Container vars look great. (
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Alex Black <
a...@alexblack.ca> wrote:
> > The stateless stuff in 2.2 looks intriguing, great addition to Lift's
> > capabilities. But, even people like myself who like their state in
> > the URL *sometimes* want session state. :) We use session state for
> > prices/currency, and what camera you last used, and other stuff in the
> > future, so I think a pure stateless model (which is what I gather the
> > 2.2 stateless stuff is) might not work for us.
>
> Ah... but the ContainerVars might. What they do is make sure that all state
> is stored in the container (so you can do clustering) but bar any
> functionality (like associating functions with GUIDs) that can't be
> obviously serialized.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > I'd love to see you start using Lift 2.2... particularly the stateless
> > > session features. You tend to be a bug magnet (bugs get magically
> > attracted
> > > to you) and I'd love to get any bugs flushed out of the stateless
> > sessions.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Lift" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
lif...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to