Message from discussion
The Loyal Opposition
Received: by 10.142.52.20 with SMTP id z20mr786419wfz.44.1295123444253;
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:30:44 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: liftweb@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.142.2.41 with SMTP id 41ls4937056wfb.0.p; Sat, 15 Jan 2011
12:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.125.16 with SMTP id x16mr780438wfc.43.1295123439303;
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.125.16 with SMTP id x16mr780437wfc.43.1295123439161;
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <je...@ingolfs.dk>
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m3si3009160wfl.5.2011.01.15.12.30.38;
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.210.45 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of je...@ingolfs.dk) client-ip=209.85.210.45;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.210.45 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of je...@ingolfs.dk) smtp.mail=je...@ingolfs.dk
Received: by pzk2 with SMTP id 2so791964pzk.4
for <liftweb@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:30:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.47.21 with SMTP id u21mr1945014wfu.258.1295123438853; Sat,
15 Jan 2011 12:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.87.4 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:30:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <15982488.404.1295106721097.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcb5>
References: <AANLkTimyNc1NH91QzjGsKjNNYNLX=B3yfopDg0H+uBD6@mail.gmail.com>
<15982488.404.1295106721097.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcb5>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:30:38 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTint5aHno2YLdSotR+hcZakAYWKi3jui6hqCcs01@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Lift] Re: The Loyal Opposition
From: Jeppe Nejsum Madsen <je...@ingolfs.dk>
To: liftweb@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 4:52 PM, TylerWeir <tyler.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm happy you wrote this and in the manner you did.
>
> The list was transitioning to a place I didn't want to visit due to
> complaints and what I saw as whining.
>
> Here's to amicable discourse.
Couldn't agree more. There will always be different opinions on the
best way to do things, but we must be able to discuss those opnions
objectively.
/Jeppe