Hey Greg,
Im not sure that drawing comparisons to google is right? IMO, they
dont do the same job...? I see why one would see similarities, but
isnt google's purpose to find the sources of information, where as
wolfram's aim is to provide an objective set of answers based on
"human" input;
http://www.wolframalpha.com/about.html
Cheers, Tim
On Jun 11, 7:14 pm, Meredith Gregory <
lgreg.mered...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Could you enlighten me on the coolness of Wolfram Alpha? My initial forays
> and comparison to Google were depressingly unfavorable, but excellent if
> you're looking for some humor. See the summary below.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> --greg
>
> My standard test of a search engine: polyadic pi-calculus
> Google result: first hit is the Edinburgh tutorial prepared by Milner, still
> the best reference
> Wolfram Alpha: "*Wolfram|Alpha isn't sure what to do with your input.
> Related inputs to try: pi.*"
>
> This test, by the way, should be right in W|A's sweet spot.
>
> My next test: phred weasley
> Google result: Did you mean: *fred*
> weasley<
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en...>and
> then several links to Harry Potter
> W|A result: "*Wolfram|Alpha isn't sure what to do with your input. Related
> inputs to try: Wesley.*"
>
> My next test: fred weasley
> Google result: the top Harry Potter sites
> W|A result:
>
> Interpreting "weasley" as "wesley"
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> Assuming Fred (female) | Use Fred
> (male)<javascript:applyAssumption(1,'*DPClash.GivenNameE.fred-_*FredUnitedS tatesMaleName-')>instead
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> Input interpretation:[image: Fred (female given name) | Wesley (male given
> name)]
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> Latest information for US births:[image: | Fred | Wesley\nrank | 985th
> (1929) | 194th (2008)\nfraction | 1 in 21277 people (0.0047%) (1929) | 1 in
> 1058 people (0.094%) (2008)\nnumber | 54 people per year (1929) | 2033
> people per year (2008)]
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> History for US births:Log
> scale<javascript:asynchronousPod('pod.jsp?id=MSP41119646i0hb5a62fg000004fe2 11d660aid2aa&s=61',%20'0300','fred+weasley','',0)>
> More<javascript:asynchronousPod('pod.jsp?id=MSP41219646i0hb5a62fg0000058i05 06e54df6b4e&s=61',%20'0300','fred+weasley','',0)>
> Fraction:[image: Fraction]
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Timothy Perrett
> <
timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote: