Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js
abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several
redundancies:
1. JsCmds has ~> method for referencing member of "objects" (i.e
elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have >> method that "chains" a
JQueryLeft with JQueryRight
2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp
already have the support for building expressions, composing them,
chaining expressions etc.
My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific
things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to
some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary.
If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my
backlog.
Thoughts?
Br's,
Marius
Mads
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
-------------------------------------
On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can it be changed with a deprecation phase?
>
> -------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------
On Mar 7, 10:21 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript parts.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------
If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my
backlog.
On Mar 7, 11:11 pm, Heiko Seeberger <heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
+!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Peter Robinett <pe...@bubblefoundry.com> wrote:
>
> +!
>
> Does this translate to "I vote you must do this?" ;-)
``I vote to do this, and throw an exception if the vote is empty''?
--
Jim Wise
jw...@draga.com
On Mar 8, 9:47 am, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Peter Robinett <pe...@bubblefoundry.com>wrote:
>
> > +!
>
> Does this translate to "I vote you must do this?" ;-)
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 7, 11:11 pm, Heiko Seeberger <heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On 7 March 2010 19:37, Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my
> > > > backlog.
>
> > > Makes a lot of sense for me. Go for it!
>
> > > Heiko
>
> > > Company: weiglewilczek.com
> > > Blog: heikoseeberger.name
> > > Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger
> > > OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org
> > > Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Lift" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com<liftweb%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com >
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890