In this case, I think it makes a lot of sense to not include
those attributes in pax_restricted archives.
If you need any pointers putting together the patch, let
us know.
Cheers,
Tim
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libarchive-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to libarchiv...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to libarchive-disc...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libarchive-discuss?hl=en.
>
Yes.
Tim
I don't see a reason to include those fields at all. I would just drop them.
Joerg
That would be even simpler.
Tim
I committed r2563 that just drops these from libarchive/trunk. (I've not gotten any
feedback from anyone who actually uses these and they seem to
just be causing problems.)
Note: If your primary concern is interoperability with gnutar, you
might also consider the basic gnutar format writer that's now
in libarchive/trunk. It's not very complete but it does handle
long filenames and long linknames.
Cheers,
Tim