Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Learning Registry
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Paradata Model
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Daniel Rehak  
View profile  
 More options Sep 21 2011, 9:34 am
From: Daniel Rehak <daniel.re...@learningregistry.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:34:07 -0400
Local: Wed, Sep 21 2011 9:34 am
Subject: Paradata Model
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Steve and I have revised the proposed paradata model and updated the
document:  http://goo.gl/Cq6im
(the full JSON examples at the end have not been fully updated).

The model was simplified to have 4 top level elements: actor, action,
object, related objects
Actor, action, object can all be further refined with 4 subelements:
description/attributes, measure. date, context

We opted for consistency and expressiveness in allowing these 4 subelements
to be applied to the major elements, recognizing that you can express the
same activity in different forms.

The model will be the topic of discussion on our call @ 16:00 Eastern on
9/22. We're looking for feedback and more examples to test the model. We
hope to conclude the discussion this week so we can finalize the JSON and
begin testing.

- Dan

--
Daniel R. Rehak, Ph.D.

ADL Technical Advisor
Skype: drrehak
Email:  daniel.re...@gmail.com
            daniel.rehak....@adlnet.gov
Twitter: @danielrehak
Web:   learningregistry.org
            adlnet.gov
            lsal.org
Google Voice: +1 412 301 3040
Tel:       +1 412 931 7317
Work:   +1 412 931 7319
Mob:    +1 412 805 7683


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
joe hobson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Sep 27 2011, 2:17 am
From: joe hobson <joehob...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:17:08 -0700
Local: Tues, Sep 27 2011 2:17 am
Subject: Re: [Learningreg-Dev] Paradata Model
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

As discussed on the last design call, I've added examples of how we would use this model to publish paradata from the Brokers of Expertise system. For the most part, it was not difficult to fit our expressions into this model, and I think it will be easy for a consumer to make sense of the data.

One area that was a little unsure of was when a user tags a resource. I added the paradata as a description subelement under the verb, but it looks like the preferred activity stream method is to add them as subelement properties of the object. I think either could be acceptable, but I'm curious which would be better for service processing, either on the node, or on a system consuming the data.

... .joe

On Sep 21, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Daniel Rehak wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google