Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Let's hammer out some details!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Adam  
View profile  
 More options Sep 25 2008, 2:42 pm
From: Adam <adam.p...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Sep 25 2008 2:42 pm
Subject: Re: Let's hammer out some details!
Actually, let's stick to talk regarding the overall direction of the
Lifehacker Coders project here--things like scope, organization,
communication. I.e., this post is for talking about how the process
could work. I've put up a separate post for collecting application
ideas post here:

http://groups.google.com/group/lifehacker-coders/t/acab5af395954f37

On Sep 25, 11:29 am, Adam <adam.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you're here, that means you read the call for contributors on
> Lifehacker and are interested in contributing to the Lifehacker Coders
> project. This is an experiment for me (Adam) in creating original
> content for Lifehacker in the form of simple applications built using
> AutoHotkey.

> I chose AutoHotkey because it's a scripting language I'm familiar
> with, and development with AutoHotkey is relatively fast and simple.
> The problem (and strength) of AutoHotkey is that it's easy to script a
> solution for yourself, but often those solutions are never abstracted
> in a form that others can easily use. My assumption is that people are
> much more likely to use an actual executable application over a script
> that requires installing AHK, for example, so abstracting AHK ideas
> into executables with GUIs is important.

> Almost every software project I've developed for Lifehacker is an AHK
> application, including:

> Texter:http://lifehacker.com/software/texter/lifehacker-code-texter-windows-...
> Rocker:http://lifehacker.com/software/exclusive-lifehacker-download-for-wind...
> Swept Away:http://lifehacker.com/software/downloads/lifehacker-code-swept-away-w...
> ClickWhen:http://lifehacker.com/software/exclusive-lifehacker-download/automate...
> DVD Play:http://lifehacker.com/360658/browse-and-play-your-ripped-dvds-with-dv...
> Better Rename:http://lifehacker.com/355580/mimic-vistas-file-rename-feature-in-xp
> DVD Rip:http://lifehacker.com/355281/dvd-rip-automates-one+click-dvd-ripping

> I have experience in AHK and with programming, but I'm far from
> expert. I learn a lot from commenters every time I write up an AHK
> post, so I'm looking forward to the knowledge and ideas you can bring.

> I want this to be as collaborative an effort as possible, so I'm open
> to hearing whatever ideas you might have--whether we're talking
> application ideas, ideas on how the process should work, etc.

> I'm really excited about this experiment, and if you've made it this
> far, I hope you are too. So, without further ado, let's hammer out
> some details.

> (Incidentally, I'd love to host our code on Google Code but have no
> experience using SVN there. If anyone does, let's talk!)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google