I'm subscribed to this list, so if there are Lift specific problems I
should see them fairly promptly.
My understanding is that Lift on 2.7.2 is still a work in progress, so
seeing as the Eclipse plugin requires 2.7.2 it might be early days for
that combination.
As ever I'm keen to make the Lift and Eclipse experience as pain free
as possible, but as ever I need help from the Lift community. Please
try Lift with 2.7.2 and Eclipse and get your feedback to me (tho'
obviously generic 2.7.2 non-Eclipse issues should go to the EPFL Trac
as usual).
Cheers,
Miles
--
Miles Sabin
tel: +44 (0)1273 720 779
mobile: +44 (0)7813 944 528
skype: milessabin
Have you sent bug reports my way for these?
Eclipse plugin releases are now simultaneous with scala releases, so
it's the same: 2.7.2.RC6.
Have you sent bug reports my way for these?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Alex Boisvert <bois...@intalio.com> wrote:
> From a user perspective, I'd say it's getting better every month but still
> has many rough edges. For example, it's quite easy to get the compile/error
> log out of control on larger projects. And at that point, I usually revert
> to JEdit to get stuff done.
Thanks.
This is pretty minor tho' ... Eclipse is just showing a subset of the
errors in a known to be non-compiling project. I agree things should
be better, but you'll find that as you fix the errors in your project
the set of errors that Eclipse is reporting will converge to the true
set of errors.
> My top lame excuses for not creating a bug earlier were that:
> 1) I was hoping it would get fixed in the next snapshot :) since it did
> doesn't seem like something that's specific to my project
See above. Feel free to disagree, but this isn't quite at the top of
my list of priorities.
> 2) I didn't have a small reproductible test case (my last bugs were marked
> as not-reproducible)
In this case, that's fine ... it's a known problem.
> 3) Sean's comments on my mailing list made me realize I use a lot of
> "unsupported" features that come from the JDT but are not really wired to
> the Scala plugin yet. I don't know if "Clean All Project" is even supported
> but I use it all the time to come back to a consistent state (with Scala and
> Java projects)
Sean is being Chicken Little again I'm afraid, and in any case, what
you're seeing here isn't related to the JDT.
Yes, there are many JDT features which aren't yet wired up to the
Scala plugin properly, but if you just ignore them things should work
fairly smoothly. In particular cleaning all projects should work just
fine.
This is pretty minor tho' ... Eclipse is just showing a subset of the
errors in a known to be non-compiling project. I agree things should
be better, but you'll find that as you fix the errors in your project
the set of errors that Eclipse is reporting will converge to the true
set of errors.
> My top lame excuses for not creating a bug earlier were that:> 1) I was hoping it would get fixed in the next snapshot :) since it didSee above. Feel free to disagree, but this isn't quite at the top of
> doesn't seem like something that's specific to my project
my list of priorities.
Yes, there are many JDT features which aren't yet wired up to the
Scala plugin properly, but if you just ignore them things should work
fairly smoothly. In particular cleaning all projects should work just
fine.