Lift under 2.8 timeframe ?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Francois Armand

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 1:37:38 PM11/12/09
to Lift
Hello guys,

I'm on the process of choosing a web framework for one of my (scala 2.8)
project. I know Tapestry 5, but as we are likely to have a lot of AJAX
to deal with, and T5 is not the best tool for that. I looked at gwt, but
I'm not sure I like what I'm seeing.

So, Lift could be a great option, but as I said, the project is in Scala
2.8, and so I would need to now if a time frame is broadly known for
Lift port to that version.
My problem is that I need to be able to start developping the web ui as
soon as possible (I'm quite under pressure for that), even if it means
living with a beta version of Lift for the next 3 months (or more).

So, my question is: does a branch for Lift with Scala 2.8 is expected
pretty soon (even if the final comes only in months, it's obvious that
it will be after Scala 2.8 final, and we do know that it is not yet
here), or does that seem pretty unlikely ?

Thanks in advance for the help,

--
Francois Armand
http://fanf42.blogspot.com

Timothy Perrett

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 1:56:46 PM11/12/09
to lif...@googlegroups.com
DPP has a local branch running a crippled version of lift that builds with 2.8

Is there any reason you could not work with 2.7.7 for your dev - it would get you most of the way there until 2.8 is released.

Cheers, Tim

David Pollak

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 2:13:10 PM11/12/09
to lif...@googlegroups.com

I'm going to get the "in earnest" Lift -> 2.8 port rolling tomorrow.  Hopefully, I'll have a branch that tracks the current Lift code running by mid next week.

We are *very* serious and *VERY* (lots of emphasis) committed to Scala 2.8.  I'm expecting that Lift 1.1 ships (currently plans for early Jan) as Scala 2.8 only or as two flavors (2.7.x and 2.8)
 

Thanks in advance for the help,

--
Francois Armand
http://fanf42.blogspot.com





--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics

Wilson MacGyver

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 2:16:39 PM11/12/09
to lif...@googlegroups.com
You feel this confident about Scala 2.8 release by Jan?

I'm curious because Scala 2.8 schedule seem to be
a fairly moving target.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:13 PM, David Pollak
<feeder.of...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are *very* serious and *VERY* (lots of emphasis) committed to Scala 2.8.
> I'm expecting that Lift 1.1 ships (currently plans for early Jan) as Scala
> 2.8 only or as two flavors (2.7.x and 2.8)


--
Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.

Timothy Perrett

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 2:18:41 PM11/12/09
to lif...@googlegroups.com
Its been a moving target since June ;-) Its gotta stop sometime, right?

Cheers, Tim

David Pollak

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 2:25:56 PM11/12/09
to lif...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Wilson MacGyver <wmac...@gmail.com> wrote:

You feel this confident about Scala 2.8 release by Jan?

Maybe Scala 2.8 gets pushed back a little and we push Lift 1.1 back a little.

If Scala 2.8 beta (which is coming very soon) is a complete disaster (I give this a < 10% probability), yeah we'll re-think things.  But in any case, there will be a 2.8 tracking branch of Lift.
 

I'm curious because Scala 2.8 schedule seem to be
a fairly moving target.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:13 PM, David Pollak
<feeder.of...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are *very* serious and *VERY* (lots of emphasis) committed to Scala 2.8.
> I'm expecting that Lift 1.1 ships (currently plans for early Jan) as Scala
> 2.8 only or as two flavors (2.7.x and 2.8)


--
Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.


Francois Armand

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 3:35:15 PM11/12/09
to lif...@googlegroups.com
David Pollak a écrit :

> I'm going to get the "in earnest" Lift -> 2.8 port rolling tomorrow.
> Hopefully, I'll have a branch that tracks the current Lift code running
> by mid next week.

That's so a great new :)

> We are *very* serious and *VERY* (lots of emphasis) committed to Scala
> 2.8. I'm expecting that Lift 1.1 ships (currently plans for early Jan)
> as Scala 2.8 only or as two flavors (2.7.x and 2.8)

I never doubted that, it was just that as long as 2.8 wasn't released, I
didn't know how much time you will to spend on it.

So, that's a really interesting new, it will have it's weight in the
choice :)

Francois Armand

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 3:36:44 PM11/12/09
to lif...@googlegroups.com
Wilson MacGyver a écrit :

> You feel this confident about Scala 2.8 release by Jan?
>
> I'm curious because Scala 2.8 schedule seem to be
> a fairly moving target.

My finger is telling me that we are going to see a "release candidate
for the release candidate" hummm tomorrow ;)

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages