Chris,
That's a nice effort. It shows a considerably stronger libration in
latitude, but similar lighting, to that which will be observed at the
currently announced impact time of 2009 Oct 09 11:30 UT.
I'm attaching a comparison of your image with that taken by Kurt
Fisher 2 hours earlier:
http://groups.google.com/group/lcross_observation/msg/cf5d37b9287da695
and one taken by Mario Weigand last October (cropped from a full disk mosaic):
http://www.skytrip.de/monvid241.htm
Unlike most of what I post, these have not been processed with LTVT,
but rather Mario's image has simply been rotated 4.1° clockwise to
make the Moon's rotation axis vertical, and the other two photos have
been enlarged to the same scale (a 7349 pixel diameter lunar disk) and
rotated to match. In addition Kurt's image has also been stretched by
a factor of 4/3 in the direction perpendicular to what appear to be
video scan lines, although I don't know if that is the correct factor.
Each image is labeled with the longitude/latitude of the Sub-observer
("SO") and Sub-solar ("SS") points. The former two numbers are
commonly referred to as the "librations", while the commonly used
"colongitude" of the Sun is (90° - longitude of SS point).
That information is based on the following data:
Fisher image: 2009 Aug 11 09:37 UT from (-111.867°, +40.767°)
Kitting image: 2009 Aug 11 11:20 UT from (-122.03594°, +37.64678°)
Weigand image: 2008 Oct 20 03:30 UT from (+8.7°, +50.1°)
For comparison, from the IRTF facility in Hawaii (-155.47220°,
19.82612°) at the impact time cited above, observers will see SO =
-2.16°/-3.69° and SS = -68.2°/-1.51°.
The images are registered on Malapert Alpha (the bright peak
bordering, on the left, the top of the large V-shaped indentation on
the limb), have the differences in libration about their point are
quite evident. For example, the large crater under the "-3.46° SS"
label in Mario's image (Simpelius) is shifted to the extreme upper
right in the two images above it. Likewise the limb area to the south
of Malapert Alpha is noticeably stretched in the first two views
relative to its appearance in the third; and undoubtedly features not
visible in the latter have rotated into view in the former.
Looking at the numbers, Mario's image is closest to the expected
impact view in terms of both solar latitude and libration in latitude,
but the libration in longitude will be skewed a bit towards that show
in the two recent photos.
In comparing the images, the two main surprises to me were: (1) that
your version shows faint limb detail that was visible to Kurt's setup
only using his "hyper-exposure" technique; and (2) that Mario's image,
with the Sun 1° higher, shows so little additional sunlit detail
inside the "hole" area. I had formerly imagined that Mario's image
showed most of the detail that was likely to be visible, but this
seems to be saying that (as in Kurt's case) a deeper exposure (or a
different processing routine) might have brought out more.
The next opportunity to see the Moon with the Sun at a longitude of
-68.2° (matching the impact lighting) will be on 2009 Sep 09 at 23:05
UT. The Sun's latitude will be -1.17°, considerably closer to the
-1.51° expected on impact night than were the August observations. The
Moon will not be visible from the United States at that time, however
it could be imaged from Europe, Africa and much of Asia (but not the
Far East). Perhaps some of the excellent Russian astrophotographers
could be encouraged to take a look. From Kiev at that hour the Moon
will be seen with SO = -5.06°/-5.60°. That would be a good supplement
to the Weigand image.
It would also, if possible, be helpful for imagers in that part of the
world to post high resolution photos taken on September 7 and 8. They
would serve as a useful guide to this part of the Moon for observers
in the other half of the world who might be setting up for the October
9 impact, and trying to locate the impact site, on October 7 and 8.
-- Jim
P.S. to Chris:
Labeling at the photos seems premature, at least for potential impact
observers, until the impact target has been announced.
--
P.S. to the group moderators:
It was long ago announced that a new NASA-hosted website was being set
up ("as we speak") to accommodate and organize the flood of amateur
images expected leading up to and during the impact event. With less
than seven weeks to impact, I wonder if any progress has been made on
the development of the new site?
Random postings about LCROSS-related imaging opportunities made by
members of this group on various internet forums have elicited very
little reaction. A call for pre-impact amateur images of the Moon's
south pole from Africa, Asia and Europe on 2009 Sep 09 at 23:05 UT, if
desired by the LCROSS scientists, would seem much more effective, and
the response better organized and more accessible if announced from,
and the results submitted to, such an official NASA site.
--