This sounds pretty pragmatic. The last thing we want to do is rush out
a version of Lift that is 2.8 compatible an devalue the release
because it appears to be full of bugs.
Ironically, I thought they would be making more of the RC1 here at
Scala Days, but they arnt for some reason.
Your plan sounds good, lets go for it!
Cheers, Tim
On Apr 15, 3:20 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
/Jeppe
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
That said, I have synced up the respective library versions and nuked a
couple of obvious compilation errors in 280_port_refresh.
I have also temporarily disabled tests on this branch (primarily to
reduce Hudson stress). Would re-enable test the moment the compilers
issues are sorted out and we have an RC2.
Meanwhile, we need to sort out the library dependencies, viz.
scalamodules and scalajpa.
scalajpa SNAPSHOT is available for 2.8.0.Beta1. I'll update it to
2.8.0.RC1 or RC2. Heiko can probably take up lift-osgi - Heiko?
Cheers, Indrajit
scalajpa SNAPSHOT is available for 2.8.0.Beta1. I'll update it to 2.8.0.RC1 or RC2. Heiko can probably take up lift-osgi - Heiko?