Hi Nellie,I am grateful for changes made by Patricia and would prefer if the assigned instructors be the ones to do so. I am a bit sensitive when it comes to aesthetics and correct use of language.However this does not mean that I would not collaborate with an individual and work closely on code with them to help them develop their pages. There should be an understanding between anyone making changes, but this would not apply to the assigned instructors Nellie and Patricia.Hallam
Hallam here.Is there a space limit for the amount of material that can go into the sandbox?Or maybe my browser is playing repeated tricks on me.Hallam
Dear Hallam,
There is no space limit on any of the pages on WikiEducator. I would however recommend that if you are developing materials, to either link your user page to the Wiki Content page under the relevant subject matter, if it exists or create a new link and page under a new subject area you assign on the Content page.
For instance: http://www.wikieducator.org/Chemistry. Have a look at content page and you will know what I mean http://www.wikieducator.org/Content If you still have questions, please do not hesitate to write.
Warm regards,
Patricia
Dear Hallam,
Being new to the Open Source Software movement as you are, I appreciate your comments. Please note however that the ability to make changes, add/delete or enhance also your contribution, and not only done by the instructors, is exactly what we do. This is the wiki way. It is a transparent open process for anyone to see or add to, which under the best circumstances will make your end product even better. We work collaboratively and anyone can make changes to any page. Good intentions are taken for granted as most people go into documents to perform an enhancement task. You will always have the option to revert the changes, if you don’t agree or compare previous and current versions under the history tab. You also have the option to put your content on your own watchlist, which will alert you to any changes made on your page(s).
You as a member of the community will be able to do the same on other pages. I know it will take some getting used to because this way of thinking/concept is new and because we are are used to or are still working in closed environments but working in the wiki way is exactly the beauty of an open content development for a better outcome.
Warm regards,
Patricia
Thanks to all comments. Will review.Hallam
Hi Nellie
I couldn’t see a discussion on the Groups page…so I assume I just respond to this email?
See me comments below
Cheers jennip
From:
learning4cont...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:learning4cont...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of NELLIE DEUTSCH
Sent: Wednesday, 3 December 2008
10:17 PM
To: learning4cont...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [eL4C15] Re: Outline
missing
Hi Everyone,
I would like to bring up a discussion question on helping vs. doing things for
someone else and the value of both for learning. In addition, I would be
interested in your thoughts on the following:
1. Is there a fine line to collaboration and interference? Yes because our perception of something will be
different to another person’s perception of the same thing. That is what
makes the world and interacting with others so interesting!
2. How free or at liberty are we to make changes on others' pages? Wikis are all about collaboration and
my understanding is that everyone is at liberty to add or change any page. However,
having said this, our own user page may be a slightly different case, as it is
a personal expression of ourself. For example: if I wrote something about
myself such as “My name is Jenni Parker and I live in Perth, WA” and
someone amended the content to …”Perth, Western Australia” I
might be offended because the words I use to describe myself are my choice. However
I may also reflect on it and think to myself, “well, yes that is better
because maybe some people don’t know that “WA” is the
shortened term for “Western
Australia”. So on this page…maybe it is
better not to change but to recommend improvements ie: add suggestions
3. Should there be some kind of agreement/s on the process of collaborating on
WE? I think maybe there just
needs to be some clear guidelines for people new to wiki’s about what is
acceptable etiquette for collaborating (especially when you didn’t start
the page). I am new to wiki’s and I am very hestitant about editing others
pages. For example: I’ve added my name to the “ELearning_T4T”
project – which has a list of participants at the top of the page (which
I like, because I like to know who I am collaborating with), but now what do I
do from here? Should I contact the course creator? Do I just add what I
think appropriate? What is the accepted “norm” in this situation? Also
on the Contents page, there is a link to a course about HRM, this course
includes a section on Training & Development (which is my field of
knowledge). Not much has been added to this page and some of the information
(from my perspective – from Australia) is not correct. This
course has no participant list nor an invitation to join. If I wanted to collaborate
do I just edit this page…or should I contact the originator and discuss
it - what is the accepted etiquette?
4. What would work for you? Some
simple guidelines (suggestions) for collaborating – see above. Maybe they
already exist & I haven’t come across them yet.
----- Original Message -----From: NELLIE DEUTSCH
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry® de Vodafone