LCROSS_Observation Google Group

hi

2009-12-23T16:41:18Z

Dear friends:
eleshopexm.com This is a very good network platform,
which operations are: motorcycles, brand-name mobile phones, MP3, MP4,
notebook computers, television, etc.; quality assurance warranty, and
absolute credit guarantee; because it is purchasing from the
manufacturer , the price is cheap, are now being sold at wholesale

Re: [LCROSS_OBS: 1291] South Pole, 26 November 2009

2009-12-03T17:17:17Z

Nasa should have just hired you, George, instead of spending millions on
LRO! Great image.

--
Jake Burkart
Multimedia Director
The Collaborative

Re: [LCROSS_OBS: 1291] South Pole, 26 November 2009

2009-12-03T16:51:50Z

Nice image George.
I think I also see the peak that got in the way of the LCROSS impact
in Cabeus too.
Cabeus is in the dark just past the terminator.
Clif

South Pole, 26 November 2009

2009-12-03T16:24:51Z

Mosaic 2 images at 26 November 2009, because I have very much turbulence
I take very sort videos 300-400 frames only. Image processing only from
Registax.

[link]

Technical details
Telescope Orion Optics 10 inch at f/6.3, camera Fire-i 785 Unibrain,

Re: [LCROSS_OBS: 1283] Re: LCROSS Team report schedule

2009-11-28T22:01:54Z

Attached is an independent assessment of the location and masking of
the LCROSS impact point based on the recently-released Kaguya digital
elevation model of the Moon's south pole (the 64 points per degree of
latitude version), as rendered by LTVT_v0_20:

[link]

sexyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

2009-11-11T00:49:48Z

ACTRESS DETAILS:
[link]

SMS-JOKES-COMICS-FUN:
[link]

TRANSPORT:
[link]

POLITICAL LEADERS:
[link]

AUTOMOBILES:
[link]

Re: Cabeus_A1 images from Gemini GMOS (2009-Sep-11-13:12UT) and suggested pointing sequence

2009-11-10T02:22:18Z

Speaking of the "LCROSS Ejecta Flux Predictions" graph, those who
follow such things may recall that some of us have been struggling to
understand the varying photometric units used on the LCROSS charts.

The upper (red) line in this particular chart peaks at a spectral
radiance of about 9x10^-10 W m^-2 micron^-1 arc-sec^-2 in the visible,

Re: [LCROSS_OBS: 1286] View this page "LCROSS FAQ"

2009-11-08T10:41:21Z

Thanks so much for this very very comprehensive information , I enjoyed the
Sky & Telescope second blog page on the subject in particular . Tomorrow
evening I plan to use some of it in my Moon talk .

Deirdre

2009/11/8 Jim Mosher <jimmos...@gmail.com>

--
Deirdre Kelleghan
Vice Char IFAS

View this page "LCROSS FAQ"

2009-11-08T00:36:44Z

Click on [link]
- or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.

Re: Cabeus_A1 images from Gemini GMOS (2009-Sep-11-13:12UT) and suggested pointing sequence

2009-11-08T00:21:10Z

I notice there is a brief description of the mysterious "Ejecta Flux
Predictions" diagram:

[link]

Re: [LCROSS_OBS: 1283] Re: LCROSS Team report schedule

2009-11-07T23:43:36Z

As a rough check on the accuracy of the Goddard-LOLA south polar
masking simulations, I tried rotating and rescaling one of Antonin
Bouchez' Palomar images:
[link]
to match Slide 9 ("California 50 km") in Tony Colaprete's presentation:
[link]

Re: LCROSS Team report schedule

2009-11-05T02:45:24Z

Kurt -

Thank you for posting the revised graphic at:

[link]

illustrating your concerns about the Goddard-LOLA masking simulations
in LCROSS Principal Investigator Tony Colaprete's October 2, 2009
target area presentation at:

Re: LCROSS Team report schedule

2009-11-03T19:46:34Z

<snip>

I have uploaded a markup of the GSC-LOLA graphic that illustrates the
inconsistency in the simulation. - Clear Skies, Kurt

[link]

Re: LCROSS Team report schedule

2009-11-02T21:27:29Z

<snip>

That is not what I said. One cannot look relatively down and see the
2.5km marker apparently floating relatively above the rim of Cabeus to
the immediate west. That is what the graphic shows. The lowest green
strip on the dipstick or "candy cane" marks 2.0 to 2.5km. It should
appear to be below the rim; it appears to float above the level of the

Re: LCROSS Team report schedule

2009-11-02T05:36:05Z

The impact certainly occurred in a region that was in shadow at the
time of impact. That it was "a very deep and very dark
PSR" (permanently shadowed region) is much less obvious to me. The
few graphics I've seen of permanently shadowed regions represented
calculations based on ground-based radar data. Areas like the region