Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug#524710: Still intend to package pybox2d?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jonas Smedegaard

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 12:20:02 PM11/21/09
to
Hi,

I notice your ITP on pybox2d, and onder if you are still working on
this, as the bugreport has been without any activity since files back in
April.

If not, I would like to take over the task. The library is needed by
newer releases of sugar-pippy-activity.


Kind regards,

- Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private

signature.asc

Luca Bruno

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 12:50:02 PM11/21/09
to
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 06:07:08PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice your ITP on pybox2d, and onder if you are still working on
> this, as the bugreport has been without any activity since files
> back in April.
>
> If not, I would like to take over the task. The library is needed
> by newer releases of sugar-pippy-activity.
>

Feel free to take over it. I need it too but not now. I had a working
package but for a box2d packaged by myself. If you want I can send you the
debian/ dir.

Best regards,

--
http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System

signature.asc

Jonas Smedegaard

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 1:20:01 PM11/21/09
to
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 06:32:58PM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 06:07:08PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I notice your ITP on pybox2d, and onder if you are still working on
>> this, as the bugreport has been without any activity since files
>> back in April.
>>
>> If not, I would like to take over the task. The library is needed
>> by newer releases of sugar-pippy-activity.
>>
>
>Feel free to take over it. I need it too but not now.

Ok.


>I had a working package but for a box2d packaged by myself. If you want
>I can send you the debian/ dir.

Yes please, that'd be nice.

Even if I choose to package from sratch (I prefer using cdbs) I might
still learn something from close-reading your packaging style :-)

signature.asc
0 new messages