Lift Google Group

Re: [Lift] ANN: Akka 0.6 is released

jbo...@gmail.com (Jonas Bonér) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:06:24 UT

Thanks Tim. You are part of the story. Thanks.
2010/1/5 Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>

Re: [Lift] ANN: Akka 0.6 is released

timo...@getintheloop.eu (Timothy Perrett) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:59:36 UT

Congratulations all... you guys have put so much effort into Akka and its a really great framework; cant wait to see what is in store down the track!
Cheers, Tim

ANN: Akka 0.6 is released

jbo...@gmail.com (Jonas Bonér) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:34:32 UT

Hi.
I am proud to announce the release of Akka 0.6. It is a major release in
many ways.
Many people have made this happen. Especially the great
team<[link]> but
also many of the users on the mailing list.
Thank you all.
Download Akka 0.6
here<[link]>

Re: [lift] Lift based backend server subscribing via amqp

timo...@getintheloop.eu (Timothy Perrett) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:09:31 UT

In what way do you mean "is mapper worth it"?
What kind of system is it? do you need ACID or BASE? What kind of load
will the system be under? Do you need it to be distributed? You are
not restricted to Mapper, you could use JPA or whatever persistence
you want with lift.
If you just want to make a pretty simple service tier, then sure, Lift

Re: Lift based backend server subscribing via amqp

timo...@getintheloop.eu (Timothy Perrett) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:06:28 UT

Pushed to master - will be in hudson jars in a few hours.
Cheers, Tim

Re: [Lift] Re: Errors not shown after AJAX form submit

a...@warski.org (Adam Warski) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:10:50 UT

Hello,
I think I more or less understand :)
Here's the defect: [link]
By the way, do you have any idea why my example application produces such weird results?
I looked in the RequestVar code and didn't find anything there that would make it behave differently in the two scenarios.

Re: CometActor and JQuery

martinsema...@googlemail.com (martinsemails@googlemail.com) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:28:59 UT

Thanks again,
what i want to do is some stuff with a canvas element, where changes
are reflected to the other clients. This why i think the SHtml things
do not fit for me. I now think the best way would be to use the
partialUpdate() of the CometActor to send changes to clients and may
be a JsonHandler to to get the updates to Server.

Re: multiple forms on a page.

daiw...@gmail.com (daiwhea) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:47:00 UT

Thanks David. But this seems not work as wished. It will meet some
error:
[INFO] Compiling 1 source files to /home/daiwhea/myworks/java/
liftonscala/MapperBBS/target/c lasses
/home/daiwhea/myworks/java/lif tonscala/MapperBBS/src/main/sc ala/com/
vapee/main/snippet/GuestBook.s cala:60: error: forward reference

Re: [lift] Lift based backend server subscribing via amqp

timo...@getintheloop.eu (Timothy Perrett) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:06:57 UT

[link]
Fixed and on review board.
Cheers, Tim

Re: [Lift] Re: [lift] Lift based backend server subscribing via amqp

timo...@getintheloop.eu (Timothy Perrett) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:57:42 UT

We don't accept patches for legal reasons. However, I will upgrade the
module today for you - giving a similar result.
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone

Re: Errors not shown after AJAX form submit

marius.dan...@gmail.com (Marius) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:00:43 UT

I think the difference is in showAll scope. It was implemented for non
Ajax context (just for msgs snippet) but it wasn't implemented for
Ajax (as far as I can tell).
Ajax notices (if there are any) are appended to user's JsCmd response.
But this code has no idea about the showAll snippet attribute.

Re: [Lift] Errors not shown after AJAX form submit

a...@warski.org (Adam Warski) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:37:51 UT

Hello,
Ah, I didn't spot this. I only have:
<lift:Msgs showAll="true"/>
which would suggest that it should show all errors.
And anyway, why does it work then with normal form submit, and doesn't with ajax form submit?
Adam

Re: QueryParams and joins

mads...@gmail.com (Mads Hartmann) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:10:28 UT

My ultimate goal would be to only pull out the top x users. I'm
currently using the following code to achieve this:
TagUser.findAll(By(TagUser.tag , this.id)).map(_.user.obj.open_ !)
.sort(_.followers_count.is > _.followers_count.is)
.take(x)
But im concerned that this creates an instance for each of the users

Re: Simple deployment of Lift apps on Jetty/Nginx

feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com (David Pollak) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:41:18 UT

You can have more than one domain per IP address served by different
applications with Nginx up front. You can swap from one instance of an
application to another (semi-seamless upgrades) with Nginx up front. You
can front many different Lift instances (some running on other machines)
with Nginx up front (there are some high volume Lift sites that do this).

Re: [Lift] IE6 Strict mode - skip header

feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com (David Pollak) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:35:35 UT

Lift automatically detects IE and IE6 and "does the right thing" in terms of
headers as well as the <?xml ?> header. Please take a look at the HTML and
headers actually emitted when IE6 is detected... it should be correct.