libc0.3 2.13-22? It
> > > Dominic Hargreaves, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 13:56:09 +0000, a écrit :
> > > > ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
> > >
> > > Pino apparently noticed that it'd be fixed by the pflocal or socket
> > > patches, and will confirm
> >
> > Yes, it looks like the latest hurd patches made this test pass.
>
> On my test box with hurd 20111206-1 installed, this test still fails
> for me. This is with perl 5.14.2-6, with the tests I now expect to be
> passing based on bug reports re-enabled:
brings parts of the fixes, possibly things that io_pipe.t needs.
Dominic Hargreaves
Dec 18, 2011, 11:00:02 AM12/18/11
to
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:25:18PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Dominic Hargreaves, le Sun 11 Dec 2011 12:51:04 +0000, a écrit :
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Alle martedì 29 novembre 2011, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> > > > Dominic Hargreaves, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 13:56:09 +0000, a écrit :
> > > > > ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
> > > >
> > > > Pino apparently noticed that it'd be fixed by the pflocal or socket
> > > > patches, and will confirm
> > >
> > > Yes, it looks like the latest hurd patches made this test pass.
> >
> > On my test box with hurd 20111206-1 installed, this test still fails
> > for me. This is with perl 5.14.2-6, with the tests I now expect to be
> > passing based on bug reports re-enabled:
>
> Could you please test with the recently-uploaded libc0.3 2.13-22? It
> brings parts of the fixes, possibly things that io_pipe.t needs.
That was with 2.13-22~0.1; I've retested with 2.13-23 and it still
> Dominic Hargreaves, le Sun 11 Dec 2011 12:51:04 +0000, a écrit :
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Alle martedì 29 novembre 2011, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> > > > Dominic Hargreaves, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 13:56:09 +0000, a écrit :
> > > > > ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t .. Failed 1/10 subtests
> > > >
> > > > Pino apparently noticed that it'd be fixed by the pflocal or socket
> > > > patches, and will confirm
> > >
> > > Yes, it looks like the latest hurd patches made this test pass.
> >
> > On my test box with hurd 20111206-1 installed, this test still fails
> > for me. This is with perl 5.14.2-6, with the tests I now expect to be
> > passing based on bug reports re-enabled:
>
> Could you please test with the recently-uploaded libc0.3 2.13-22? It
> brings parts of the fixes, possibly things that io_pipe.t needs.
fails.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
0 new messages