Ewing and Becraft on the 1871 District of Columbia Constitution, etc.
Bob Hurt
Huntsville Alabama attorney and activist Larry Becraft spends more time than most attorneys trying to debunk patriot myths. He has done it for so many years that he threatens nearly daily to abandon the patriot movement and leave the their myth advocates to whatever fate befalls them. He has not abandoned patriots yet because of his own patriotism, and because of his sense of duty to guide people away from the myths that will spell the doom for many. How do they spell doom? Well, people embrace them and follow them, and then end up doing behaviors that get them in trouble with government, often resulting in jail time and loss of fortune.
I endorse Larry’s efforts 100% and I share his motives, to the extent that I have correctly identified them above. Because I consider myself a student and not a guru, I believe I can fall prey to patriot myths, and when that happens, I might embrace the myths in ignorance, for lack of refuting evidence, or for lack of requiring proofs from proponents of the myths or studying the proofs provided, or from lazy lack of study or lack of easy access to proof sources.
People sometimes quote from court cases in order to prove a point, but also many times those quotes don’t reflect the sense of the ruling or of the case, or those quotes don’t have binding power on other courts because they consist of commentary (dicta), not rulings. Others, trusting the quotations, pass them on, and they become patriot “myths” because they don’t reflect the truth.
What does Larry Becraft do in his “spare” time? He debunks those myths especially when they take on epic arenas of patriot consciousness. And you can find much of his debunking, available for public scrutiny and comment, on his web site:
Memorize that url (uniform resource locator). Use it. Often. And if you find any falsehoods on it, feel free to send your comments to me or Larry for resolution. Neither one of us hides from sincere truth seekers.
Above all, remember this: The Truth Can Withstand Honest Investigation, and, You Can Know the Law. To that end, I provide the following information.
Now as for the reason I write this, recently litigation consultant Luis Ewing, in order to set the record straight, promulgated his declaration about the relevant history and nature of the governments in the U.S. and States. He sought to explain why people should not listen to other gurus because those gurus will mislead them because the gurus themselves don’t know the truth. And he explained his view of the things to some extent.
Without necessarily knowing who authored the comments, Larry Becraft responded to them in the below rebuttal. He addressed the question of the 1871 DC Constitituon – the comments asserted that that the United States Constitution isn’t what people think it is, and got changed in 1871. Larry posted his rebuttal on his web site.
I have appended below some comments from Luis Ewing. He seems fully to believe all that he asserted. He sent them directly to me and to many other people in order to denigrate tax system and other gurus, and to divert people from taking their advice, and going to him instead for solutions to associated legal problems.
I asked Luis to tone down his comments and to structure them for easier study. He explained that he saves such work for legal pleadings people pay him to write. And he asserted repeatedly that he can give people virtual, functional remedy where attorneys and other gurus fail utterly. He admits that he charges about 30% less than attorneys, and that he gives services that product results, for which he claims a track record. I have not seen a trail of such results, but I imagine Luis writes sincerely. And I figure the strident nature of his remarks hails from his Apache lineage. I have appended below his entire attack on the gurus. I do not advocate or support that attack. I simply present it with the caveat that it expresses Luis’ opinion and people should think carefully before embracing the opinions expressed. Caveat emptor, as the saying goes.
Note that Larry Becraft comments only on the 1871 DC Constitution issue, not on everything else Luis wrote. On the off chance that he has not received ALL of Luis’ commentary, I’ll cc Larry for review and rebuttal.
If and when Luis creates a web site and posts his commentaries with proof sources, I’ll forward it to you. I like Larry’s site because for years it has constituted a reliable, stable souce of rebuttal to patriot myths.
Note that Radio man John Kotmair support’s Becraft’s view in opposition to Ewing’s view.
Also, some of the recipeints of this message might not subscribe to the Lawmen Newsletter. I encourage you to subscribe. Send email to lawmen+s...@googlegroups.com. See archive link below.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download Files FREE from the Lawmen Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with GetZooks!
Save Fuel
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Becraft
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 1:58 PM
To: john kotmair
Subject: Re: Fw: Let your LIGHT!!!!
I regret not fully reading the
below insane tripe and lies. I was completely turned off when I read most of
it. What I missed was this at the end:
ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE 1871 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION!!!!
Here we have just another of the many guru lies that float thru the freedom
movement.
Years ago, some girl wrote an article in some Net magazine asserting that some
undefined federal law enacted in 1871 completely changed the fed govt to a
corporation. Wild ideas were asserted regarding this unnamed act and the
gullible fell for it. Finally when this wild, insane idea reached a certain
level of acceptance in this movement, it caught my attention and I examined the
legal basis for this contention. I finally posted the below on my website to
address and refute this stupid idea.
I am completely disgusted at all the wild guru ideas that gain acceptance in
this movement. It makes the participants look like idiots.
Larry
This is on my website:
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/deadissues.htm
XX. The Federal Government is the 1871 act to establish a government for Washington D.C.:
For several years now, certain groups and websites like Worldnewsstand have advocated an argument that the "federal" government was created as a municipal corporation via an act of February 21, 1871. The truth is otherwise.
There is a history
regarding the formation of Washington, D.C. The Constitution specifically
provides for the formation of a district, 10 miles square, to be the seat of
the federal government; see Art. 1, § 8, cl. 17. When the Constitution
was ratified, the defacto seat of that government was in Philadelphia. The
Residence Act of 1790 (1
Stat. 130, July 16, 1790), started the process of establishing the District
of Columbia; in the interim, the government continued to meet in Philadelphia. On
December 19, 1791, Maryland adopted "An Act concerning the territory of
Columbia, and the City of Washington," which ceded lands and jurisdiction
for the Maryland part of the District. President Washington played a critical
role in the selection of the actual site of the District, as well as laying out
the plans for the city. Finally, on February 27, 1801, 2
Stat. 103, Congress adopted an act concerning the District, and
created two counties, Washington County on the Maryland side, and Alexandria
County on the Virginia side. See amendments, 2
Stat. 115, and 2
Stat. 193. On May 1, 1802, the then existing Board of Commissioners for the
District was abolished, replaced with a superintendent under the control of the
President; see 2
Stat. 175. On May 3, 1802, Congress adopted an act to incorporate the city
of Washington, in the District; see 2
Stat. 195, and amendments at 2
Stat. 254 and 422.
For some of the other acts regarding the District, see 3
Stat. 691, 4
Stat. 294, and 4
Stat. 517.
This was the form of government for the District until
February 21, 1871. On this date, Congress adopted a new act for the government
of the District; see 16
Stat. 419-429. As seen by a simple review of this act, it did not
create a government for anything but the District of Columbia, and it certainly
did not purport to be a government for "federal" citizens living in
the States. Also posted here are the first couple of pages from the 1873 Revised
Statutes for the District of Columbia.
Scandal was the reason that this form of government for
the District lasted only a mere 7 years. After the act of February 21, 1871,
public officials of the District incurred tremendous debts for the District,
eventually requiring Congress to in essence step in and take over that
government. See 18
Stat. (Part 3) 116, ch. 337, for repeal of 1871 act. An act of June 11,
1878, 20 Stat. 102, provided "a permanent form of government for the
District of Columbia." Much later, the District of Columbia Home Rule Act,
Public Law 93-198, 87 Stat. 777, approved December 24, 1973, created the
government for the District which exists today.
Those who assert some wild theory about Washington, D.C. are
utterly wrong. They have invented a "different version" of history
without bothering to check out the facts.
Larry Becraft wrote:
I think I have an idea where this garbage comes from. I was
recently provided the gist of this phony argument promoted by a
“popular” patriot guru and some of the allegations supporting this
argument are as follows:
There is NO Judicial Branch !
The Judicial Districts were ALL Abolished in 1856 by the Act of the 34th
Congress.
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1860 reviewed the Act of the 34th Congress ordered
ALL the States in Existence at that time to CLOSE DOWN all the Court's of law
and ALL Court's complied in every State in 1860.
NONE of the Court's in any State are Court's created by the Constitution of
their State.
It is typical of patriot gurus to completely invent “amazing” legal
arguments so they can take advantage of the gullible who do not know how to
research or look up legal authority. Of course, lawyers will easily detect
these lies, and this is why certain gurus advise their gullible followers to
not talk with lawyers: the reason is that lawyers would tell the gullible
followers that the guru is a liar and deceiver.
That which is quoted above in nothing but a horrible lie! For example, the
judicial districts were not abolished via some act of 1956, and the Supreme
Court did not order all courts closed in 1860. These contentions are guru lies
designed to deceive the gullible.
This is a BIG problem for the Freedom Movement. I have concluded you will find
more lies about legal matters in this movement than in the rest of American at
large. Too bad we have liars in large numbers in this movement. And the lies
hurt our good legal arguments. May these gurus burn in Hell forever.
Larry
John Kotmair wrote:
Harold:
This is bona fide poppycock.
John Kotmair
amigo-now wrote:
From this news letter there is information concerning the Constitution that I found rather interesting but don't know how true it is. Can you share any light on this?
----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Thornton
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 3:09 AM
Subject: Let your LIGHT!!!!
Dear Friends of Liberty.
----------
Rapture Ready: The Christians United for Israel Tour
Video 9:57
----------
Report on Strait Gate Vigil at Hagee's Night to Honor Israel, Phoenix
Part 1 http://tinyurl.com/yabj4gf video 8:23
Part 2 http://tinyurl.com/yc4kfyn Video 9:19
----------
Scroll down to the 10:43 video Zan One Man Demonstration
Dante said "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who remain neutral in times of moral crisis"
----------
Thanks Spiker for sharing this info.
Dr. Manning Speaks Truth To Power: Obama
====================
Lets take an advertising break.
Manning should be made aware of the following information
Joe Note: I am in contact with the gentleman that presents the following guarantees. If you would like to be on this gentleman’s mailing list, then give me permission to share your contact information with him.
. . . GUARANTEE . . . that by the time you get done reading this lengthy article, that . . . ALL OF YOU . . . will be . . . 100% . . . absolutely convinced that . . . ALL THE TAX GURUS . . . and . . . ALL THE ATTORNEYS . . . in the . . . TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT . . . are either . . . UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT AGENTS . . . or . . . IRS SNOOPS . . . or . . . COMPLETE IDIOTS WHO ARE . . . LEGALLY INCOMPETENT!!!!
further . . . GUARANTEE . . . that by the time you get done reading this, . . . ALL OF YOU . . . will be in . . . 100% AGREEMENT WITH ME THAT ALL OF THESE TAX GURUS AND ALL THE WELL KNOWN TAX ATTORNEYS THAT HANG AROUND THE PATRIOT COMMUNITY ALL NEED TO BE PUT OUT OF THE BUSINESS OF GIVING LEGAL ADVICE ON FEDERAL INCOME TAX MATTERS!!!!
Joe Note: The following segments are also included in his 50 page report. He will send this complete report to you if you request it, by allowing me to send him your contact info.
ALL
OF YOU ARE USING THE WRONG . . . STATE CONSTITUTIONS!!!!
THE ORIGINAL U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED!!!!
THE ORIGINAL U.S. CONSTITUTION IS CURRENTLY BEING HELD IN . . . CUSTODY . . .
OF . . . “THE NATIONAL MILITARY ARCHIVES” . . . AS HAS BEEN THEIR
EVER SINCE IT WAS FIRST CAPTURED WHEN MARTIAL LAW WAS DECLARED IN 1860.
THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS NEVER BEEN AMENDED TO GO PAST THE TWELFTH
AMENDMENT!!!!
THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION DOES NOT HAVE A 13th, 14th, 15th . . . OR . . .
SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT ON IT!!!!
THAT’S RIGHT, . . . THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION . . . THAT IS BEING HELD
. . . IN CUSTODY . . . BY . . . “THE NATIONAL MILITARY ARCHIVES” .
. . DOES NOT HAVE . . . “A SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT” . . . ON IT!!!!
ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE WRONG . . . U.S. U.S. CONSTITUTION!!!!
ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE 1871 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION!!!!
====================
It is No Secret
Music video 2:59
From Luis Ewing at <rcwcod...@comcast.net> or
<rcwcod...@yahoo.com> or
<rcwcod...@gmail.com> or
<rcwcod...@aol.com> or
<rcwcod...@hotmail.com>
or <lu...@luisewing.com> or
telephone: (253) 226-3741
(Note: Please copy and paste all 5 of my e-mail addresses listed above &
below and ADD them to your CONTACTS FOLDER.)
I have 5 different e-mail addresses under <rcwcodebuster @ the following 5
internet providers:
a.) comcast.net>
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) gmail.com>
d.) hotmail.com>
e.) aol.com>
New Web Sites: <www.luisewing.com>
or <www.ultimateusers.com>
TO MARCEL R. BENDSHADLER
AND TO:
JOSEPH O. SALADINO
AND TO:
MICHAEL S. MUNGOVAN aka “CAJUN MIKE.”
AND TO:
LINDSEY SPRINGER
AND TO:
OSCAR STILLEY
AND TO:
ROBERT KAHRE
AND TO:
PETE HENDRICKSON
DO YOU WANT TO GO TO PRISON OR DO YOU WANT TO WIN YOUR CASES????
I CAN BEAT ALL YOUR CRIMINAL CASES!!!!
Put your EGOS aside, you made your arguments, you did everything you knew how
to do and it didn’t work . . . AND
YOU LOST.
Now is NOT the time for you to start studying the tax code and try to put on a
defense, YOU ALREADY DID THAT . . . AND YOU
LOST!
FORGET WHAT YOU THINK YOU KNOW AND MAKE A
DECISION!!!!
AND FORGET WHAT YOU KNOW!!!!
ASK YOURSELVES THE FOLLOWING QUESTION:
“DO I WANT TO GO TO PRISON OR DO I
WANT TO WIN MY CASES????”
You guys have over 9,000 people to think about instead of just yourselves all
of whom are going to suffer SEVERE FINANCIAL PENALTIES because of YOU GUYS.
I cannot tell you how much or how little I would charge you to do your cases
until after I have reviewed your entire case file as my specialty is beating .
. . serious criminal charges!
At a minimum I know I could keep you from going to prison and no it’s not
the “counsel” issue!
Below is my CONSULTING FEE SCHEDULE.
Sincerely
Luis Ewing
PS – Also I will send you another e-mail showing you how to get your 4
CREDIT REPORTS.
* * * SNIP HERE * * *
SUBJECT: LUIS EWING
NON-REFUNDABLE CONSULTING FEES SCHEDULE FOR THOSE WHO WANT MORE INFORMATION,
BEFORE THEY SPEND ANY MONEY FOR MY NON-REFUNDABLE CONSULTING FEES TO REVIEW
YOUR IRS ISSUES!
(Note: I do NOT do anything on “contingency” and I do NOT do
“pro-bono” cases.) (If you are looking for FREE LEGAL HELP, please
contact your local office of the “PUBLIC DEFENDER” or the
ACLU.)(Rodney King had a VIDEO TAPE of the COPS BEATING HIM UP and he had to
WAIT 8 PLUS YEARS TO GET PAID, so NO, I am NOT even remotely
interested in in splitting the money in your so called MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR
LAWSUIT, as I cannot afford to WORK for FREE or WAIT 8 YEARS TO GET PAID.)
THE 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at <http://www.americanvision.com/bibles.aspx>
at TIMOTHY Chapter 5, verse 18 says:
“For the Scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that
treadeth out the corn: and, the laborer is worthy of his
wages.” Timothy, 5:18.
Hi to everyone, I sorry that I couldn’t
answer the phone, but my phone rings off the hook, and I get thousands of
e-mails per week on each of my e-mails and I click on the
“check-all” button and delete pages after pages at a time
“without” ever reading most of them, because I no longer have any
TIME to keep up with all of them.
ARE YOU IN TROUBLE WITH THE IRS????
DO NOT TRUST ANY ATTORNEY!!!!
IF YOU ARE COUNTING ON ANY ATTORNEY, I LUIS EWING LIKE MENS
WAREHOUSE WILL GUARANTEE IT, YOU WILL HAVE THE SAME CHANCE THAT THE LAST 95 OUT
OF THE LAST HUNDRED SIMILAR DEFENDANT’S HAD AND YOUR CHANCES ARE 95 %
THAT YOUR ATTORNEY WILL LOSE AND YOU WILL GO TO PRISON JUST LIKE THE LAST 95
OUT OF THE LAST 100 DEFENDANTS DID!!!!
That’s right . . . 95 . . . out of the last . . . 100
IRS defendant, all represented by . . . BAR CARD ATTORNEYS, . . . LOST . . .
and went straight to . . . PRISON!!!!
BELIEVE ME YOU ARE FAR FAR BETTER OFF GOING TO COURT PRO-SE
THAN GOING TO COURT WITH ANY BAR CARD CARRYING ATTORNEY!!!!
IF YOU DON’T WANT TO GO TO PRISON, YOU NEED TO FIRE
YOUR ATTORNEY NOW AND HIRE ME TO HELP YOU BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!!!
AT A MINIMUM, I COULD KEEP YOU FROM GOING TO PRISON . . .
EVEN IF YOU ARE FOUND . . . GUILTY!!!!
BUT THIS SPECIFIC METHOD CANNOT WORK IF THE COURT RECORD
SHOWS THAT YOU ARE . . . “REPRESENTED”
. . . by an . . . ATTORNEY!!!!
HOWEVER, I HAVE SEVERAL
OTHER METHODS FOR BEATING A IRS CRIMINAL CASE EVEN AFTER CONVICTION ND I CAN
KEEP YOU FROM GOING TO PRISON EVEN IF YOU ARE OR WERE FOUND GUILTY WITH AN
ATTORNEY!!!!
BUT I WILL NOT DISCUSS WHAT THOSE METHODS ARE UNTIL AFTER
YOU HAVE AT LEAST PAID MY MINIMUM CONSULTING FEES TO REVIEW YOUR CASE FIRST!!!!
I am NOT a WSBA ATTORNEY!
I am NOT a “legal provider” as defined by subsection (1)(a) of RCW
2.48.180.
I am NOT a “non-lawyer”as defined by subsection (1)(b) of RCW
2.48.180.
I am NOT a member of the criminally corrupt “Washington State Bar
Association”!
I am a “TRIBAL COURT LAWYER” and I will NOT
“represent”you in a STATE COURT at this time period.
I only work for PRO-SE LITIGANTS who are defending themselves in person without
an attorney in the capacity of “OF COUNSEL” and as a
“para-legal.”
My authority to practice law and/or give legal advice and/or prepare and sell
legal documents is granted automatically WITHOUT ADMISSION pursuant to RCW
2.48.190, RCW 2.48.170, Subsection (7) of RCW 2.48.180, Washington State Court
Rule APR 1.1 and the current Session Law at Sections’ 3275 & 3276 of
THE TERRITORIAL CODE OF 1881 which has been UNCHANGED since 1881 pursuant to Parosa
v. Tacoma which reads in part:
“But the legislature specifically
disclaimed any intention to change the meaning of any statute. The
compilers of the code were not empowered by congress to amend existing law, and
doubtless had no thought of doing so ...” ...the act before
us does not purport to amend a section of an act, but only a section of a
compilation entitled “REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON,” WHICH IS NOT THE
LAW. Such an act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie
compilation leaves the law unchanged. En Banc.” PAROSA v. TACOMA,
57 Wn.(2d) 409 (Dec.22, 1960).
I do not give free legal advice!
I do NOT give blind estimates or price quotes for any kind of a case without
have first read your entire case file period!
I cannot give you an estimate or a price quote on how much or how little
that I would charge you or anybody else to do any kind of case, until
AFTER I have read all letters or correspondences sent to your employer by the
IRS and/or all letters or correspondence sent by the IRS to your bank and/or
all liens, levies or notice of federal tax liens filed in either the county
recorders office or with the State and/or all summons, complaints,
information’s or complaint’s written by the U.S. Attorney or DOJ,
all grand jury indictments, superceding indictments, and all letters or
correspondence between you and the IRS and then I still have to make special
trip to the law library to look up the most recent applicable and
“on-point” case law interpreting all the statutes or court rules or
published case law that is cited or quoted in all your paperworks that is
similar to your situation, therefore, it is an absolute waste of your
time and my time to TALK about anything to do with your case until AFTER I have
read your entire case file and you must pay my consulting fees in advance if
you want me to do that!!!!
TO ALL IRS DEFENDANTS, I NEED YOU TO SEND ME THE FOLLOWING BELOW LISTED
DOCUMENTS, so that I can check, cross-check and double check for proper
service of the correct paperwork and filing of the proper paperwork within the
time limits or statutes of limitation that are applicable under both State and
Federal law.
The following 8 items are absolutely necessary if you want me to be able to
remove your liens:
1.) A COPY OF ALL PAPERWORK THAT WAS SENT TO YOUR EMPLOYER FROM THE IRS
and/or all and any responses sent by your employer back to the IRS.
2.) A copy of all paperwork sent by YOU to your EMPLOYER and all of their
responses.
3.) A copy of all paperwork sent by YOU to the IRS and all of their
responses.
4.) A CERTIFIED COPY of all NOTICE OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN filings in the . . .
COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE.
5.) A CERTIFIED COPY of your most recent CREDIT REPORT from . . . ALL 4 CREDIT
REPORTING BUREAU'S.
6.) A CERTIFIED COPY of all LIENS filed in the STATE at the UCC FILING DIVISION
of the OFFICE of THE SECRETARY OF STATE in Olympia, Washington,
where you will go in person and fill out a UCC-3 or UCC-11 FORM and pay for a
STATEWIDE CHECK for ALL NOTICE OF LEVY'S, NOTICE OF LIENS or NOTICES OF FEDERAL
TAX LIENS that are FILED against you in your STATE.
7.) A copy of all paperwork that was sent to your bank.
8.) A copy of all paperwork that was sent to your Escrow Company.
NOTE: IT IS 100% ABSOLUTELY IMPERATIVE THAT I AT LEAST HAVE CERTIFIED
COPIES OF ALL LIENS FILED IN THE COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE AND A NEW CERTIFIED
COPY OF YOUR LATEST CREDIT REPORT FROM ALL 4 CREDIT REPORTING AGENCIES OR YOU
TAKE THE RISK OF ME NOT BEING ABLE TO GIVE YOU A PROPER CONSULTING AND YOU TAKE
THE RISK OF NOT BEING ABLE TO REMOVE YOUR LIENS IF I DO NOT HAVE ALL PROOFS OR
EVIDENCES OF IMPROPER FILING OR NO FILING AT ALL!!!!
My base consulting fee to review your file of NO MORE THAN 1 INCH OF PAPERWORK
is . . . $1,300.00.
After that it is . . . $1,000.00 PER REAM or 500 PAGES.
If you have really large files, discounts are available after 3 or 4 or 5
reams.
$1,300.00 only pays me to review . . . 1 STATUTE VIOLATION . . . for . .
. 1 COUNT . . . only.
After that it is . . . $1,000.00 per statute and an additional $1,000.00 per
count or year, even if it is the very same statute.
Discounts are available after 5 counts or 5 statutes, so please send me an
e-mail telling me the value of taxes in dispute $_____.00 and the value of all
liens, levies or notice of federal tax liens that have been filed $______.00
and please tell me specifically which statutes you have been charged with
violating and how many counts of each so that I could give you an appropriate
discount.
The affirmative defenses for not filing or not paying over a tax are different,
so no, it’s not all the same thing just because you have been charged
with multiple counts of the same statute.
Some people think that they want to save money and only pay me the $1,300.00
base fee, but you will be taking the chance of me NOT being able to give
you a proper consulting if I can't review all correspondences paperwork with
both the IRS and your employer????
I absolutely need you to provide me copies of . . . ALL YOUR CORRESPONDENCE
WITH BOTH THE IRS, YOUR EMPLOYER and/or YOUR BANK if any money has been taken
out or if your accounts have been freezed.
It is very very important that I review ALL of your paperwork, because I
might be able to tell you where you screwed up or I might be able to fix or
complete or fill in the gaps in a small mistake or minor error that someone
else made in your paperwork, i.e., some of your paperwork might be
pretty good and almost got you there, but was missing 1 or 2 or more
things to make it work, but I won't know that until I read your entire
case file of all your paperwork and all your correspondence with the IRS.
So send me an e-mail telling me which fee you are going to pay, $1,300.00
or $_____.00 so that I can type out a RECEIPT before you get here.
Please do NOT send or bring me originals as I do NOT want to be responsible for
losing any of your original paperwork and I want to be able to throw your file
in the recycle can if you decide not to hire me to do anything about your IRS
problems after I have reviewed your case.
Sincerely
Luis Ewing
AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . .
“WITHOUT ADMISSION” . . . by the WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME
COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 38.38.256, 5 U.S.C. 500 (b), RCW
26.25.010, RCW 26.21.005 (19)(a), RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a), RCW
26.26.011 (19), RCW 26.27.021 (16), RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154,
18 U.S.C 1161, 18 U.S.C. 2265, 25 U.S.C. 1301, 25 U.S.C. 1903 (4),
25 U.S.C. 1903 (8), 25 U.S.C. 1911 (a)(b)(c), 25 U.S.C. 1901 -1963 (“ICWA”),
25 U.S.C. 3631, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 44 Fed. Reg. 67584 to 67595 (1979),
RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), GR 24 (b)(8),
Sections 3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881. See also CR 82.5
(a) & RCW 13.34.240.
Contact Tribal Court Lawyer Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or <rcwcod...@comcast.net> or
<rcwcod...@yahoo.com> or
<rcwcod...@gmail.com> or
<rcwcod...@hotmail.com>
or <rcwcod...@aol.com>
1 HAVE FIVE (5) E-MAIL ADDRESS at <rcwcodebuster @ the following 5 internet
provider addresses to wit:
a.) comcast.net>
b.) gmail.com>
c.) yahoo.com>
d.) hotmail.com>
e.) aol.com>
PLEASE DON’T FORGET TO COPY & PASTE ALL 5 OF MY E-MAIL ADDRESSES INTO
YOUR CONTACTS FOLDER IF YOU DON’T WANT MY E-MAILS TO GET ROUTED STRAIGHT
TO YOUR SPAM FOLDER BY YOUR INTERNET PROVIDER:
rcwcod...@comcast.net, rcwcod...@gmail.com, rcwcod...@yahoo.com, rcwcod...@hotmail.com, rcwcod...@aol.com, lu...@luisewing.com
CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This E-Mail is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C. 2521; RCW
9.73.030 (1)(a)(b); RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.52.130 and RCW
9.73.020 and is legally privileged and you do NOT have my “consent”
for forward this e-mail to anyone. The information contained in this E-Mail is
intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or
agent responsible to deliver it to the Sendee, please destroy the E-Mail after
advising by reply that you erroneously received this E-Mail. The receipt by
anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive the lawyer or
“of-counsel client privilege,” nor will it constitute a
waiver of the “work-product doctrine.” Any information obtained
in violation of RCW 9.73.030; RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.52.130
and RCW 9.73.020 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW 9.73.050 and further,
anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else without my express prior
“written consent” is liable for civil monetary damages under Washington
law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and criminal penalties under RCW 9.73.080.
The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential
and may be hazardous to your preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed free
“only” to those specific recipients listed above who have
previously expressed an interest in receiving the information for research and
educational purposes and have made a prior request for said information.
If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is
hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b)(c);
RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This message is being
sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial
e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed
by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be
considered SPAM as long as it includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to
be removed from future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has reached you
in error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the mailing list,
please return to the below listed address asking me to remove you to Luis Ewing
2110 150th Street East, Tacoma, Wash. 98445 or call and leave a message
with your E-Mail address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank
you!
--
Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741
Email1: rcwcod...@comcast.net
or
Email2: rcwcod...@yahoo.com or
Email3: rcwcod...@gmail.com or
Email4: rcwcod...@hotmail.com
Email5: rcwcod...@aol.com
Mon 11/23/2009 9:23 PM
I have beat the best drug attorney in the State of Washington Jeffrey
Steinborn who WAS the best drug attorney in the State of Washington until I
beat the case he said he could not beat in Snohomish County Superior Court and
I also beat PERKINS COIE TOP FORECLOSURE EXPERT Joseph Bringman who is rated in
the top 100 attorneys in the U.S. and his law firm PERKINS COIE is rated in the
top 100 law firms in the U.S., I beat him and the entire PERKINS COIE
FORECLOSURE DIVISION in a FORECLOSURE case where I kept a "paying
client" in his house 18 months RENT FREE AFTER THEY SOLD HIS HOUSE AT THE
SHERIFF'S SALE AT THE FRONT OF THE KING COUNTY COURT HOUSE.
On my worst day and stoned out of my mind, I can brief circles around
amateurs like Larry Becraft, Tommy Cryer, Jeffrey Dickstein or
Oscar Stilley and I have seen all their work and their briefings are piss poor
and in my opinion, I could have paid any paralegal $500.00 to no more
than $1,200.00 and got better briefings out of any para-legal for what they
gave to their clients, those guys are leeches just sucking their clients
dry for very little work.
You are correct that a lot of people don't like my attitude, but they can
fuck off as far as I am concerned and I guarantee you that sooner or later all
of them will all come to me with their tails tucked between their legs because
I am the only guy who has any kind of consistent track record of winning and so
far everyone that I said was BS has gone to jail sooner or later and I was
proved to be correct, everybody's just pissed off that I put down their
favorite likeable guru, however, I have never been once proven to
be wrong, so far I have been right every single time, I have never been
wrong yet.
I know how to beat the IRS, I am just waiting for the right client or a
large enough group of patriots of at least 200 to 300 or more, I will
just wait a few more years until all the rest of the tax gurus go to prison or
get put out of business until people wake up and get their heads out of their
asses and realize, oh shit, Luis is still winning his cases and he
adverises he files no returns and pays no taxes since 1989 and the IRS still
has not even tried to audit me, summon me or indict me because they
already know I would beat them in court, not to mention that I have
already beat them in at least 2 major income tax cases that you don't know
about and caused 1 major tax trial to be indefinately postphone in 1 State and
cause another couple not to be indicted in Oregon.
I am out of the system, I have no minimal contacts and conduct "no
business" IN THIS STATE or WITHIN THIS STATE as I am engaged in FREE
ENTERPRISE in the REAL PRIVATE SECTOR with NO BUSINESS LICENSES.
SOONER OR LATER ALL THE PATRIOTS AND ALL THE
TAX HONESTY COMMUNITY WILL ALL COME TO ME AND I WILL TAKE OVER THE ENTIRE
PATRIOT MOVEMENT AND TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT SIMPLY BECAUSE I AM THE ONLY 1 WHO
CAN PROVES THAT HE WINS SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASES WHEREAS ALL THE TAX GURUS I HAVE
NAMED HAVE NEVER WON ANYTHING OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE.
The ONLY people I will alienate are THE STUPID PEOPLE and the WANT SOMETHING
FOR NOTHING CHEAPSKATES.
I am making good money helping DRUNK DRIVERS and DRUG DEALERS, so for
now, I can bide my time and just "wait" until next year or 2012
or 2015 to start teaching SEMINARS how to beat the IRS and force them to
recognize your legal status as a NON-TAX PAYER.
I already know how to beat the IRS hands down, but I am NOT going to
teach it until the "numbers" are right period.
I am NOT going to allow another incident like what happened in Ohio where
Michael Young was the 1 and only person who attended my seminar.
From Luis Ewing at <rcwcodebuster (at) comcast.net> or <rcwcodebuster
(at) yahoo.com> or <rcwcodebuster (at) gmail.com> or <rcwcodebuster
(at) aol.com> or <rcwcodebuster (at) hotmail.com> or <luis (at) luisewing.com> or telephone: (253) 226-3741
(Note: Please copy and paste all 5 of my e-mail addresses listed above & below and ADD them to your CONTACTS FOLDER.)
I have 5 different e-mail addresses under <rcwcodebuster @ the following 5 internet providers:
a.) comcast.net>
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) gmail.com>
d.) aol.com>
e.) hotmail.com>
New Web Sites: <www.luisewing.com> or <www.ultimateusers.com>
SUBJECT: ARE YOU DRIVING WHILE BLACK OR DRIVING WHILE POOR? – YOU
CAN BEAT YOUR OWN CASES WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY AND I CAN SHOW YOU HOW!!!!
I am NOT a scumbag WSBA ATTORNEY!
I NEVER attended any . . . JESUIT OWNED . . . LAW SCHOOL!!!!
I am NOT a member in good standing of the criminally corrupt Washington State Bar Association “or” any other criminally corrupt State Bar Association!
I specialize in “serious criminal matters” and help people who fight their own cases (Pro-se) “without” an attorney and can help you beat all of the following charges:
1.) Manufacturing Marijuana with Intent to Deliver.
2.) Marijuana Possession.
3.) Possession with Intent to Deliver Controlled Substances.
(Cocaine, Meth Amphetamines, Crack, Marijuana, etc.)
4.) Drug trafficking. (Cocaine, Meth Amphetamines, Crack, Marijuana,
etc.)
5.) Are you a landlord whose renter got busted for growing marijuana and need help to stop the cops from trying to steal your house with DRUG FORFEITURE LAWS????
6.) Driving While License Suspended.
7.) Driving Without a License.
8.) Driving Under the Influence.
9.) Driving While Intoxicated.
10.) Reckless Driving.
11.) Negligent Driving.
12.) Resisting Arrest.
13.) Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer.
14.) Refusal to Cooperate and Give Information.
15.) 3rd & 4th Degree Assault of a Police Officer.
16.) 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th Degree Assault.
17.) Domestic Violence. – Are you being harassed with ANTI- HARASSMENT ORDERS or TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS????
18.) Malicious Mischief
19.) Criminal Contempt of Court.
20.) Civil Contempt of Court.
21.) IRS – Willful Failure to File Income Tax Return.
22.) IRS – Income Tax Evasion.
23.) IRS – Removing NOFTL’s.
24.) Child Support – NEVER PAY IT AGAIN!
25.) Child Custody
26.) Want to sue the CPS Division of DSHS????
27.) STOP ALL COLLECTION AGENCIES and ALL CREDITORS dead in their tracks.
28.) STOP or DELAY FORECLOSURES!
29.) Federal Security Violations. (SEC).
30.) Washington State Department of Financial Institutions Violations. (State version of SEC).
31.) Washington State Employment Security Violations.
32.) Washington State Department of Labor Violations.
33.) Are you an INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR who is being harassed by STATE & FEDERAL AGENCIES regarding whether your own children or the people who are working for you are in fact and law “employees” or “independent contractors”???? – If so, you need my help!!!!
34.) BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS!
35.) Beat all NO INSURANCE TICKETS for FREE, ask me how????
36.) Beat all NO SEAT BELT TICKETS for FREE, ask me how????
37.) DO YOU WANT OUT OF THE SYSTEM?
38.) I can help set you up with ASSET PROTECTION such as Trust’s, LLC’s and Non-Profit Religious Corporation Soles.
39.) WANT TO OPEN UP BANK ACCOUNTS WITH NO SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER?
40.) WANT TO GET A CELLULAR PHONE WITHOUT HAVING TO PROVIDE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER?
41.) CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS THREATENING TO COME ONTO YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT A WARRANT?????
42.) LANDLORD THREATENING TO EVICT YOU????
43.) Is the government or the thieving cops trying to use DRUG FORFEITURE LAWS TO SEIZE YOUR PROPERTY or CARS????
44.) Illegal Guns or illegal weapons charges.
I have beat all these charges either for myself or for many clients and many other charges as well, and you can too with my help!!!!
However, I do NOT GUARANTEE RESULTS PERIOD!!!!
Whether you . . . WIN . . . or . . . LOSE, . . . you contribute to 1 really really GOOD CAUSE and that is . . . PUTTING A BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY . . . OUT OF WORK!!!!
THE 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at <http://www.americanvision.com/bibles.aspx>
at TIMOTHY Chapter 5, verse 18 says:
“For the Scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn: and, the laborer is worthy of his wages.” Timothy, 5:18.
The 1 and ONLY . . . SALES PITCH . . . that I ever give anyone is that dollar for dollar and page for page, you will get far better legal research and brief writing out of me than you could ever hope to get out of any private attorney or law firm.
If you are sick and tired of attorneys charging a lot of money to do absolutely nothing other than ask you to PLEA BARGAIN which means PLEAD GUILTY and PAY THE FINES then send me an E-MAIL asking me to send you my FREE FLYERS and my CONSULTING FEES schedule.
For serious inquiries only!!!!
Sincerely
Luis Ewing
AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . . “WITHOUT ADMISSION” . . . by the WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 26.25.010, RCW
26.21.005 (19)(a) and RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a), RCW 26.26.011 (19), RCW
26.27.021 (16), RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154, 18 U.S.C 1161, 18 U.S.C. 2265, 25 U.S.C. 1301, 25 U.S.C. 1903 (4), 25 U.S.C. 1903 (8),
25 U.S.C. 1911 (a)(b)(c), 25 U.S.C. 1901 -1963 (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C.
3631, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 44 Fed. Reg. 67584 to 67595 (1979), RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), GR 24 (b)(8), Sections
3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881. See also CR 82.5 (a) & RCW 13.34.240.
Contact Tribal Court Lawyer Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or <rcwcod...@comcast.net> or <rcwcod...@yahoo.com> or <rcwcod...@gmail.com> or <rcwcod...@hotmail.com>
1 HAVE FIVE (5) E-MAIL ADDRESS at <rcwcodebuster @ the following 5 internet provider addresses to wit:
a.) comcast.net>
b.) gmail.com>
c.) yahoo.com>
d.) hotmail.com>
e.) aol.com>
PLEASE DON’T FORGET TO COPY & PASTE ALL 5 OF MY E-MAIL ADDRESSES INTO YOUR CONTACTS FOLDER IF YOU DON’T WANT MY E-MAILS TO GET ROUTED STRAIGHT TO YOUR SPAM FOLDER BY YOUR INTERNET PROVIDER:
rcwcod...@comcast.net, rcwcod...@gmail.com, rcwcod...@yahoo.com, rcwcod...@hotmail.com, rcwcod...@aol.com, lu...@luisewing.com
CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This E-Mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C.
2521; RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b); RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.
52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 and is legally privileged and you do NOT have my “consent” for forward this e-mail to anyone. The information contained in this E-Mail is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or agent responsible to deliver it to the Sendee, please destroy the E-Mail after advising by reply that you erroneously received this E-Mail. The receipt by anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive the lawyer or “of-counsel client privilege,” nor will it constitute a waiver of the “work- product doctrine.” Any information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030; RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW 9.73.050 and further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else without my express prior “written consent” is liable for civil monetary damages under Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and criminal penalties under RCW 9.73.080. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential and may be hazardous to your preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed free “only” to those specific recipients listed above who have previously expressed an interest in receiving the information for research and educational purposes and have made a prior request for said information. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b)
(c); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This message is
being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill
s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL
INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be considered SPAM as long as it
includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to be removed from future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has reached you in error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the mailing list, PLEASE SEND ME AN E-MAIL REQUESTING THAT I REMOVE YOU FROM MY E- MAIL LIST AND I WILL REMOVE YOU WITHIN 72 HOURS FROM MY RECEIPT OF YOUR E-MAIL although it may take me 4 to 5 days to catch up to your e- mail because I get so many e-mail request’s for my FREE FLYERS from all over the U.S. or please return to the below listed address asking me to remove you to Luis Ewing, 1910 147th Street Ct. East, Tacoma, Wash. 98445-3499 or call and leave a message with your E-Mail address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank you!
From
Luis Ewing at <rcwcodebuster (at) comcast.net> or <rcwcodebuster (at) yahoo.com> or <rcwcodebuster
(at) gmail.com> or
<rcwcodebuster (at) aol.com>
or <rcwcodebuster (at) hotmail.com>
or <luis (at) luisewing.com>
or telephone: (253) 226-3741
(Note: Please copy and paste all 5 of my e-mail addresses listed above &
below and ADD them to your CONTACTS FOLDER.)
I have 5 different e-mail addresses under <rcwcodebuster @ the following 5
internet providers:
a.) comcast.net>
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) gmail.com>
d.) hotmail.com>
e.) aol.com>
New Web Sites: <www.luisewing.com>
or <www.ultimateusers.com>
GODS LAW as written in the 1599 GENEVA
BIBLE at <http://www.americanvision.com/bibles.aspx>
says:
“And putting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which
was contrary to us, he even took it out of the way, and fastened it upon the
cross, . . .” Colossians 2: 14.
“That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with
every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with crafttiness,
whereby they lay in wait to deceive.” Ephesians, 4:14
“And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it
lawfully.” Timothy, 1:8
“Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am
not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them.” Mathews 5:17.
SUBJECT: THE 14 EASIEST
AND BEST WAYS TO SPOT OR DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE IS AN . . .
UNDERCOVER IRS SNOOP . . . and/or . . . . HOW TO TELL IF THE TAX GURU YOU ARE
DEALING WITH IS REALLY JUST IGNORANT OF THE LAW AND LEGALLY INCOMPETENT????
I Luis Ewing . . . GUARANTEE . . . that by the time you get done reading
this lengthy article, that . . . ALL OF YOU . . . will be . . . 100% . . .
absolutely convinced that . . . ALL THE TAX GURUS . . . and . . . ALL THE
ATTORNEYS . . . in the . . . TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT . . . are either . . .
UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT AGENTS . . . or . . . IRS SNOOPS . . . or . . .
COMPLETE IDIOTS WHO ARE . . . LEGALLY INCOMPETENT!!!!
I Luis Ewing further . . . GUARANTEE . . . that by the time you get done
reading this, . . . ALL OF YOU . . . will be in . . . 100% AGREEMENT WITH
ME THAT ALL OF THESE TAX GURUS AND ALL THE WELL KNOWN TAX ATTORNEYS THAT HANG
AROUND THE PATRIOT COMMUNITY ALL NEED TO BE PUT OUT OF THE BUSINESS OF GIVING
LEGAL ADVICE ON FEDERAL INCOME TAX MATTERS!!!!
For many years now I have suspected ALL the BIG KNOW IT ALL TAX GURUS of being
. . . UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT AGENTS . . . or . . . IRS SNOOPS . .
. working for either or both . . . The DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE . .
. or the . . . IRS . . . or that . . . ALL OF THEM WERE COMPLETE IDIOTS,
STUPID MORONS AND LEGAL LUNATICS WHO WOULD NOT KNOW THE LAW IF I HIT THEM IN
THE HEAD WITH A LAW BOOK!!!!
So I have just sat in the background and . . . WATCHED ALL . . . of them for
many years now and have discovered that . . . ALL . . . of them are clearly . .
. MISSTATING THE LAW!!!!
I KNOW THAT ALL OF YOU OUT THERE IN THE SO CALLED . . . “TAX
HONESTY MOVEMENT” . . . HAVE HEARD ALL THE BIG KNOW IT ALL TAX
GURUS LIKE . . . BOB SCHULTZ . . . OF . . . “WE THE
PEOPLE” . . . and . . . “THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS” . .
. CHUCK CONCES . . . FOUNDER OF . . . “THE LAWMAN GROUPS” . .
. PEYMON MOTTADAH . . . OWNER OF . . . “THE FREEDOM LAW
SCHOOL” . . . STEPHEN HEMPLING . . . OF THE . . . “FREE
ENTERPRISE SOCIETY” . . . “SAVE A PATRIOT FELLOWSHIP” . . .
EDDIE “CON-MAN” KAHN . . . AND HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS . . .
“AMERICAN RIGHTS LITIGATORS” . . . LINDSEY SPRINGER . . . EDWIN
RIVERA . . . CHRISTOPHER HANSEN . . . RALPH WINTERROWD . . . L.B. BORK . . .
“IRS CODEBUSTERS” . . . PQI & GLOBAL PROSPERITY . . . 1099 OID
REFUND SCAMMERS . . . RANDALL WHITE . . . AND . . . PETE HENDRICKSON . . . GO
INTO EXTREME DETAIL OVER AND OVER AGAIN ABOUT THE DEFINITION OF . . .
“INCLUDES” . . . AND . . . “INCLUDING” . . . AS
PROVIDED BY . . . “26 U.S.C. 7701" . . . AT SUBSECTION (9)
DEFINING . . . “UNITED STATES” . . . AND SUBSECTION (10)
DEFINING . . . “STATE.”
“For such false apostles are deceitful workers, and transform themselves
into the Apostles of Christ.” 2 Corinthians 11:13
“And he said unto them, I saw Satan, like lightening, fall down from
heaven.” Luke 10:18
“And no marvel: for Satan himself is transformed into an Angel of
light.” 2 Corinthians 11:14
“Therefore it is no great thing, though his ministers transform
themselves, as though they were the ministers of righteousness, whose end shall
be according to their works.” 2 Corinthians 11:15
Did you notice how they MISQUOTE or MISSTATE out of context the true meaning of
what . . . INCLUDE . . . at . . . 26 U.S.C. 7701 (c) . . . means as
allegedly stated by Brigham v. United States, 160 F.3d 759 (1st Cir. 1998) as
applied to . . . “26 U.S.C. 3401"????
WHY DON’T THEY JUST EXPLAIN WHAT EVERY WORD OR PHRASE IN . . . 26 U.S.C.
3401 . . . MEANS????
Did you notice how they keep you busy looking at what they want you to look at
as they try and do impress you with their so called knowledge of the cannons of
law using esoteric legal terms such as . . . “Noscitur a sociis” .
. . and . . . “ejusdem generis”????
We did NOT need to look at the case law defining . . . “Noscitur a
sociis” . . . and . . . “ejusdem generis.” (Emphasis
added).
WE DO NOT NEED TO GO FURTHER THAN . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)!!!!
Did you notice how ALL THESE BIG TAX GURUS go to such extreme effort to keep
you distracted and impress you with their so called knowledge of the law and
then make such obvious misquotes and misstatements of the law by then stating
that allegedly the 1st Circuit’s interpretation of . . . 7701 (c) . . .
somehow magically follows from the cannon noscitur a sociis, “a word is
known by the company it keeps”, as found in very old and well settled
Supreme Court case law, which the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld citing
Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co., 367 U.S. 303, 307 (1961) and Gustafson v
Alloyd Co. (93404), 513 U.S. 561 (1995); Circuit City Stores v. Adams, 532 U.S.
105, 114-115 (2001); Morales v. TWA, 504 U.S. 374 (1992).????
Why did . . . PETE HENDRICKSON . . . and . . . RANDALL WHITE . . . just .
. . “GLOSS OVER” . . . “26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)” . . . SO
QUICKLY????
What does those “noscitur a sociis cases” and “ejusdem
generis cases” or . . . YICK WO HOPKINS . . . have to do with whether or
NOT . . . YOU REALLY QUALIFY AS AN . . . “EMPLOYEE” . . .
UNDER . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401 (c) . . . and . . . 26 U.S.C. 3121 (a)????
Did you also notice how ALL THESE BIG KNOW IT ALL TAX GURUS go to such
extra-ordinary lengths to keep you distracted and busy reading their . . .
“MEMORANDUMS OF LAW” . . . trying to impress you with all their
extensive legal research into showing you that the U.S. Supreme Court also
reminds us to refrain from reading anything into a statute when Congress has left
it out citing Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23, 78 L.Ed.2d 17, 104
S.Ct. 296 (1983) (Quoting United States v. Wong Kim Bo, 472 F.2d 720, 722 (CA
1972)????
Did you also notice how ALL THESE BIG TAX GURUS work so hard to keep you busy
and distracted not looking at the relevant statutes in question, looking in
other directions, by showing you other statutes that do not define what
or who qualifies as an employer and employer such as . . . “28 U.S.C
3003" . . . or . . . “11 U.S.C. 102" . . . or . . .
“27 CFR 72.11" . . . all 3 of which more specifically defines
the terms . . . “includes” . . . and . . .
“including”????
“26 U.S.C. 7701" . . . ALREADY HAS IT’S OWN DEFINITION OF . .
. “INCLUDES” . . .!!!!
WE DID NOT NEED TO SEE . . . 28 U.S.C. 3003 . . . or . . . 11 U.S.C. 102 . .
. or . . . 27 CFR 72.11 . . .!!!!
WE DO NOT NEED TO GO FURTHER THAN . . . “26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)” . . .
or . . . “26 U.S.C. 3121 (a)(e)(2)” . . . TO FIGURE OUT THAT A
STATE LICENSED CORPORATION LIKE MCDONALDS, TACO BELL, BASKIN ROBBINS,
AL’S AUTO SUPPLY, SCHUCKS AUTO SUPPLY, J.C. PENNEY’S, SEARS,
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, 7-11, ALBERTSONS, SAFEWAY, QFC, BON MACEYS AND
STARBUCKS COFFEES ARE ALL . . . “POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS” . .
. AND . . . “INSTRUMENTALITIES” . . . OF THE FEDERAL DISTRICT
STATES SUCH AS . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA . . . or . . . STATE OF TEXAS .
. . or . . . STATE OF ALABAMA . . . and conjunctively . . . THE DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA!!!!
ANY DUMMY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN ALREADY THAT EVERY BUSINESS THAT WAS OR IS ISSUED A
MASTERS BUSINESS LICENSE FROM ANY OF THE 50 CORPORATE STATES IS IN FACT AND LAW
. . . “A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE” . . . AND AN . .
. “INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE” . . . DUH!!!!
WHY DID ALL THESE BIG TAX GURUS HAVE TO SHOW US ALL THIS OTHER LEGAL CRAP
FOR????
WHY HAVEN’T THEY GONE OVER WHAT EVERY WORD OR PHRASE OR CLAUSE IN THE
STATUTE . . . “26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)” . . . REALLY MEANS????
WHY HAVE ALL THE TAX GURUS JUST GLOSSED OVER . . . “26 U.S.C 3401
(c)” . . . SO QUICKLY????
I ALSO KNOW THAT ALL OF YOU OUT THERE IN THE SO CALLED . . . TAX HONESTY
MOVEMENT . . . HAVE ALSO SEEN ALL THESE BIG KNOW IT ALL TAX GURUS GO INTO
EXTREME DETAIL ABOUT WHAT THE DEFINITION OF THE TERM . . .
“EMPLOYEE” . . . OR . . . “EMPLOYMENT” . . . AS PROVIDED
BY . . . “26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)” . . . AND . . . “26
U.S.C. 3121 (e)(2) . . . AND . . . “CFR 404.104" . . . AS PUBLISHED
IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER, ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1943, AT PAGE 12267!!!!
WOW, THESE GUYS HAVE LOT’S AND LOT’S OF HOMEWORK!!!!
“A MEMORANDUM OF LAW” . . . DEFINING . . . “INCLUDES” .
. . AND . . . “INCLUDING”!!!!
I’M IMPRESSED, HA, HA, HA!!!!
ALL OF THESE BIG TAX GURUS HAVE TO BE . . . “UNDER COVER
AGENTS”!!!!
OR ALL OF THESE BIG TAX GURUS ARE . . . “REALLY STUPID”????
THERE IS . . . “NO WAY IN HELL” . . . THAT ALL THESE BIG KNOW IT
ALL TAX GURUS DID ALL THIS STUDY AND RESEARCH INTO THESE CODE SECTIONS AND
STATUTES AND CASE LAW . . . AND MAKE THIS MANY MISTAKES AND GET IT ALL WRONG .
. .UNLESS THEY ALL DID IT ON PURPOSE!!!!
YOU KNOW I KNOW THAT THERE IS . . . “ONE THING” . .
THAT ALL THESE TAX GURUS . . . WERE COUNTING ON????
QUESTION: WHAT’S THAT YOU ASK????
ANSWER: THEY WERE ALL HOPING THAT NOBODY IN THE TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT OR PATRIOT
MOVEMENT WOULD STOP BEING TOO LAZY TO DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH OF THE LAW . .
.BECAUSE IF SOME PATRIOT WERE TO ACTUALLY PICK UP A LAW BOOK AND READ IT, THAT
PATRIOT WOULD DISCOVER FOR THE FIRST TIME THAT LITERALLY EVERY CASE CITE
QUOTATION IN . . . “TITLE 26 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 3401 UNITED
STATES CODE SERVICE LAWYERS EDITION” . . . VERY CLEARLY SHOWS THAT EVERY
. . . “26 U.S.C. 3401 CASE” . . . REGARDING . . .
“EMPLOYERS” . . . AND . . . “EMPLOYEES” . . . INVOLVES
A PRIVATE CORPORATION THAT IS LICENSED TO DO BUSINESS . . . IN THE . . .
DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA . . . DISTRICT STATE OF TEXAS . . . AND THE
. . . DISTRICT STATE OF ALABAMA!!!!
IT DOESN’T NOT MATTER IF I DON’T HAVE EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT ALL
THESE TAX GURUS ARE IN FACT . . . UNDER COVER GOVERNMENT AGENTS . . . OR
. . . IRS SNOOPS!!!!!
QUESTION: WHY YOU ASK????
ANSWER: BECAUSE I PROVED THEM TO BE BOTH . . . IGNORANT OF THE LAW . . .
AND . . . GROSSLY INCOMPETENT!!!!
AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING WILL PROVE THAT AT THE VERY LEAST, THAT ALL THESE
BIG TAX GURUS ARE ALL GROSSLY IGNORANT OF THE LAW AND LEGALLY INCOMPETENT AND
THEREFORE THEY SHOULD ALL BE PUT OUT OF THE BUSINESS OF GIVING ANY LEGAL ADVICE
AND ESPECIALLY REGARDING . . . FEDERAL INCOME TAX MATTERS!!!!
THE SAME GOES FOR ALL THE BAR CARD CARRYING TAX ATTORNEYS WHO HAVE NOT
CORRECTED ALL THESE LEGALLY INCOMPETENT PAYTRIOT FOR PROFIT TAX HONESTY GURUS
MISTAKES!!!!
QUESTION: HOW COME NO BAR CARD CARRYING TAX ATTORNEY HAS EVER POINTED OUT
THESE FLAWS WHEN THEY STOOD RIGHT NEXT TO THE PATRIOT LEADERS AND HEARD IT WITH
THEIR OWN EARS??????????????????
ANSWER: DUH, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE A PAYING CLIENT TO REPRESENT AT TRIAL IF
YOU NEVER GET CHARGED WITH A FEDERAL TAX CRIME, WOULD THEY?????
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE WHICH TAX ATTORNEYS DO YOU SEE HANGING OUT WITH PATRIOTS AND
TAX HONESTY LEADERS ON A CONSISTENT BASIS OVER THE YEARS AT ALL THE DIFFERENT
PATRIOT EXPOS OR PATRIOT JUBILEES OR TEA PARTIES OR TRUTH ATTACKS OR
CONTINENTAL CONGRESS MEETINGS!!!!
FOR 10 TO 12 YEARS OR MORE AND IN SOME CASES WE SEE THE SAME OLD PATRIOT
LEADERS AND TAX HONESTY LEADERS FOR 20 YEARS PLUS PUBLICLY SPEAKING ABOUT THE
STATUTES DEFINING EMPLOYEE AND EMPLOYER CITED BELOW!!!!
FOR 10 TO 20 YEARS WE ALL HAVE SEEN THE SAME ATTORNEYS STANDING AROUND AND
LISTENING TO ALL THESE TAX GURUS SPEECHES AND SEMINARS AND NEVER CORRECTING
THEM EITHER BECAUSE THEY KNEW THESE WERE TRAPS DESIGNED TO ENTRAP GOVERNMENT
RESISTERS AND IRS TAX PROTESTORS AND THEY HOPE TO PICK UP A CLIENT SO THEY CAN
MAKE MONEY REPRESENTING THEM WHEN THEY GET CRIMINAL CHARGES FILED AGAINST THEM
AND ALL THESE SO CALLED TAX ATTORNEY EXPERTS KEPT QUIET BECAUSE WHY SHOULD THEY
TELL YOU IN ADVANCE THAT THESE WERE FRAUDULENT AND INVALID LEGAL ARGUMENTS THAT
WOULD NOT WORK IN COURT, DUH, YOU’D NEVER GET CHARGED AND THEY
WOULD NOT HAVE A CLIENT THAT’S WHY!!!!
ON THE FLIP SIDE OF THAT LAST ARGUMENT IF ANY BAR CARD TAX ATTORNEY WHO HANGS
OUT WITH ALL THESE PATRIOT LEADERS AND TAX HONESTY LEADERS WILL NOW FALSELY
CLAIM OR TRUTH FULLY CLAIM THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW OR UNDERSTAND THESE ARGUMENTS
ARE JUST PLAIN WRONG, I THINK IT IS FAIR TO SAY THAT . . . ALL OF THEM . .
. JUST PLED GUILTY TO BEING . . . GROSSLY . . . AND . .
. LEGALLY INCOMPETENT!!!!!
WHETHER ALL THESE . . . TAX HONESTY GURUS . . . AND ALL . . . THE
ATTORNEYS . . . THAT THEY HANG OUT WITH AT ALL THESE PATRIOT EXPOS, ETC., . . .
ARE ALL . . . “UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT AGENTS” . . . OR . .
. “IRS SNOOPS” . . . WHO ARE DIRECTLY ON THE GOVERNMENT
PAYROLL . . . OR . . . JUST PATRIOTS WITH . . . “GOOD INTENTIONS” .
. . IT DOES NOT MATTER, BECAUSE . . . “WHAT WAS THE ROAD TO HELL PAVED
WITH” . . . AND BOTTOM LINE IT DOES NOT MATTER BECAUSE THE END RESULT IS
THE SAME WHEN IT IS YOU . . . WHO GOES TO PRISON . . . AND/OR GETS HIT
WITH . . . A $5,000.00 FRIVOLOUS FILING FEE, . . . DOES IT REALLY MATTER????
I SEE NO DIFFERENCE DO YOU????
WHETHER ALL OF THEM ARE AGENTS OR IDIOTS DOES NOT MATTER!!!!
THEY SHOULD ALL BE PUT OUT OF BUSINESS PERIOD!!!!
* * *
HAS ANYONE EVER NOTICED HOW ALL THE BIG KNOW IT ALL TAX GURUS . . . NEVER EVER
. . . GO OVER . . . “THE DEFINITION” . . . OR THE . . .
“MEANING” . . . OF THE FOLLOWING 2 TERMS:
1.) “. . . or any political subdivision thereof, . . .”
2.) “. . . or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing.
. . .”
ALL OF THE TAX GURUS JUST QUICKLY GLOSS OVER . . . “26 U.S.C. 3401
(c)” . . . AND THEN QUICKLY LEAD YOU AROUND BY YOUR NOSE TO LOOK AT OTHER
UN-RELATED STATUTES AND CASE LAW????
HOW COME . . . “PETE HENDRICKSON” . . . and . . . “RANDAL
WHITE” . . . NEVER . . . “INCLUDED” . . . THE
DEFINITIONS . . . OF THOSE . . . “TWO PHRASES” . . .
THAT ARE CLEARLY . . . “INCLUDED” . . . in . . . “26 U.S.C.
3401 (c)” . . . in their keep you busy looking at other statutes in their
silly . . . “MEMORANDUM OF LAW”????
HOW COME . . . “PETE HENDRICKSON” . . . and . . .
“RANDAL WHITE” . . . NEVER . . . cited any cases from . . .
“THE ANNOTATED CASE LAW” . . . in . . . “26
U.S.C. 3401 (c)" . . . in their silly . . . “MEMORANDUM OF
LAW”????
Every law study group, every patriot group and every tax honesty group in this
country needs to make 20 to 30 photocopies of the entire . . . “26 U.S.C.
3401 ANNOTATED CASE LAW SECTION" . . . and study all the case quotations
at your next meeting!!!!
You will soon discover that literally . . . ALMOST EVERY CASE . . . that is not
a state or federal entity is a . . .PRIVATE CORPORATION . . . that was . .
. LICENSED . . . to do do business in the . . STATE . . . as was .
. . REQUIRED TO WITHHOLD!!!!
THESE TAX GURUS AND TAX ATTORNEYS ARE ALL WRONG PERIOD!!!!
I THINK THAT THEY ALL KNOW THEY ARE WRONG!!!!
I THINK THAT ALL THE TAX GURUS AND TAX ATTORNEYS ARE ALL MISSTATING THE LAW AND
STATUTES OUT OF CONTEXT WITH THEIR TRUE MEANING ON PURPOSE TO SET ALL YOU
PATRIOTS UP FOR A BUST LATER!!!!
I THINK THEY ARE ALL AGENTS PERIOD!!!!
OR IF THEY DON’T KNOW, I JUST PROVED THAT ALL OF THEM ARE REALLY . . .
STUPID!!!!
EVERY STATE LICENSED CORPORATION IS IN FACT AND LAW . . . “A POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE” . . . as contemplated by . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401.
EVERY PRIVATE SECTOR CORPORATION THAT WAS ISSUED A MASTERS BUSINESS LICENSE AND
FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER LIKE . . . MCDONALDS . . . or . . . STARBUCKS COFFEE . .
. IS IN FACT AND LAW . . . “AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE” . . .
as contemplated by . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401.
How many different ways do I have to write the same thing over and over again
to make all of you folks out there understand that . . . ALL OF THESE SO CALLED
. . . TAX GURUS . . . and . . . ALL THEIR TAX ATTORNEY FRIENDS . . . ARE BULLSHITTING
YOU????????????????
EITHER ALL OF THEM ARE . . . UNDERCOVER AGENTS . . . SETTING YOU UP FOR A BUST
LATER . . . or they are all just really . . . STUPID????
WHICH 1 IS IT?????
* * *
Note: “Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the
truth?” Galations 4:16
HERE ARE THE . . . FIFTEEN (15) . . . GUARANTEED & SURE FIRE WAYS . .
. TO SPOT AN . . . UNDERCOVER IRS SNOOP . .. or . . . PATRIDIOT:
1.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO PUTS OUT DISTRIBUTES, GIVES AWAY OR SELLS . .
. “STOP WITHHOLDING FORMS” . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS
AGENT . . . or . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
2.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT THE TERM . . .
“WAGES” . . . AS PROVIDED BY . . . “26 U.S.C. 3401 (a)
. . . ONLY APPLIES TO STATE OR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND DOES NOT APPLY TO WORKERS
IN . . . “THE PRIVATE SECTOR” . . . IS PROBABLY AN . . . UNDERCOVER
IRS AGENT . . . or . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
3.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT THE TERM . . .
“WAGES” . . . AS PROVIDED BY . . . “26 U.S.C. 3121
(a)” . . . ONLY APPLIES TO STATE OR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AS DEFINED BY . . .
“26 U.S.C. 3121 (e)(2)” . . . AND DOES NOT APPLY TO WORKERS IN THE
ALLEGED . . . “PRIVATE SECTOR” . . . IS PROBABLY AN . . .
UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . or . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
4.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 USC 3401 (c) . .
. DEFINITION OF . . . EMPLOYEE . . . ONLY APPLIES TO EMPLOYEES OF THE
FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT AND ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT 26
USC 3401 (c) DOES NOT APPLY TO EMPLOYEES OF THE ALLEGED . . . PRIVATE
SECTOR . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . or . . .
PATRIDIOT!!!!
5.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 404.104 . . .
DEFINITION OF . . . EMPLOYEE . . . AS PUBLISHED ON PAGE 12267 OF THE
FEDERAL REGISTER, ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1943 ONLY APPLIES TO EMPLOYEES
OF THE FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT AND ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS
THAT 404.104 DOES NOT APPLY TO EMPLOYEES OF . . . THE ALLEGED PRIVATE SECTOR .
. . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . or . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
6.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C. 7701
(a)(9) & (10) . . . DEFINITION OF . . . “INCLUDES”
. . . SOMEHOW MAGICALLY DOES NOT APPLY TO ANY OF . . . THE 50 CORPORATE STATES
. . . IN THE CURRENT . . . NEW UNION . . . TODAY IN 2009 . . .LIKE . . .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA . . . or . . . STATE OF TEXAS . . . or . . . STATE OF
ALABAMA . . . BUT SOMEHOW ONLY APPLIES TO . . . A FEDERAL STATE . . . ,
e.g., THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BUT NOT A FOREIGN STATE SUCH AS . . . SPAIN . .
. OR . . . FRANCE . . . WHICH ARE NOT LOCATED ON THIS CONTINENT IS
PROBABLY AN . . . UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . or . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
7.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26
U.S.C. 7701 (a)(9) & (10) . . . DEFINITION OF . . .
“INCLUDES” . . . DOES NOT INCLUDE A UNION STATE SUCH AS . . .
“California” . . . OR . . . “Texas” . .
. WHICH DO NOT EXIST TODAY IN . . . THE NEW UNION, BECAUSE BOTH OF THOSE
. . . “States” . . . in . . . “THE OLD UNION” . .
. WERE DESTROYED AT THE END OF THE CIVIL WAR AND THEIR . . . Constitutions . .
. WERE SUSPENDED AND PLACED INTO . . . “THE ARCHIVES DIVISION OF
THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE.”
8.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C. 7701
(a)(9) . . . DEFINITION OF . . . “STATE”. . . SOMEHOW
MAGICALLY DOES NOT APPLY TO THE FEDERAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AND / OR UNITED
STATES CORPORATIONS WHICH ARE BOTH . . . “FEDERAL STATES” . . .
SUCH AS . . . “STATE OF CALIFORNIA” . . . or . . .
“STATE OF TEXAS” . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT .
. . or . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
9.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C. 7701
(a)(10) . . . DEFINITION OF . . . “UNITED STATES”. .
. SOMEHOW MAGICALLY ONLY MEANS . . . “A FEDERAL STATE”, . .
. e.g., . . . “THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”, . . . OR A STATE
LISTED IN THE SAME GENERAL CLASS, SUCH AS . . . “THE COMMONWEALTH OF
PUERTO RICO” . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . or . .
. PATRIDIOT!!!!
10.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C.
3121 (e)(1) . . . DEFINITION OF . . . “STATE”. . . ONLY
INCLUDES OR MEANS ONLY . . . “THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” . . . or .
. . “THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO” . . . or . . . “THE
VIRGIN ISLANDS” . . . or . . . “GUAM” . . . or . . .
“AMERICAN SAMOA” . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . or
. . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
11.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C. 3121
(e)(2) . . . DEFINITION OF . . . “UNITED STATES”. . .
ONLY INCLUDES OR MEANS ONLY . . . THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO . . . or . .
. “THE VIRGIN ISLANDS” . . . or . . . “GUAM” . . . or .
. . “AMERICAN SAMOA” . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . .
. or . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
12.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C. 6103
(b)(5) . . . DEFINITION OF . . . “STATE”. . . ONLY
INCLUDES OR MEANS ONLY . . . “FEDERAL STATES” . . . SUCH AS . . .
“THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” . . . or . . . “THE COMMONWEALTH
OF PUERTO RICO” . . . or . . . “THE VIRGIN ISLANDS” . . . or
. . . “GUAM” . . . or . . . “AMERICAN SAMOA” . . . or .
. . “THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS” . . . BUT ALSO FALSELY CLAIMS
THAT IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ANY OF THE 50 FEDERAL DISTRICT STATES IN THE
NEW UNION TODAY IN 2009 SUCH AS . . . “STATE OF CALIFORNIA” . . .
OR . . . “STATE OF TEXAS” . . . or . . . “STATE OF
ALABAMA” . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . or . . .
PATRIDIOT!!!!
13.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO ADVISES YOU TO APPLY FOR ANY TYPE OF . . .
“REFUNDS OF MONEY” . . . THAT YOU PROBABLY ARE NOT LEGALLY ENTITLED
TO . . . IS PROBABLY AN . . . UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . OR . . . PATRIDIOT!!!!
14.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO PUTS . . . “LEGAL DISCLAIMERS” .
. . on their advertisements is probably an . . . UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT!!!!
15.) ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO ARGUES THAT 861 PROVIDES . . . A BLANKET TAX
EXEMPTION . . . FOR ALL DOMESTIC SOURCE INCOME . . . THAT FAILED TO PRESENT THE
PROPER JURY INSTRUCTION THAT . . . THE 861 DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC SOURCE INCOME
. . . “HAS 2 SUB-DEFINITIONS” . . . 1 SUB-DEFINITION THAT SAYS
FOREIGN SOURCE INCOME WHICH YOU HAVE TO REPORT . . . AND . . . THE OTHER
SUB-DEFINITION THAT ALSO SAYS DOMESTIC SOURCE INCOME THAT YOU DON’T HAVE
TO REPORT . . . IS PROBABLY AN . . . UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT . . . OR . . .
PATRIDIOT!!!!
* * *
THE FIRST MISTAKE THAT ALL THESE BIG KNOW IT ALL TAX GURUS MAKE IS THAT THEY
FAIL TO MAKE THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE STATE’S . . . “PRIVATE
ENTERPRISE” . . . AS OPPOSED TO THOSE WHO ARE ENGAGED IN . . .
“FREE ENTERPRISE.”
If you go to your CORPORATE STATE and apply for a . . . MASTER BUSINESS LICENSE
. . . to sell . . . BIKINI BOTTOM MOCHAS . . . or . . . STARBUCKS COFFEE
. . .your . . . CORPORATE STATE . . . issues you . . . A MASTER BUSINESS
LICENSE . . . and a . . . FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER . . . or . . . UBI NUMBER!!!!
THE CORPORATE STATES . . . in . . . ALL 50 STATES . . . in . . . THE NEW UNION
. . . have the absolute inherent authority and power and jurisdiction to
REGULATE and TAX all of their PRIVATE SECTOR CORPORATIONS like . . . MCDONALDS
. . . BURGER KING . . . TACO BELL . . . KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN . . .
BASKIN ROBBINS . . . ALBERTSONS GROCERY STORE . . . SAFEWAY GROCERY STORE
. . . 7-11 . . . MINI-MART . . . SEARS . . . JC PENNEYS . . . BON MACY’S
. . . AL’S AUTO SUPPLY . . . JORVE ROOFING . . . ALLEY CHEVROLET . . .
WINDERMERE REAL ESTATE.
ALL OF THOSE PRIVATE SECTOR CORPORATIONS ARE LICENSED ENTITIES CREATED BY THE
CORPORATE STATE!!!!
ALL OF THOSE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS ARE IN FACT AND LAW . . . “UNITED
STATES CORPORATIONS,” . . . DUH!!!!
THE FEDERAL DISTRICT STATES HAVE THE RIGHT TO REGULATE AND TAX THEIR . . .
PRIVATE ENTERPRISES . . . PERIOD!!!!
THE FEDERAL DISTRICT STATES IN . . . THE NEW UNION . . . HAVE THE RIGHT TO
REGULATE AND TAX THEIR . . . PRIVATE SECTOR . . . EMPLOYEES . . . AND . . .
EMPLOYERS!!!!
IF YOU ARE AN EMPLOYEE OF ANY OF THOSE STATE LICENSED CORPORATIONS, YOU ARE
WORKING IN . . . “THE FEDERAL STATES PRIVATE ENTERPRISE”!!!!
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN . . . “PRIVATE ENTERPRISE” . . . AND
. . . “FREE ENTERPRISE”!!!!
THE 50 CORPORATE STATES HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO REGULATE OR TAX THOSE WHO ARE
ENGAGED IN THEIR . . . “RIGHT TO CONTRACT” . . . AND WHO ARE
ENGAGED IN . . . “FREE ENTERPRISE”!!!!
If Luis Ewing and his 3 sons decide to sell Mochas as . . . LUIS EWING’S
MOCHA STAND . . . and we do NOT go to the CORPORATE STATE to apply for any . .
. BUSINESS LICENSE . . . and just start selling Mochas to private
individuals, we are engaged in our “right to contract” and we
are engaged in . . . “FREE ENTERPRISE.”
We are NOT conducting any . . . BUSINESS . . . “in this State” . .
. or . . . “within this State.”
It’s an . . . “A & B CONVERSATION” . . . and the . . .
“DISTRICT STATE OF WASHINGTON”. . . U.S. ATTORNEYS . . . AND . . .
JUDGES . . . “C THERE WAY OUT OF IT” . . . BECAUSE . . .
“THE DISTRICT STATE OF WASHINGTON” . . . CANNOT IMPAIR THE
OBLIGATION OF A CONTRACT!!!!
“THE CASE LAW” . . . “ONE (1) PATRIDIOT NAMED L.B. BORK SAYS
HIS NUMBER 1 RULE IS FOR YOU TO NOT TO READ CASE LAW . . . WHICH IS SILLY,
BECAUSE THE CASE LAW HE SAYS NOT TO READ SAYS” . . . that we have . . .
“THE COMMON LAW RIGHT” . . . to reach our hands into the hole or
opening in the doorway of . . . “THE STREAM OF COMMERCE” . . . and
get out money out . . . “WITHOUT” . . . actually having to enter .
. . “THE STREAM OF COMMERCE”!!!!
Sorry, you will have to wait for my 2 Seminars next year to get those cites!
Luis Ewing and his 3 sons have no . . . “MINIMAL CONTACTS” . . .
with the . . . “DISTRICT STATE OF WASHINGTON”!!!!
THE SECOND MISTAKE THAT ALL THESE BIG KNOW IT ALL TAX GURUS MAKE IS THAT THEY
FAIL TO RECOGNIZE THAT EVERY PERSON OR BUSINESS OR CORPORATION THAT APPLIES TO
THE CORPORATE STATE FOR A MASTERS BUSINESS LICENSE TO DO BUSINESS IN THE
DISTRICT STATE, IN THIS STATE OR WITHIN THIS STATE IS ISSUED A FEDERAL
TAX ID NUMBER IS IN FACT AND LAW A UNITED STATES CORPORATION.
1.) THIS APPLIES TO EVERY . . . GENERAL CONTRACTOR!!!!
2.) THIS APPLIES TO EVERY . . . ROOFING CONTRACTOR!!!!
3.) THIS APPLIES TO EVERY . . . LICENSED PLUMBER!!!!
4.) THIS APPLIES TO EVERY . . . LICENSED ELECTRICIAN!!!!
EVERY STATE LICENSED CORPORATION IS IN FACT AND LAW . . “A
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE”. . . AS CONTEMPLATED BY . . .
“26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)”!!!!
EVERY STATE LICENSED CORPORATION IS IN FACT AND LAW . . . “A
INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE” . . . AS CONTEMPLATED BY . . . “26
U.S.C. 3401 (c)”!!!!
See RCW 82.04.200 "In this
state" and "WITHIN THIS STATE" "IN THIS
STATE" and "WITHIN THIS STATE" includes all federal areas lying
within the exterior boundaries of the state. [1961 c 15 82.04.200.
Prior: 1955 c 389 21; prior L 1949 c 228 2,
part; 1945 c 249 1, part; 1943 c 156 2, part;
1941 c 178 2, part; 1939 c 225 2, part; 1937 c 227 2,
part; 1935 c 180 5, part; Rem. Supp. 1949 8370-5,
part.] (emphasis added). And;
“Both parties agreed that, prior to
the passage of the Buck Act (1940) 4 U.S.C.A. SSSS 105-110, the various states
of the Union had no legal basis for imposing a tax on the activities of a
business or individual, when such activities were carried on exclusively within
the confines of a federal reservation. They are also in agreement that
the effect of the Buck Act was to grant to the states certain taxing
powers. This is specifically provided in 4 U.S.C.A. 4 106:”
“(a) No person shall be relieved
from liability for any income tax levied by any State, or by any duly
constituted taxing authority therein, having jurisdiction to levy such a tax,
by reason of his residing within a Federal area or receiving income from
transactions occurring or services performed in such area; and such State or
taxing authority shall have full jurisdiction and powers to levy and collect
such tax in any Federal area within such State to the same extent and with the
same effect as though such area was not a Federal area.” Alaska v.
Baker, 64 Wn.2d 207, 390 P.2d 1009 (1964) And;
“The area within, and under, the
jurisdiction of a state may come under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United
States by purchase by the Federal Government for a purpose prescribed by the
Federal Constitution and with the consent of the state, or by cession of
exclusive jurisdiction by the state to the United States. In either event,
the land acquires a territorial status and ceases to be a part of the state,
either territorially or jurisdictionally. Concessions Co. v. Morris, 109
Wash. 46, 186 Pac. 655.” RYAN v. STATE, 188 Wash. 115,
130 [No. 26060. En Banc. October 28, 1936.] And;
“Irrespective of what tax is called
by state law, if its purpose is to produce revenue, it is income tax or
receipts tax Under Buck Act [4 U.S.C.S. sections 105-110".”
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Calvert, (1971) 464 S.W.2d 170, affd. (Tex.)
478 S.W.2d 926, cert den. 409 U.S. 967, 34 L.Ed.2d 234, 93 S.Ct. 293.
"IN THIS STATE," "WITHIN THIS STATE" as stated in the
above RCW Code Section is not one of the united States of America in its
original jurisdiction, nor is it part of "The State of
Washington." See page 94 Session Laws of 1889-1890, December
13, 1889, making by Legislative Fiat, "State" or
"State of Washington" in the Law mean, Territory or Territory
of Washington. “WA” is a “fictional State within a
state” which was NOT in existence at the time of the creation of The
State of Washington, nor was it in existence at the time of the creation of the
Territorial Code of 1881 which is still valid law today pursuant to the fact
that the Code of 1881 has never been repealed. And
In addition to the foregoing, RCW
46.04.360, under the section titled "Nonresident," reads:
"Nonresident" means any person whose residence is outside this state
and who is temporarily sojourning WITHIN THIS STATE. [1961 c 12 §
46.04.360. Prior: 1959 c 49 § 37; prior: (i) 1943 c 153 § 1,
part; 1937 c 188 § 1, part; Rem. Supp. 1943 § 6312-1, part. (ii)
1937 c 189 § 1, part; RRS § 6360-1, part.] (emphasis added)
“Respondent contends article 2(a)
RCW 9.100.010 supports its argument that “state”, as used in RCW
9.95.120, includes the United States. However reference to article 2(a)
supports petitioner’s contention. Article 2(a) specifically defines
“state” to include the United States, making it clear that when the
legislature intends the word “state” to include the federal
jurisdiction., it has done so with language clearly manifesting that
intent.” IN RE LEHMAN, 93 Wn.2d 25, 27, 28 [No. 46150. En
Banc. January 10, 1980.] And;
“The territory
is a municipal corporation and government, representing all the people within
its borders. The county of Spokane is an agency of the territory to carry
on certain functions of government. Neither the territory nor county are
the real party in interest; but the inhabitants are. The territory by
statute is authorized to accept and collect these bonds for the use of the
people, and is a trustee of a trust expressed by statute.”
AINSWORTH v. TERRITORY OF WASHINGTON, 2 Wash. Territory 270, 278 (Janaury 21,
1887). And;
“That a state government comes
within the purview of the act is manifest by the definition of
“person” contained in section 302 (h) (U.S.C.A. (Supt.), section
942 (h)). If state governments are not included within the term “any
other government,” then no political subdivision of any state nor any
state agency comes within the purview of the act, for, obviously, the political
subdivisions and agencies “of the foregoing” are such as are set up
and included within “any other government” within the scope of the
act.” SOUNDVIEW PULP CO. v. TAYLOR, 21 Wn.(d) 261, 276 ((July 22,
1944.) And;
“The state acts in two capacities:
governmental and proprietary. The distinction between the two is best
stated in Cincinnati v. Cameron, 33 Ohio St. 336, approved by this court in
Seattle v. Stirrat, 55 Wash. 560, 104 Pac. 834, 30 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1275:
“In its governmental or public
character, it represents the state, while in the other it is a mere private
corporation. As a political institution, the municipality occupies a
different position, and is subject to different liabilities from those which
are imposed upon the private corporation. But because these two
characters are united in the same legal entity, it does not follow that the
shield which covers the political equally protects the private
corporation.” STRAND v. STATE., 16 Wn.(2d) 107, 116 (January 6,
1943). And;
STATE OF WASHINGTON . . . IS A . . .UNITED STATES CORPORATION . . . AND HAS A .
. . FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA . . . IS A . . . UNITED STATES CORPORATION . . . AND HAS A
. . . . FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER.
STATE OF TEXAS . . . IS A . . . UNITED STATES CORPORATION . . . AND HAS A
FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER.
ALL 3 STATES ARE UNITED STATES CORPORATIONS . . . IN THE . . . NEW UNION!!!!
ALL 3 STATES . . . ARE . . . DISTRICT STATES!!!!
ALL 3 STATES . . . ARE . . . FEDERAL DISTRICT STATES!!!!
ALL 3 DISTRICT STATES HAVE . . . NEW CONSTITUTIONS . . . AND A . . . NEW
GOVERNMENT!!!!
ALL 3 STATES ARE . . . “FEDERAL STATES.”
THAT IS WHERE . . . EDWIN RIVERA . . . PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL . . . CHRISTOPHER
HANSEN . . . RALPH WINTERROWD . . . L.B. BORK . . . AND . . . PETE
HENDRICKSON . . . HAVE ALL . . . “MISSED THE BOAT.”
THAT IS WHERE ALL . . . “STATE CITIZEN GROUPS” . . . AND . . .
“EXPATRIATORS” . . . AND . . . “THE COMMON LAW COURT
MOVEMENT” . . . “MISSED THE BOAT”!!!!
AND YOU WONDER WHY ALL THE JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS . . . LAUGHED . . . AND
. . . SNICKERED . . . AND . . . RIDICULED . . . ALL . . . THE PATRIDIOTS
. . . WHO WENT INTO COURT AND CLAIMED THAT THEY WERE NOT . . . “A 14TH
AMENDMENT SLAVE CITIZEN OF THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES” . . . BUT WERE IN
FACT A . . . “CITIZEN OF THE STATE” . . . HA, HA, HA, I’M
LAUGHING TOO!!!!
ALL THESE DUMB PATRIDIOTS PUT THEMSELVES RIGHT BACK INTO . . . THE FEDERAL SOUP
. . . THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO GET OUT OF!!!!
THE DISTRICT COURTS HAVE ALWAYS HAD JURISDICTION IN . . . “THE
TERRITORIES” . . . AND . . . “THE POSSESSIONS”!!!!
“STATE OF WASHINGTON” . . . IS BOTH . . . “A TERRITORY”
. . . AND . . . “A POSSESSION.”
When you read . . . THE BUCK ACT . . . you will see that the term . . .
“STATE” . . . INCLUDES . . . “ANY TERRITORY” . . . OR .
. . “POSSESSION” . . . OF THE . . . “UNITED
STATES”!!!!
These definitions are consistent with the definitions mandated by the
“BUCK ACT” which states in part:
“110(d) The term “State” includes any
Territory or possession of the United States.” And;
“11(e) The term “Federal Area” means any
lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or
any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal
area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of
any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such
State.”
HOW COME . . . “PETE HENDRICKSON” . . . and . . . “RANDAL
WHITE” . . . did not . . . INCLUDE THIS FEDERAL BUCK ACT STATUTE . . . IN
THEIR ANALYSIS OF . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)????
THE TERM . . . STATE . . . INCLUDES . . . ANY TERRITORY . . . OR . . .
POSSESSION . . . OF THE UNITED STATES!!!!
The Social Security Department created 10 social security districts which like
a thin plastic sheet overlay all the 50 states of the union. This creates
a “fictional federal state within a state,” for the purposes of
applying the “Public Salary Tax Act” to these areas.
“There has been created a fictional
Federal “state within a state.” Howard v. Commisioners of
Sinking fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73. S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617
(1953); Schwartz v. O’Hara TP. School Dist., 100 A.2d 621, 625, 375 Pa.
440.
(Compare also 31 C.F.R. Part 51.2 and
52.2, which also identifies a fictional State within a state.)
This fictional “State” is identified by the use of two-letter
abbreviations like ‘WA”, “OR”,
“ID”, “AZ”, and “TX” as distinguished form
the authorized abbreviations like “Wash.”, etc. This
fictional State also uses a ZIP codes which are within the municipal, exclusive
legislative jurisdiction of Congress. And;
There is a vestige of State sovereignty remaining which
cannot be acquired by the United States (District of Columbia) because of the
limitation of the United States to powers delegated under the
Constitution. See Cal. 7 Ops Atty Gen. 628; 37 Am. Jur, Municipal Corp
sections 23, 26; Wichita Falls v. Bowen, 143 Tex. 45, 182 S.W.2d., 154 A.L.R.
1434; 62 CJS, Mun. Corp. section 46, page 133; Norfolk County v. Portsmouth,
186 Va. 1032, 45 S.E.2d. 136; Anchorage v. Akers, (D.C. Alaska), 100 F.Supp. 2;
Kiker v. Philadelphia, 346 Pa. 624, 31 A.2d 289.
This was accomplished by the institution of the “Buck Act,” 4
U.S.C.S. sections 104-113, to implement the application of the “Public
Salary Tax Act of 1939 to the “employees” working within the so
called private sector. This makes all so called private sector workers
who have and “use” a Social Security number subject to all State
and Federal laws “within the State” a “fictional Federal
area” overlaying all the land “within” the United States.
See RCW Titles 46 and 47 wherein their code sections apply only to the above
defined federal areas, to wit: "In this state" and "within this
state. See the Buck Act of 1940 cited below at page 4, lines 22-24, to
wit: it’s codification at USC 4, §§ 105,110, et. sec., is the ciliset or
vidiliset. And;
RCW 82.04.010 Introductory.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions set forth in the
sections preceding RCW 82.04.220 apply throughout this chapter. [1996 c 93 § 4;
1961 c 15 § 82.04.010. Prior: 1955 c 389 § 2; prior: 1949 c
228 § 2, part; 1945 c 249 § 1, part; 1943 c 156 § 2, part; 1941 c 178 § 2,
part; 1939 c 225 § 2, part; 1937 c 227 § 2, part; 1935 c 180 § 5, part; Rem.
Supp. 1949 § 8370-5, part.]. And;
CHAPTER 82.52 EXTENSION OF EXCISES TO FEDERAL AREAS
Sections
82.52.010 STATE ACCEPTS PROVISIONS OF FEDERAL
(BUCK) ACT.
82.52.020 STATE'S TAX LAWS MADE APPLICABLE TO
FEDERAL
AREAS--EXCEPTION.
NOTES: Federal areas and jurisdiction: Title 37 RCW. Taxation of federal
agencies and instrumentalities: State Constitution Art. 7 §§
1, 3. And;
RCW 82.52.010 STATE ACCEPTS PROVISIONS OF FEDERAL (BUCK) ACT.
The state hereby accepts jurisdiction over all federal areas located
“within” its exterior boundaries to the extent that the power and
authority to levy and collect taxes therein is granted by that certain act of
the 76th congress of the United States, approved by the president on October 9,
1940, and entitled: "An Act to permit the states to extend their
sales, use, and income taxes TO PERSONS RESIDING OR CARRYING ON BUSINESS, OR TO
TRANSACTIONS OCCURRING, IN FEDERAL AREAS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." [1961 c
15 § 82.52.010. Prior: 1941 c 175 § 1; Rem. Supp. 1941 § 11337-10.]
And;
RCW 47.04.050 Acceptance of federal acts.
The “STATE OF WASHINGTON” hereby assents to the purposes,
provisions, terms and conditions of the grant of money provided in an act of
congress entitled: "An act to provide that the United States shall
aid the states in the construction of rural post roads, and for other
purposes," approved July 11, 1916, and all acts, grants and appropriations
amendatory and supplementary thereto and affecting the “STATE OF
WASHINGTON”. [1961 c 13 § 47.04.050. Prior: 1937 c 53 § 43;
RRS § 6400-43; 1917 c 76 § 1; RRS § 6844.] And;
RCW 47.42.920 FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS--CONFLICT AND ACCORD.
If the secretary of the United States department of transportation finds any
part of this chapter to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a
prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the
“state”, the conflicting part of this chapter is hereby declared to
be inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict and with respect to the
agencies directly affected, and such finding or determination shall not affect
the operation of the remainder of this chapter in its application to the
agencies concerned. THE RULES UNDER THIS CHAPTER SHALL MEET FEDERAL
REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE A NECESSARY CONDITION TO THE RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS BY
THE STATE. [1985 c 142 § 4.] And;
In addition to the foregoing, RCW 46.04.360, under the section titled
"Nonresident," reads:
"Nonresident" means any person whose
residence is outside this state and who is temporarily sojourning WITHIN THIS
STATE. [1961 c 12 § 46.04.360. Prior: 1959 c 49 § 37;
prior: (i) 1943 c 153 § 1, part; 1937 c 188 § 1, part; Rem. Supp.
1943 § 6312-1, part. (ii) 1937 c 189 § 1, part; RRS § 6360-1,
part.] (emphasis added) And;
This Court must take Mandatory Judicial Notice ER201 of CR 44.1 Determination
of Foreign Law of which I now object, take exception and make an OFFER OF PROOF
ER 103(2) that this “fictional court” has NO jurisdiction in the
premises for failure to provide proof that I was “DRIVING” . .
. a . . . “MOTOR VEHICLE” . . . in a . . .
“FEDERAL AREA” . . . “in this State” . . . or . . .
“within this State.” See California and North
Carolina’s consistent definition’s of those states “municipal
law’s” which require some sort of “contract” for proper
application within the “federal areas” of the “NEW
UNION.”
“Section 11205. “In this State,”
etc.
“In this State” or “in the State”
means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all
territory within these limits owned or ceded to the United States of
America. Added Stats 1941 section 1, effective July 1, 1943. Prior
Law: Stats 1937 ch. 283 section 2 subd (d) p 621, as amended by Stats 1941 ch
162 section 1 p 1202.” And;
“Section 6017. “In this State” or
“in the State”
“In this State” or “in the State”
means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all
territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of
America. Added Stats 1941 ch 36 section 1, effective July 1, 1943.
Prior Law: (a) Stats 1933 ch 1020 section 2 subd (i) p 2599, as amended by
Stats 1935 ch 357 section 2 p 1256, Stats 1937 ch 778 section 1 p 2223, Stats
1939 ch 679 section 2 p 2170, Stats 1941 ch 247 section 1 p 1321. (b)
Stats 1935 ch. 361 section 2 subd (j) p 1297, as amended by Stats 1937 ch 683
section 1 p 1936, Stats 1939 ch 677 section 1 p 2154, Stats 1941 ch 247
section 14 p 1334. And;
“N.C. G.S. 105-164.3(7) “In this State” or
“in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of
North Carolina and includes all territories within such limits owned or
ceded to the United States of America. (Added Stats. 1941, c. 36,
p. 536, section 1.)”
“N.C. G.S. Sections 105-187.2 A tax is imposed
for the privilege of using the highways of this State. This tax is in
addition to all other taxes and fees imposed. (Stats. 19889, c.692,
s.4.1)
“N.C. G.S. 12-3 Statutory Construction;
“State” and “United
States”.–The word “state,” when applied to the
different parts of the united States, shall be construed to extend to and
include the District of Columbia and the several territories, so called; and
the words “United States” shall be construed to include the said
districts and territories and all dependencies.’
It is clear that North Carolina Statutes, California Statutes and Washington
Statutes agree completely with the “Buck Act” Title 4 U.S.C.S.
sections 105-110, and is indentical in implication and meaning. This tax
is imposed on every motor vehicle used in any “federal area” such
as the Central District of STATE OF WASHINGTON aka “WA”, Social
Security Area, federal ZIP Code area, etc.
ARE YOU DOING BUSINESS . . . “IN THIS STATE” . . . OR . . .
“WITHIN THIS STATE”????
If you are a . . . STATE LICENSED CORPORATION . . . like . . . MCDONALDS . .
. OR . . . STARBUCKS COFFEE . . . you are . . . “A POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE” . . . as contemplated by . . . “26
U.S.C. 3401 (c)” . . . and . . . “26 U.S.C. 3121
(a)(e)(2)”!!!!
If you are a . . . STATE LICENSED CORPORATION . . . like . . . MCDONALDS . .
. OR . . . STARBUCKS COFFEE . . . you are . . . “AN
INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE” . . . as contemplated by . . .
“26 U.S.C. 3401 (c)” . . . and . . . “26 U.S.C. 3121
(a)(e)(2)”!!!!
“...person shall include the counties, municipalities,
and all political subdivisions of this state.” Strenge v.
Clarke, 89 Wn.2d 23, 31, 569 P.2d 60 [No. 43813. En Banc. September
8, 1977.] And;
“STATE OF CALIFORNIA” . . . IS BOTH . . . “A
TERRITORY” . . . AND . . . “A POSSESSION.”
“STATE OF TEXAS” . . . IS BOTH . . . “A
TERRITORY” . . . AND . . . “A POSSESSION.”
THIS IS WHY THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS DO NOT HAVE TO GO THROUGH
A SO CALLED . . . “STATE EXTRADITION PROCEEDING” . . . TO HAUL ANY
. . . RESIDENT . . . OR . . . INHABITANT . . . WHO IS A DEFENDANT LIVING IN. .
. THE TERRITORY OF WASHINGTON . . . OR . . . TERRITORY OF CALIFORNIA . . . OR .
. . TERRITORY OF TEXAS . . . OR . . . TERRITORY OF ALAMABAM. . . INTO A FEDERAL
TERRITORIAL COURT.
SORRY FOLKS, . . . IT’S . . . ALL . . . FEDERAL!!!!
THE STATE COURTS NO LONGER EXIST IN FACT AND LAW!!!!
IT’S ALL ONE (1) COMPLETE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM!!!!
And if the FIRST ORIGINAL DEJURE Constitution for “The State of
Washington” was . . . NOT SUSPENDED AND PLACED INTO ARCHIVES . . . I
would declare that I was or am domiciled in a . . . judicial district of the
United States . . . (“The State of Washington”) . . . wherein there
was supposed to be District Courts seated (true Art. three Courts) and I would
not, (A) be subject to the jurisdiction of Federal Courts, or (B) enforcement
of summons: see IRC title 26 section 7701 (39): below:
"IF ANY CITIZEN OR RESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DOES
NOT RESIDE I (AND IS NOT FOUND IN) ANY UNITED STATES JUDICIAL DISTRICT, SUCH
CITIZEN OR RESIDENT SHALL BE TREATED AS RESIDING IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FOR PURPOSES OF ANY PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE-
(a) jurisdiction of the
courts, or
(b) enforcement of
summons."
Also see IRC title 26 sec. 7408 (C), added below:,
“(c) Citizens and residents outside the United
States.--If any citizen or resident of the United States does not have his
principal place of business in, any United States judicial district , such
citizen or resident shall be treated for purposes of this section as residing
in the District of Columbia.”
THE CRIMINALLY CORRUPT . . . ATTORNEYS . . . PLANNED IN 1856 TO ABOLISH ALL
JUDICIAL DISTRICTS . . . AND DID ABOLISH ALL JUDICIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE
UNITED STATES . . . PRIOR TO THE CIVIL WAR EVEN STARTING. . . AND DID SO
BY . . . “THE ACT OF THE 34TH CONGRESS” . . . AS CITED IN BOYER v.
FOWLER, WHICH READS IN PART:
“The act of Congress Aug. 16, 1856,
regulating Courts in this Territory, and requiring the Judges of the Supreme
Court to assign places for holding Courts, took effect when the order was made,
pursuant to the act. The Judicial District of King county having been
abolished, by the order of the judges, Nov. 10, 1856, under said act, the clerk
of that Court, from that date, lost his legal existence–hence his
subsequent official acts were nullities. “A majority of the Judges
met in Olympia, then the Capital of the Territory, on the 10th day of November,
1856, and made the necessary order to give effect to the act of Congress.
It has been held by this court, in the case of the Territory vs. Leschi, that
this act took effect from the time the orders were made by the Judges of
the Supreme Court. It is claimed however, that the act of Congress
contemplated something more than an informal meeting of the Judges. It will be
observed on an examination of the act , that no terms are used indicating
orders in term time –the reference is to the orders of the Judges, or a
majority of them, and not of the Court. The organic act confers upon the
Judges the appointment of clerks for the District Courts. King county, up
to the passage of the act of Congress referred to, was a Judicial
District. On the said order of the Judges made the 10th day of November,
1856, the District Court for King County was merged into the District Court for
the Second Judicial District. The clerk of the King county District
Court, for ministerial or judicial purposes, ceased to exist; and as this suit
was instituted subsequently to the order made by the Judges, and the bond on
which the recovery is claimed, was executed on the 13th day of December, 1856,
it follows that there was no District Court for King county –- no clerk
having a legal official existence, and the whole proceeding a nullity.
MARY ANN BOYER vs. MILES FOWLER et al. [1 Wash.T Sup. Ct. Dec. 1860]
YOU CAN FIND . . . “THE ACT OF THE 34TH CONGRESS”. . . THAT WAS
PASSED ON . . . “AUGUST 16, 1856" . . . “ABOLISHING ALL
JUDICIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES” . . . IN . . .
“THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.”
IT IS NOW PRESUMED THAT YOU . . . SHALL BE TREATED FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION
AS . . . “RESIDING IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.”
SEE . . . 26 U.S.C. 4612 (4)(A).
BECAUSE NOW, IT IS . . . IMPOSSIBLE . . . TO BE . . . “FOUND IN A
JUDICIAL DISTRICT” . . . AS CONTEMPLATED BY . . . IRC TITLE 26 SECTION
7408 (c).
BECAUSE ALL JUDICIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES WERE ABOLISHED IN
1856!!!!
“The State of Washington” is NOT the same as . . . “STATE OF
WASHINGTON.”
“The State of California” is NOT the same as . . . “STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.”
“The State of Texas” is NOT the same as . . . “STATE OF
TEXAS.”
THERE ARE . . . “TWO (2) STATES” . . . AND . . . “TWO
(2) CONSTITUTIONS” . . . AND . . . “TWO (2)
GOVERNMENTS” . . . OR . . . MORE IN ALL 50 OF THE NEW STATES IN THE NEW
UNION!!!!
EVERY ONE OF YOU OUT THERE NEEDS TO TAKE A FIELD TRIP TO YOUR STATE CAPITAL AND
VISIT . . . THE ARCHIVES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE . .
. AND INSPECT YOUR . . . FIRST ORIGINAL DEJURE CONSTITUTION TO SEE WHETHER
OR NOT IT WAS LAWFULLY AMENDED!!!!
“Whether a Constitution shall be amended is a
“political question,” but whether it has been legally amended is a
“judicial question.” McConaughy v. Secretary of State, 119
N.W. 408, 413, 106 Minn. 392 Words and Phrases “Political
Question” And;
ASK THE HEAD ARCHIVIST IN YOUR STATE CAPITAL:
1.) HOW MANY CONSTITUTIONS ARE THERE????
2.) WHAT IS THE MAIN PURPOSE OF THE ARCHIVES????
3.) CAN I PLEASE HAVE A COPY OF THE MISSION STATEMENT OF THE ARCHIVES????
4.) CAN I PLEASE HAVE A COPY OF THE FIRST STATUTE THAT CREATED THE
ARCHIVES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF TH SECRETARY OF STATE????
“Courts are not deprived of the
right to pass upon constitutionality of an amendment to an existing
constitution on ground that question is “political question” over
which courts have no control, since question of validity of the adoption of an
amendment to constitution is a “judicial” and not a
“political question”. Graham v. Jones, 3 So.2d 761, 767, 198
La.507 Words and Phrases” “Political Question” And;
The first and only valid Constitution for . . . “The State of
Washington” . . . is the . . .1878 Walla Walla Constitution and happens
to be the 1 and . . . ONLY . . . Washington Constitution that was reviewed and
ordered to be published 50,000 copies by . . . THE 50TH CONGRESS 2d
Session, – SENATE – MIS. DOC. No. 55, IN THE SENATE OF THE
UNITED STATES, JANUARY 28, 1889.
“When a State forms a constitution, which is approved
by Congress, it is estopped to deny its validity. The action of Congress
cannot be inquired into, for the judicial is bound to follow the action of the
political department. White v. Hart, 39 Ga., 306; Powell v. Boon, 43
Ala.l, 459" Luther v. Borden et al., 48 U.S. 1 (1849). And;
It is also Undisputed that the alleged 1889 [c]onstitution at Volume 0 of the
private copy-writed compilation aka “The Revised Code of
Washington” is NOT the Constitution upon which the President of the
United States of America issued his “Proclamation of Statehood” as
that alleged [c]onstitution NEVER went to Congress for approval as required by
Senate Bill 185 i.e. “THE ENABLING ACT” which states in part:
“...the legislature shall remain in abeyance until
Congress approves it.” And;
The alleged Volume 0 Private Copyrighted Revised Code of Washington 1889
[c]onstitution has also proceeded in use, in violation of the Organic Act
which states in part:
“...all laws passed by the
legislative assembly shall be submitted to the Congress of the United States,
and, if disapproved, shall be null and of no effect.”
It is also Undisputed that this court will be unable to produce an
“Authentic” “Handwritten” “Certified” copy
of the alleged [c]onstitution of the State of Washington, certified in the
manner prescribed in the letter from the former governor of the Territory Miles
Moore to the President of the United States of America November 4, 1889 which
states in part:
““To the President: There is
herewith transmitted a copy of the Constitution of the State of Washington,
certified in the manner prescribed in your telegram of this date, attested by
the Secretary, WITH THE SEAL OF THE TERRITORY ATTACHED.”
(November 4tj. 1889). Journeys to the Past, WASHINGTON’S ROAD
TO STATEHOOD 1853-1889, Document 24, Transmittal of the Constitution to the
President Page 42. And;
ARTICLE XVI. AMENDMENTS. SEC.2 & SEC.3 OF THE JANUARY 28, 1889
CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS ANY OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS FROM BEING HELD
WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY OF THE PEOPLE VOTING TO CONVENE SAID CONVENTION.
“SEC. 2 Whenever two-thirds of the
members elected to each branch of the legislature shall deem it necessary to
call a convention to revise or amend this constitution, they shall recommend to
the electors to vote at the next general election, for or against a convention,
and if a majority of all the electors voting at said election shall have voted
for a convention, the legislature shall at the next session provide by law for
calling the same; and such convention shall consist of a number of members, not
less than that of the most numerous branch of the legislature.
SEC.3. Any constitution adopted by
such convention shall have no validity until it has been submitted to, and
adopted by, the people. And;
HOWEVER, . . . REGISTERED VOTERS . . . HAVE . . . NO STANDING . . . TO AMEND A
CONSTITUTION . . . THAT WAS CREATED BY . . . ELECTORS!!!!
“4. The constitution of England is at the mercy
of Parliament. Every act of Parliament is transcendent, and must be
obeyed. Ibid 308.
5. In America, the case is widely
different. Every state of the Union has its constitution, REDUCED
TO WRITTEN EXACTITUDE. A constitution is the form of government
deliniated by the might hand of the people, in which certain first principles
of fundamental law are established. The Constitution is fixed; it
contains the permanent will of the people, and is the supreme law of the land;
it is paramount to the power of the legislature, AND CAN BE REVOKED OR ALTERED
ONLY BY THE POWER THAT MADE IT. THE LIFE-GIVING PRINCIPLE AND THE DEATH
DEALING STROKE MUST PROCEED FROM THE SAME HAND.” The DEBATES in the
several STATE CONVENTIONS on the adoption of the FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, as
recommended by the GENERAL CONVENTION AT PHILADELPHIA, in 1787. Together
with the JOURNAL OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION, Luther Martin’s Letter.
Yates Minutes, CONGRESSIONAL OPINIONS, Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of
98-99 and Other Illustrations of the Constitution in Five Volumes. VOL.
IV. Second Edition, with Considerable Addittions. Collected and
Revised from Contemporary Publications By Jonathan Elliot. PUBLISHED
UNDER THE SANCTION OF CONGRESS – ELLIOT’S DEBATES
–. And;
It is CRYSTAL CLEAR that a Constitution can only be revoked or altered by the
power that made it. The Life Giving principles and death dealing stroke
of all 50 Several States was required to proceed by the same hand!!!!
THAT WAS NOT DONE!!!!
REGISTERED VOTERS . . . DO NOT HAVE THE NECESSARY AND PROPER . . . “LEGAL
STATUS” . . . OR . . . “LEGAL STANDING” . . . TO AMEND OR
CHANGE . . . THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONS FOR THE 50 SEVERAL STATES IN ORIGINAL
JURISDICTION, BUT THIS WAS DONE BY FORCE AND SIEGE AND UNDER CONQUEST BY
THE BRITISH WHO WON THE WAR OF 1812 AND WON THE CIVIL WAR OF 1860.
YES, I KNOW THIS IS NOT WHAT YOU LEARNED ABOUT OUR HISTORY IN OUR . . .
“PUBLIC SKOOL SYSTEM.”
“THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS” CHANGED THE . . . “LEGAL
STATUS” . . . AND . . . “LEGAL STANDING” . . . OF
THE PEOPLE FROM . . . “ELECTORS” . . . AND CHANGED THEM INTO . . .
“REGISTERED VOTERS” . . . WHO WERE THEN TRICKED INTO ACCEPTING AND
AMENDING . . . NEW CONSTITUTIONS WHICH WERE FORCED ON THEM . . . JUST LIKE THE
ELECTORAL COLLEGES FORCE ANY CANDIDATE OF THEIR CHOICE TO . . . SUPERCEDE ANY
CANDIDATE . . . THE DISENFRANCHISED . . . REGISTERED VOTERS . . . WOULD TRY TO
VOTE IN!!!!
“These authorities establish the
position, that constitutions take effect and become binding from the time of
their ratification by the vote of the people; which, in the language of
Washington, is of itself “an explicit and authentic act of the whole
people. . . . When it is necessary to ascertain the will of the people, the
legislature must provide the means of ascertaining it. The Constitution
of the United States was established in this way. It was recommended to
the States to send delegates to a convention. They did so. Then it
was recommended that the States should ascertain the will of the people.
Nobody suggested any other mode. The opposite counsel have cited the
examples of the different States in which constitutions have been
altered. Only two provided for conventions, and yet conventions have been
held in many of them. But how? Always these conventions were called
together by the legislature, and no single constitution has ever been altered
by means of a convention gotten up by mass meetings. There must be an
authentic mode of ascertaining the public will somehow and somewhere. If
not, it is a government of the strongest and most numerous. . . . The boasted
power of majorities can only show itself under the law, and not against the
law, in any government of laws. It can only act upon days and in places
appointed by law. But it is urged by the opposite counsel, that the great
doctrine of the sovereignty of the people, and their consequent power to alter
the constitution whenever they choose, is the American doctrine, in opposition
to that of the Holy Alliance of Europe, which proclaims that all reforms must
emanate from the throne.” Luther v. Borden et al., 48 U.S. 1, 24,
28, 31 (1849). And;
HOWEVER, THIS IS WHAT THE CORRUPT . . . ATTORNEYS . . . WHO WERE MEMBERS
OF THE FORMER SEATTLE BAR ASSOCIATION DID IN VIOLATION OF LUTHOR v. BORDEN,
SUPRA.
THE SAME THING WAS DONE ILLEGALLY IN . . . ALL 50 STATES!!!!
United States v. Mindru Yasui, 48 F.supp. 40, which says at head note 9,
see more at West Key 31;
“The doctrine that there can be a
"partial martial law" unproclaimed and unregulated except by rule of
a military commander, expressed in order, or regulation proclaimed by him and
enforced in the civil courts in a territory within the continental limits of
the United States and at the same time not occupied by any foreign foe, cannot
be justified by any theory of constitutional or military law, and its only
justification lies in Siege.” United States v. Mindru Yasui, 48
F.Supp. 40 at head note 9; see more at West Key 31.
VOLUME 38 OF THE REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON WHICH IS ENTITLED . . . MILITIA AND
MILITARY AFFAIRS . . . CLEARLY SHOWS THAT . . . EVERY AGENCY . . . AND .
. .EVERY DEPARTMENT . . . OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IS UNDER THE DIRECT
CONTROL AND SUPERVISION OF . . . THE MILITARY . . . AGAIN IN VIOLATION OF
. . . LUTHOR v. BORDEN, SUPRA, WHICH READS IN PART:
“The fact that both parties claim the right to the
government cannot alter the case, for both cannot be entitled to it. If
there is an armed conflict, like the one we are speaking, it is a case of
domestic violence, and one of the parties must be in insurrection of the lawful
government. ...Unquestionably a military government, established as the
permanent government of the State, would not be a republican government, and it
would be the duty of Congress to overthrow it. . . . “martial law,”
as here attempted and as once practised in England against her own people, has
been expressly forbidden there for near two centuries, as well as by the
principles of every other free constitutional government. ( 1
Hallam’s Const. Hist., 420.)” Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S.
1, 43 (1849). And;
THE 1878 WALLA WALLA CONSTITUTION WAS PROPERLY ESTABLISHED BY THE PEOPLE AS
REQUIRED BY LAW UNLIKE THE MASS MEETING OF JULY 1889
The Revised Code of Washington at RCW 9A.04.110(24) DEFINES THE VOLUME 0
CORPORATE CHARTER CONSTITUTION AS A MERE RCW STATUTE!
“RCW 9A.04.110 Definitions.
(24) “Statute means the
Constitution or an act of the legislature or initiative or referendum of this
state.” And;
ALL 50 . . . FEDERAL STATES . . . OR ALL 50 . . . CORPORATE STATES . . .
TODAY IN 2009 HAVE A SIMILAR PROVISION THAT MAKES IT CLEAR YOUR SO CALLED . . .
“STATE CONSTITUTION” . . . IS MERELY A . . .
“STATUTE”!!!!
THIS IS WHY YOU WILL FIND YOUR SO CALLED . . . “STATE CONSTITUTION”
. . . IN YOUR . . . “STATE” . . . “STATUTE BOOKS.”
YOUR STATE CONSTITUTION IS MERELY A STATUTE!!!!
ALL NINE MEN OF THE WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT IN A UNAMINOUS EN BANC
DECISION VERY CLEARLY STATED THAT RCW STATUTES ARE NOT THE LAW:
“But the legislature specifically disclaimed any
intention to change the meaning of any statute. The compilers of the Code
were not empowered by Congress to amend existing law, and doubtless had no
thought of doing so ...” Warner v. Goltra, 293 U.S. 155, 161, 79 L.
Ed. 254, 55 S. Ct. 46.
...The act before us does not purport to
amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation entitled
“Revised Code of Washington,” which is not the law. Such an
act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation leaves
the law unchanged. En Banc.” PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.(2d) 409, 411,
412, 413, 415, 421 (Dec.22, 1960).
If the . . . “RCW STATUTES” . . . “ARE NOT THE LAW” . .
. DOES ANY WASHINGTON JUDGE VIOLATE ANY LAWS WHEN HE BREAKS HIS . . .
“RCW STATUTORY OATH OF OFFICE”????
THE ATTORNEYS SUBVERTED OUR ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONS AT THE END OF THE CIVIL WAR
IN COMPLIANCE WITH . . . “THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS.”
WE ARE NOW UNDER THE RULE OF MAN AND NOT THE RULE OF LAW.
THE JUDGES HAVE CREATED A LITERAL ALICE IN WONDERLAND FANTASY AND TH LAW IS THE
WORDS THAT COME OUT OF THEIR MOUTHS AND THEY MAKE IT UP FROM THE BENCH.
YOUR MOTION BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION IS DENIED, THE CONSTITUTION IS SUPERCEDED
BY THE SPECIFIC STATUTE DRUNK DRIVING, SPEEDING OR RUNNING A RED LIGHT THEY
SAY!!!!
YOUR MOTION BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION IS DENIED, THE COURT RULES SUPERCEDE THE
CONSTITUTION.
IF YOU DON’T LIKE MY DECISION, YOU CAN TAKE IT UP ON APPEAL!!!!
WHICH CONSTITUTION or Constitution did you cite in your legal pleading or
motion????
Did you obtain a CERTIFIED COPY of the 1st Original Dejure Constitution from
your ARCHIVES and have them put the SEAL OF THE STATE on it and did you file it
in your case yet????
WATCH WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DO THAT!!!!
THE FIFTH ARTICLE OF . . . “THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS” . . . ORDERED
ALL THE “States” in original jurisdiction to put . . . “NEW
CONSTITUTIONS” . . . for the . . . “NEW STATES” . . .
in . . . “THE NEW UNION” . . . into effect at the end of the Civil
War.
THIS WAS 100% ILLEGAL!!!!
“Whether a Constitution shall be
amended is a “political question,” but whether it has been legally
amended is a “judicial question.” McConaughy v. Secretary of
State, 119 N.W. 408, 413, 106 Minn. 392 Words and Phrases
“Political Question” And;
“Courts are not deprived of the
right to pass upon constitutionality of an amendment to an existing
constitution on ground that question is “political question” over
which courts have no control, since question of validity of the adoption of an
amendment to constitution is a “judicial” and not a
“political question”. Graham v. Jones, 3 So.2d 761, 767, 198
La.507 Words and Phrases” “Political Question” And;
The 1st Original Dejure Constitution for every State in . . . “THE OLD
UNION” . . .has been . . . “SUSPENDED” . . . and placed
into . . . “THE ARCHIVES DIVISION” . . . of the office of . . .
“THE SECRETARY OF STATE” . . . in every new . . . “CORPORATE
STATE”!!!!
Some STATES like . . . MICHIGAN . . . and . . . ARKANSAS . . . have up to SIX
(6) CONSTITUTIONS!!!!
However, every State or STATE has it’s own . . .
“Constitution” . . . or . . . “CONSTITUTION” and
every State or STATE has it’s own GOVERNMENT.
ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE WRONG . . . STATE CONSTITUTIONS!!!!
THE ORIGINAL U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED!!!!
THE ORIGINAL U.S. CONSTITUTION IS CURRENTLY BEING HELD IN . . . CUSTODY .
. . OF . . . “THE NATIONAL MILITARY ARCHIVES” . . . AS
HAS BEEN THEIR EVER SINCE IT WAS FIRST CAPTURED WHEN MARTIAL LAW WAS DECLARED
IN 1860.
THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS NEVER BEEN AMENDED TO GO PAST THE TWELFTH
AMENDMENT!!!!
THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION DOES NOT HAVE A 13th, 14th, 15th . . . OR . . .
SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT ON IT!!!!
THAT’S RIGHT, . . . THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION . . . THAT IS BEING
HELD . . . IN CUSTODY . . . BY . . . “THE NATIONAL MILITARY
ARCHIVES” . . . DOES NOT HAVE . . . “A SIXTEENTH
AMENDMENT” . . . ON IT!!!!
ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE WRONG . . . U.S. CONSTITUTION!!!!
ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE 1871 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION!!!!
They have tricked . . . ALL OF YOU . . . into using the 1871 DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION that was Enacted February 21st, 1871, Section 34 of the
Acts of the 41st Congress, section III, chapter 61 & 62 An Act to provide a
Government for the District of Columbia 16 Stat section 419 of the Statutes at
Large which is really the 1871 District of Columbia Constitution for the
[c]itizens of the District of Columbia . . . and . . . THE TERRITORIES .
. . and . . . THE POSSESSIONS!!!!
That is the [constitution] they put in all our . . . STATE STATUTE BOOKS . . .
and tricked you into believing that is the . . . U.S. CONSTITUTION.
That is the same [constitution] that they put in your . . . CITIZENS HANDBOOK
POCKET CONSTITUTION . . . to throw you off track!!!!
You should be using the VALID . . . “U.S. Constitution” . . . that
was produced by the Constitutional Convention which produced the 1787
Constitution for the United States and was approved by the 9th State in 1789
and then Congress agreed to add a Bill of Rights in 1791 . .. . that is being
held in . . . CUSTODY . . . by . . . “THE NATIONAL MILITARY
ARCHIVES” . . . in . . . WASHINGTON D.C. under a glass seal and
guarded by a black booted thug with an AK 47.
NO BAR CARD ATTORNEY . . . HAS EVER CITED THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION IN ANY COURT
IN ANY OF THE 50 STATES ANYWHERE IN AMERICA!!!!!
THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION . . . DOES NOT HAVE . . . A SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT ON
IT!!!!
Sorry folks, but the current . . . STATUTES . . . shows that . . .
YOUR RIGHTS ARE COMPLETELY . . . “SUBROGATED” . . . TO . . . THE
UNITED STATES!!!!
Sorry, I can’t give these . . . STATUTES . . . showing you that all . . .
YOUR RIGHTS . . . are completely . . . “SUBROGATED” . . . to
the corporate . . . UNITED STATES . . . until my seminars next year or maybe
2012!!!!
NONE OF YOU OUT THERE HAVE THE PROPER LEGAL STATUS OR STANDING TO CHALLENGE
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES AT THIS TIME!!!!
SORRY, YOU WILL HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL MY SEMINARS NEXT YEAR OR 2012 TO FIND OUT
HOW TO OVERCOME THIS PROBLEM.
UNTIL YOU CHANGE YOUR STATUS, CHARACTER AND STANDING, YOU CANNOT CHALLENGE THE
IRS PERIOD!!!!
ALL YOUR RIGHTS ARE . . . “SUBROGATED” TO THE UNITED STATES
PERIOD!!!!
Sorry, you will have to wait until my seminars next year or 2012!
* * *
I will be teaching this in SEMINARS next year or 2012 to perfect your status to
give you standing that you cannot claim now in the . . . “first
seminar.”
Then I will be teaching a . . . “2nd SEMINAR” after that next year
or 2012 some time to force the IRS to admit you qualify and show you how to
force the IRS to change their records to reflect that you are now a . . .
“NON-TAX PAYER.”
* * *
SO WHAT IS THE NUMBER 1 BEST WAY TO DETECT IF YOU MIGHT BE LEARNING TAX LAW
FROM AN UNDERCOVER IRS SNOOP OR GOVERNMENT AGENT????
ANSWER: ANY PERSON OR GROUP THAT DISTRIBUTES OR SELLS . . . “STOP
WITHHOLDING FORMS” . . . to give to your . . . “EMPLOYER” . .
. instructing him or her to . . . “STOP WITHHOLDING TAXES” . . .
from your . . . PAYCHECK!
QUESTION: Why is that????
FIRST ANSWER: BECAUSE THEY ALL KNOW THAT IN ABOUT 4 TO 5 TO 6 YEARS LATER THAT
THE IRS IS GOING TO SEND YOUR EMPLOYER A LETTER TELLING YOUR EMPLOYER TO IGNORE
AND NOT HONOR ANY MORE OF YOUR STOP WITHHOLDING PAPERWORK AND INSTRUCT YOUR
EMPLOYER TO WITHHOLD AT ZERO OR AT THE HIGHEST AMOUNT POSSIBLE.
SECOND ANSWER: BECAUSE THEY ALL KNOW THAT ABOUT 4 TO 5 TO 6 YEARS LATER THAT
THE IRS IS GOING TO SEND YOUR EMPLOYER A NOTICE OF LEVY AND/OR A GARNISHMENT OF
YOUR WAGES INSTRUCTING YOUR EMPLOYER TO GARNISH YOUR WAGES (THE FULL $20,000.00
TO $30,000.00) FOR THE LAST 4 TO 5 TO 6 YEARS OF TAXES THAT YOU DID NOT PAY.
THIRD ANSWER: BECAUSE THEY ALL KNOW THAT THEIR STOP WITHHOLDING FORMS WILL GET
YOU IN TROUBLE 4 TO 5 TO 6 YEARS LATER!!!!
FOURTH ANSWER: NONE OF THEM HAVE ANY PAPERWORK TO STOP YOU FROM BEING SUMMONED
IN TO AN IRS AUDIT, AND NONE OF THEM HAS ANY PAPERWORK TO STOP THE IRS FROM
PLACING A LIEN OR LEVY OR NOTICE OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN AGAINST YOUR NAME AND REAL
PROPERTY AT THE COUNTY RECORDER’S OFFICE OR ON YOUR CREDIT REPORT AND
NONE OF THEM HAVE ANY PAPERWORK TO STOP THE EMPLOYER FROM TURNING OVER YOUR
CHECK VIA GARNISHMENT AND NONE OF THEM HAVE ANY PAPERWORK TO STOP THEM FROM
TAKING YOUR MONEY OUT OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND NONE OF THEM HAVE ANY PAPERWORK
TO STOP YOU FROM BEING CHARGED CRIMINALLY WITH EITHER INCOME TAX EVASION OR
WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE INCOME TAX RETURNS.
.
FIFTH ANSWER: PEYMON MOTTTADAH OF FREEDOM LAW SCHOOL, STEVEN HEMPLING OF THE
FREEDOM ENTERPRISE SOCIETY, BOB SCHULTZ OF WE THE PEOPLE AND FORMER CHUCK CONCES
OF THE LAWMAN GROUPS ALL HAVE BEEN AROUND 10 TO 20 PLUS YEARS AND TO DATE THEY
STILL OFFER TO GIVE AWAY OR SELL . . . “BOGUS STOP WITHHOLDING
FORMS” . . . WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR . . . BOGUS STOP
WITHHOLDING FORMS . . . WILL GET YOU IN VERY HOT WATER AND TROUBLE WITH THE IRS
4 TO 5 TO 6 YEARS LATER!!!!!
Similarly, a store security guard sees you put things in your pocket, but does
NOT warn you that shoplifting is illegal, no, the store security guard waits
until you actually leave the store with the stolen goods in your pocket and
then arrests and charges you with shoplifting!!!!
What’s worse about PEYMON MOTTTADAH OF FREEDOM LAW SCHOOL, STEVEN
HEMPLING OF THE FREEDOM ENTERPRISE SOCIETY, BOB SCHULTZ OF WE THE PEOPLE AND
FORMER CHUCK CONCES OF THE LAWMAN GROUPS than the . . . STORE SECURITY
GUARDS????
ANSWER: THEY ARE THE ONES WHO SOLD YOU OR GAVE YOU THE BOGUS STOP WITHHOLDING
FORMS THAT GOT YOU INTO TROUBLE WITH THE IRS IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!
SURE, I COULD BE WRONG, BUT I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT AS I HAVE NEVER BEEN WRONG
ABOUT ANY SO CALLED PATRIOT GURU OR INCOME TAX GURU FOR 12 PLUS YEARS AND WHO
KNOWS, MAYBE THESE PATRIOTS AND TAX GURUS REALLY ARE JUST HARD CORE
PATRIOTS . . . WHO HAVE GOOD INTENTIONS, . . . “BUT WHAT WAS THE
ROAD TO HELL PAVED WITH????
QUESTION: WHAT’S THE NEXT BEST WAY TO SPOT AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT OR
SOMEONE WHO IS LEGALLY INCOMPETENT AND HAS NO BUSINESS GIVING LEGAL ADVICE OR
TEACHING TAX SEMINARS?????
ANSWER: ANYONE WHO FALSELY CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401 (c) . .
. “DEFINITION OF WAGES” . . . DOES NOT APPLY TO ANYONE WHO WORKS IN
. . . “THE PRIVATE SECTOR” . . . AND ANYONE WHO FALSELY
CLAIMS THAT . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401 (c) . . . ONLY APPLIES TO EMPLOYEES OF
THE STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!!!!
QUESTION: WHY IS THAT????
ANSWER: BECAUSE THEY ALL FAIL TO MENTION THE TWO (2) TERMS THAT ARE CLEARLY . .
. “INCLUDED” . . . IN THE DEFINITION OF . . .
“EMPLOYEE” . . . PROVIDED BY . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401 (c) . . .
“POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF” . . . and . . . “OR . .
. ANY AGENCY OR . . . “INSTRUMENTALITY” . . . OF ANYONE OR
MORE OF THE FOREGOING” . . .which clearly show that any business or
corporation that was issued a . . . “MASTERS BUSINESS LICENSE” . .
. to do business in this state or within this state like BASKIN ROBBINS,
TACO BELL, MCDONALDS, BURGER KING, SAFEWAY, ALBERTSONS, QFC, SHELL GAS STATION,
76 GAS STATION, 7-11, BON MACY’S, J.C. PENNEYS, SEARS . . . ARE ALL
. . . UNITED STATES CORPORATIONS . . . WHO ALL HAVE A . . .
FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER . . . AND ALL OF THOSE CORPORATIONS ARE IN FACT AND LAW .
. . POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS . . . and . . . INSTRUMENTALITIES . . . OF THE
STATE!!!!
IF YOU ARE AN . . . EMPLOYEE . . . OF . . . STARBUCKS COFFEE . . . OR . .
. MCDONALD’S . . . YOU ARE CLEARLY AN . . . “EMPLOYEE”
. . . AS CLEARLY DEFINED BY . . . 26 U.S.C. 3401 (c).
WHY DID ALL THE BIG TAX GURUS GLOSS OVER THAT STATUTE SO QUICKLY????
ANYBODY WHO TELLS YOU OTHERWISE IS CLEARLY AN . . . UNDER COVER IRS AGENT . . .
or . . . GROSSLY INCOMPETENT . . . AND THAT PERSON HAS NO BUSINESS GIVING LEGAL
ADVICE OR TEACHING SEMINARS ON FEDERAL TAXATION PERIOD!!!!
Whether . . . ALL . . . THE TAX GURUS . . . are in fact . . . UNDERCOVER
IRS AGENTS DIRECTLY ON THE GOVERNMENT PAYROLL . . . or . . .
whether they are just good old boys who are just . . . HARD CORE PATRIOTS
WITH GOOD INTENTIONS DOES NOT MATTER WHEN THE END RESULTS IS THE SAME AND YOU
GET CHARGED WITH A CRIME AND FINED $5,000.00 DOES NOT MATTER DOES IT????
IS THAT . . . FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY????
IS THAT . . . FUNNY????
REALLY WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE, when it is you get charged with
INCOME TAX EVASION or if you get charged with WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE INCOME
TAX RETURNS because you used their . . . FRAUDULENT STOP WITHHOLDING FORMS, WHO
GOES TO JAIL YOU OR THEM????
THEY MIGHT AS WELL BE DIRECTLY ON THE GOVERNMENT PAYROLL!!!!!
WHAT DAMN BIT OF DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE WHEN YOU ARE THE 1 WHO GETS CHARGED
WITH A CRIME AND YOU ARE THE 1 WHO GOES TO PRISON FOR USING THEIR . . .
“FRAUDULENT STOP WITHHOLDING FORMS”????
ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO PUTS OUT DISTRIBUTES, GIVES AWAY OR SELLS . . .
“STOP WITHHOLDING FORMS” . . . IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS
AGENT!!!!
ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO PUTS . . . “LEGAL DISCLAIMERS” . . . ON
THEIR PAPERWORK IS PROBABLY AN UNDERCOVER IRS AGENT!!!!
Bottom line is that these people HAVE NO BUSINESS GIVING OTHERS LEGAL
ADVICE!!!!
IT DOES NOT MATTER THAT THEY HAD . . . GOOD INTENTIONS . . . WHEN THE END
RESULT IS THAT . . . YOU ARE THE 1 WHO GETS A NOTICE OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN FILED
AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY . . . AND . . . YOUR MONEY . . . TAKEN OUT OF YOUR
BANK ACCOUNT . . . AND . . . YOUR PAYCHECKS GARNISHED!!!!
It’s because of . . .LEGAL LUNATICS . . . and . . . PAYTRIOT WACKOS . .
. like those that I have mentioned that we are stuck with . . . BAR
ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS . . . and their criminally corrupt . . . STATE BAR
ASSOCIATIONS . . . to start with!!!!
ANOTHER SURE FIRE WAY TO TELL WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE DEALING WITH A PAYTRIOT
FOR PROFIT, PATRIDIOT OR SCAMMER IS TO INSPECT THEIR PAPERWORK AND SEMINAR
ADVERTISEMENTS AND LOOK FOR ANY . . . LEGAL DISCLAIMERS!!!!!
ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO PUTS LEGAL DISCLAIMERS ON THEIR PAPERWORKS AND SEMINAR
ADVERTISEMENTS IS MOST LIKELY A CON MAN, CON WOMAN, SCAMMER,
PATRIDIOT AND PAYTRIOT FOR PROFIT!!!!
BEWARE OF LEGAL DISCLAIMERS THAT SAY IN THEIR PAPERWORKS OR SEMINAR
ADVERTISEMENTS IS . . . .”NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE”. OR
. . . “FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY”!!!!!
* * *
QUESTION: IS IT FUNNY WHEN YOU GET HIT WITH A $5,000.00 FRIVOLOUS FILING
FEE??????????????
QUESTION: IS IT FUNNY WHEN YOU ARE THE 1 WHO GETS SENT TO
JAIL????????????????????
* * *
THE “INCOMPETENT PATRIDIOTS” AND “PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT
SCAMMERS” PUT . . . “LEGAL DISCLAIMERS” . . . ON THEIR ADVERTISEMENTS
BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE WHEN YOU LOSE AND GO TO JAIL!!!!!
THE “CON MEN” AND “CON WOMEN” PUT . . . “LEGAL
DISCLAIMERS” . . . ON THEIR PAPER-WORKS AND SEMINAR ADVERTISEMENTS
BECAUSE THEY DON’T WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE WHEN YOU GET HIT WITH A
$5,000.00 FRIVOLOUS FILING FEE BY THE IRS!!!!
THE “CON MEN” AND “CON WOMEN” PUT . . . “LEGAL
DISCLAIMERS” . . . ON THEIR PAPER-WORKS AND SEMINAR ADVERTISEMENTS
BECAUSE THEY DON’T WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE WHEN YOU GET ADDITIONAL
CRIMINAL CHARGES FILED AGAINST YOU!!!!!
I do NOT put . . . “LEGAL DISCLAIMERS” . . . on any of my paperwork
or seminar advertisement’s!!!!
Every time I help a client, I put my own butt on the line and expose myself to
future charges of UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW because I WIN SO MANY CASES,
THAT I AM A THREAT TO THE ENTIRE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION!!!!!
NONE of the SCAMMERS I have named above have ever been charged with
UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW to the best of my knowledge and the main reason
for that is because NONE OF THEM ARE WINNING ANY CASES and therefore NONE OF
THEM ARE ANY THREAT TO THE COURT SYSTEM!!!!!
In FACT the COURT SYSTEM LOVES these SCAMMERS that I have named above because
they are bring so many more sheople to the slaughter and make it ten times if
NOT a hundred times easier to convict them and send them to jail that much
sooner!!!!
FOR A MORE . . . COMPLETE LIST . . . of . . . “PATRIOT WACKOS” . .
. “LEGAL LUNATICS,” . . . “PATRIDIOTS,” . .
. “PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT,” . . . “JEWISH INFILTRATORS,”
. . . “JEWISH DISINFORMATION SPECIALIST’S,” . . .
and other who are just simply . . . “LEGALLY INCOMPETENT
MORONS,” . . . please go to GOOGLE and type in . . .
“QUATLOOS” . . . and then go back to “GOOGLE” and type
in the term . . . “MILITIA WATCHDOG”!!!!
You won’t see MY NAME on either . . . “QUATLOOS” . .
. or on . . . .”THE MILITIA WATCHDOG”!!!!
QUESTION: Why is that????
ANSWER: Because I promote and use only . . . “LEGITIMATE & VALID
LEGAL ARGUMENTS” . . . in all my legal writings and have real and
valid . . . COURT CASE NUMBERS . . . to prove that I WIN a majority of all my
cases PRE-TRIAL . . . that are . . . “DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.”!!!!!
TIPS ON HOW TO SPOT PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT AND PATRIDIOTS: They are using
“tickle words” that all you patriots need and love to hear, i.e.,
put down attorneys, talk about the corrupt federal reserve and the evil
IRS, read a few BLACK LAW DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS to make you think that they
know something which convinces you to believe that they are legal wizards of oz
who are really the stupid little guy behind the curtain who is NOT “all
knowing” and generally by getting to your emotions to use you as their
sounding board. They pretend to serve their Country and talk about Amerika
instead of America and in fact, they are just another PAYTRIOT FOR PROFIT ICON
who has NEVER WON ANY CRIMINAL CASE OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE that thinks they
deserve to be worshipped but in fact, the only person they serve is their
little self. Their Kingdom is a kingdom of darkness based on lies and
manipulations. They control your emotions, use you and once they finished with
you, they dump you and even sometimes they even go as far as defaming and
attacking your name if they think that might raise themselves up to the eyes of
others, their followers/ fools/disciples/worshipers. If ever I
disappear, it will have been those who call themselves THE JEW but who are NOT
THE JEW or THE JESUITS in BLACK ROBES OF TREASON that you all call JUDGES who
did it. I will not back off of telling the truth for fear of death. No
way, over my dead body. Truth is more important than my very life on this evil
planet.
BEWARE OF THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES THE JEW BUT WHO ARE NOT THE JEW, BUT ARE
FROM THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN.
SEE REVELATIONS 2:9 which reads:
“I know thy works and tribulation, and poverty (but thou art rich) and I
know the blasphemy of them, which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the
Synagogue of Satan.” Revelations 2:9
SEE REVELATIONS 3:9 which reads:
“Behold, I will make them of the Synagogue of Satan, which call
themselves Jews, and are not, but do lie: behold, I say, I will make them
that they shall come and worship before thy feet, and shall know that I have
loved thee.” Revelations 3:9
* * *
MOST ALL OF THESE SO CALLED . . . TAX GURUS . . . AND . . . FEDERAL TAX
ATTORNEYS, PATRIDIOTS, PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT AND UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT
AGENTS, IRS SNOOPS AND JEWISH DISINFORMATION SPECIALIST'S HAVE DRIVERS LICENSE,
PAY THEIR TAXES AND MOST IMPORTANTLY HAVE NEVER WON ANY SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASE
OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE!!!!!
Go ahead and ask your . . . TAX GURU . . . or . . . BAR ATTORNEY: . . .
“DO YOU HAVE A DRIVERS LICENSE”?????
COMMON SENSE SHOULD TELL YOU IF THESE BIG TAX GURUS DON’T HAVE THE LEGAL
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE TO BEAT A SIMPLE TRAFFIC TICKET FOR DRIVING WITHOUT A
DRIVERS LICENSE, YOU SHOULD NOT TRUST THEM WITH SOMETHING BIGGER LIKE THE 800
POUND GORILLA CALLED THE IRS!!!!
Go ahead and ask your . . . TAX GURU . . . or . . . BAR ATTORNEY: . . . .
“DO YOU FILE INCOME TAX RETURNS”????
COMMON SENSE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT IF ALL THESE . . . TAX GURUS . . . and . . .
BAR ATTORNEYS . . . FILE THEIR INCOME TAX RETURNS . . . THAT THEY HAVE NO
CONFIDENCE IN THEIR OWN LEGAL SKILLS TO NOT FILE INCOME TAX RETURNS THEMSELVES
FOR FEAR OF BEING PROSECUTED FOR EITHER . . . WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE
INCOME TAX RETURNS . . . or . . . INCOME TAX EVASION!!!!
Go ahead and ask your GURU: . . . “DO YOU PAY TAXES TO THE IRS”????
COMMON SENSE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT IF ALL THESE . . . TAX GURUS . . . and . . .
BAR ATTORNEYS . . . PAY THEIR FEDERAL INCOME TAXES . . . THAT THEY HAVE NO
CONFIDENCE IN THEIR OWN LEGAL SKILLS TO FIND ANY EXEMPTION THAT WOULD ALLOW
THEM TO . . . NOT PAY FEDERAL INCOME TAXES . . . FOR FEAR OF BEING PROSECUTED
FOR EITHER . . . WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE INCOME TAX RETURNS . . .
or . . . INCOME TAX EVASION!!!!
Go ahead and ask your . . .TAX GURU . . . or . . . BAR ATTORNEY: . . .
“CAN YOU PROVIDE US WITH 1, 2 or 3 COURT CASE NUMBERS:
___________________________________TO PROVE TO ALL OF US THAT YOU HAVE EVER WON
EVEN JUST ONE (1) SINGLE CASE IN ANY COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION IN ANY
STATE OR FEDERAL CIRCUIT WHERE THE COURT RULED THAT YOU OR YOUR CLIENT
WERE IN FACT AND LAW . . . NOT REQUIRED TO FILE INCOME TAX RETURNS . . . AND/OR
. . . THAT THERE WERE . . . NOT REQUIRED TO PAY FEDERAL INCOME TAXES . . .
BECAUSE THEY . . . QUALIFIED . . . AS A . . . NON-TAX PAYER????
Watch . . . ALL . . . of them make . . . EXCUSES!!!!
IF YOU THINK THAT THE PERSON OR GROUP YOU MIGHT BE DEALING WITH IS A SCAM YOU
MIGHT WANT TO THINK TWICE ABOUT HAVING ME REVIEW ANY OF THEIR PAPERWORK TO MAKE
SURE THAT YOU DO NOT GET IN WORSE TROUBLE THAN YOU ARE NOW!!!!
I have NOT had a DRIVERS LICENSE since December 8, 1996!!!!
I have NOT had a STATE ISSUED ID CARD since 1998!!!!
I have NOT filed an INCOME TAX RETURN since 1989!!!!
Those last few years that I didn’t file clearly show that I was legally
and lawfully entitled to . . . A LEGITIMATE REFUND OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS!!!!
However, I simply allowed them at that time to illegally impose an unverified
illegal and bogus assessment and just let . . . THE SIX (6) YEAR STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS RUN IT’S COURSE AND NOW THEY CAN NEVER COLLECT!!!!
I AM NOW 100% COMPLETELY OFF THE GRID!!!!
I do NOT conduct any business . . . “in this State” . . . or . .
. “within this State.”
I HAVE NO MINIMAL CONTACTS OR CONTRACTS WITH . . . “THE DISTRICT STATE OF
WASHINGTON.”
I AM 100% COMPLETELY OUT OF THE SYSTEM!!!!
THERE ARE NO W-2's, NO W-4's, NO 1099's and NO BANK ACCOUNT attached to my name
and former Social Security number since 1989!!!!
THE IRS AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CAN SEARCH UNTIL THE END OF TIME FOR
PROOF OF MY INCOME AND THEY WON’T FIND ANY, BECAUSE THERE ISN’T
ANY!!!!
I OWN NOTHING!!!!
GOD OWNS EVERYTHING!!!!
I DO NOT KEEP BOOKS OR RECORDS OR RECEIPTS, NEVER HAVE AND NEVER WILL!!!!
NEVER MIND THE TRUTH THAT NONE OF THESE CLOWNS AND SCREWBALLS MENTIONED ABOVE
HAVE NEVER WON EVEN JUST 1 SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASE OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE, LET'S
JUST ALL GET MAD AT LUIS EWING FOR TELLING YOU THE TRUTH, BECAUSE NOW YOU CAN'T
MAKE ANY MONEY PROMOTING ANY OF THESE TRUTH ATTACK, TEA PARTIERS OR
CONTINENTAL CONGRESS PAYTRIOT FOR PROFIT SCAMMERS WHO HAVE NEVER WON ANY MAJOR
INCOME TAX CASE FOR 12 TO 20 YEARS PLUS NOW!!!!
“Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the
truth?” Galations 4:16
IT'S TIME TO THROW OUT ALL THE OLD PATRIOT LEADER BABY’S WITH THE BATH
WATER!!!!
IT’S TIME TO THROW OUT ALL THE OLD TAX ATTORNEY LEADER BABY’S WITH
THE BATH WATER!!!!
OUT WITH THE OLD AND IN WITH THE NEW!!!!
“Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of
thorns? or figs of thistles?” Mathew 7:16
Mostly EVERYBODY who has used any of those . . . SCAMMERS STOP WITHHOLDING
FORMS OR W-4 EXEMPT CRAP . . . have . . . ALL LOST MOST IF NOT ALL . . . of
their cases????
“ So every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and a corrupt tree
bringeth forth evil fruit.” Mathew 7:17
MY LAUNDRY LIST OF TESTIMONIALS PROVES THAT I PROMOTE ONLY VALID AND LEGITIMATE
LEGAL INFORMATION . . . “THAT WORKS.”
“A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree
bring forth good fruit.” Mathew 7:18
I PROVE THAT I WIN CASES, WHEREAS ALL OF THE CON MEN AND CON WOMEN THAT I HAVE
NAMED ABOVE CAN’T PRODUCE ANY WINS OF ANY IMPORTANCE????
“For if the first fruits be holy, so is the whole lump: and if the root
be holy, so are the branches.” Romans 11:16
I will provide my LAUNDRY LIST OF TESTIMONIALS and WINS to anyone who sends me
an e-mail asking for them!
Mostly EVERYBODY that uses ALL the above mentioned SCAMMERS & PAYTRIOTS FOR
PROFIT PAPERWORKS end up NOT only LOSING ALL THEIR CASES, but many have also
ended up with additional civil fines of $500.00 FRIVOLOUS FILING FEES which
have now been upped to $5,000.00 FRIVOLOUS FILING FEES????
“Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, is hewn down, and cast
into the fire.” Mathew 7:19
THE BIBLE SAYS TO PUT DOWN EVIL WHEREVER WE SEE IT, SO WE SHOULD NOT FOLLOW ANY
OF THOSE SCAMMERS AND PATRIDIOTS ANY LONGER!!!!
“Therefore by their fruit ye shall know them.” Mathew 7:20
WHY IS IT THAT EVERYONE WHO USES THOSE SCAMMERS PAPERWORKS ALL LOSE THEIR
CASES????
“Either make the tree good, and his fruit good: or else make the tree
evil, and his fruit evil: for the tree is known by the fruit.”
Mathew 12:33
THE BIBLE ALSO SAYS TO WATCH FOR THOSE WHO TALK GOOD LIKE VICTORIA JOY AND
SAYS:
“O generation of vipers, how can you speak good things, when ye are
evil? For the abundance of heart the mouth speaketh.” Mathew
12:34
“A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth good
things: and an evil man out of an evil treasure, bringeth forth evil
things.” Mathew 12:35
I CAN SHOW YOU HOW TO USE THE CHAPTERS AND VERSES OUT OF THE BIBLE IN HARMONY
WITH “THE RULE OF LAW” AND NOT MANS FALSE INTERPRETATION OF THE LAW
TO WIN YOUR CASES!
“Then answered he, and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed, is
the son of man.” Mathew 13:37
I CAN SEND A LAUNDRY LIST OF TESTIMONIALS WITH NAMES, PHONE NUMBERS, THE NAMES
OF COURTS AND THE REAL COURT CASE NUMBERS OF PROVEN WINS THAT WERE DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE IN FAVOR OF MY CLIENTS!!!!
“So shall it be at the end of the world. The Angels shall go forth,
and sever the bad from among the just.” Mathew 13:49
“And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and
gnashing of teeth.” Mathew 13:50
“O hypocrites, Isaiah prophesied well of you, saying,” Mathew 15:7
WATCH OUT FOR GOOD TALKERS LIKE MOTHER VICTORIA JOY WHO USES THE LORDS NAME IN
VAIN AND BABBLES SCRIPTURES AND PRAYERS AND BLESSINGS AT HER LEGAL SEMINARS:
“Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord
will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain.”
Deuteronomy 4:34
THE BIBLE SAYS YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE A SHOW OF PRAYING:
“And when thou prayest, be not as the hypocrites: for they love to stand
and pray in the Synagogues, and in the corners of the streets, because they
would be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, they have their
reward.” Mathew 6:5
THE BIBLE SAYS YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO PRAY IN SECRET IN YOUR BEDROOM CHAMBERS OR
IN YOUR CLOSET:
“But when thou prayest, enter into thy chambers and when thou hast shut
thy door, pray unto thy Father which is in secret, and thy Father which seeth
in secret, shall reward thee openly.” Mathew 6:6
“And when ye pray, use no vain repitition as the Heathen: for they think
to be heard for their much babbling.” Mathew 6:7
WATCH OUT FOR GOOD TALKERS LIKE MOTHER VICTORIA JOY WHO USES THE LORDS NAME IN
VAIN AND BABBLES SCRIPTURES AND PRAYERS AND BLESSINGS AT HER LEGAL SEMINARS!!!!
“This people draweth near unto me with their mouth, and honoreth me with
the lips, but their heart is far off from me.” Mathew 15:8
“But in vain they worship me, teaching for doctrines, men’s
precepts.” Mathew 15:9
“Let them alone, they be the blind leaders of the blind: and if the blind
lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” Mathew 15:14
THIS IS WHY EVERYONE LOSES WITH VICTORIA JOY BECAUSE SHE IS THE BLIND LEADING
THE BLIND!!!!
BOB SCHULTZ, THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND AND HIS SILLY . . . CONTINENTAL
CONGRESS . . . BEING COMPOSED OF . . . REGISTERED VOTERS . . . LIKEWISE . . .
HAVE NO STANDING . . . TO CONVENE . . . A REAL CONTINENTAL CONGRESS TO CHANGE
ANYTHING THAT WAS DONE BY . . . ELECTORS DURING THE TIMES OF THE TERRITORIES
WHEN WE STILL HAD 3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT, JUDICIAL DISTRICTS AND A
LAWFULLY SEATED CONGRESS!!!!
THE 1 AND ONLY REDEMPTION THAT WORKS IS . . . REDEMPTION IN JESUS CHRIST!!!!
DON GRAUN of the LEGAL EAGLES LAW STUDY GROUP in Seattle, Washington at (206)
440-1938 or <jd.cons...@juno.com>
can confirm that over 19 PEOPLE FROM WASHINGTON & CANADA ALL WENT TO JAIL
using . . . MOTHER VICTORIA JOY’S . . . .BOGUS ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE,
HONOR & DISHONOR AND NOTORIAL PROTEST’S LEGAL TECHNIQUES that she
taught at a SEMINAR in Lynwood, Washington, which were supposed to work to
ELIMINATE YOUR DEBT that you incurred WHILE WRITING CHECKS ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT
which she said was OKAY TO DO?????
“For it is not a good tree that bringeth forth evil fruit: neither an
evil tree, that bringeth forth good fruit.” Luke 6:43
“For every tree is known by his own fruits: for neither of thorns gather
men figs, nor of bushes gather they grapes.” Luke 6:44
“A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth good;
and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth evil: for
of the abundance of the hearth bringeth forth evil: for of the abundance of the
heart his mouth speaketh.” Luke 6:45
“But why call me Lord, Lord, and do not the things I speak?”
Luke 6:46
“For such false apostles are deceitful workers, and transform themselves
into the Apostles of Christ.” 2 Corinthians 11:13
“And no marvel: for Satan himself is transformed into an Angel of
light.” 2 Corinthians 11:14
“Therefore it is no great thing, though his ministers transform
themselves, as though they were the ministers of righteousness, whose end shall
be according to their works.” 2 Corinthians 11:15
“If any man among you seem religious, and refrainith not his tongue, but
deceiveth his own heart, this man’s religion is vain.”
James 1: 26
“Doth a fountain send forth at one place sweet water and
bitter?” James 3:11
“Can the fig tree, my brethren, bring forth olives, either a vine
figs? So can no fountain make both salt water and sweet? James 3:12
PLEASE ASK ALL OF THE ABOVE NAMED FALSE PROPHETS AND SCAMMERS TO PROVIDE THE
COURT CAUSE NUMBERS OF ANY SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASES THAT THEY HAVE EVER WON THAT
CAN TOUCH KURT RIGGIN AND MY . . . 166 POT PLANT PRE-TRIAL DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE MAJOR WIN IN THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO.
02-1-01835-6 PRE-TRIAL . . . “WITH A TEN FOOT POLE”????
THEY WILL ALL COME UP WITH LAME EXCUSES WHY THEY CAN’T PRODUCE ANY
DOCUMENTED WINS!!!!!
“For every man that evil doeth, hateth the light, neither cometh to
light, lest his deeds should be reproved.” John 3:20
PLEASE ASK ME TO SEND YOU MY LIST OF TESTIMONIALS!!!!
“But he that doeth truth, cometh to the light, that his deeds might be
made manifest, that they are wrought according to God.” John 3:21
If it is law, it will be found in our books. If it is not be found there,
it is not law.” Entick v. Carrington, 19 Howell’s St. Tr.,
Col. 1029, 1065-1066 (1765) (cited by Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S.516
(1884)). And;
“And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it
lawfully.” Timothy, 1:8
I can show you THE CORRECT WAY to use the Law and BELIEVE ME, it’s NOT .
. . RIGHTWAY LAW!!!! (Emphasis added).
“Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the
truth?” Galations 4:16
“That we henceforth be no more children wavering and carried about with
every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with craftiness, whereby they
lay in wait to deceive.” Ephesians 4:14
“Wherefore cast off lying and speak every man truth unto neighbor: for we
are members one of another.” Ephesians 4:25
“Let no man deceive you with vain words: for, for such things cometh the
wrath of God upon the children of disobediance.” Ephesians 5:6
“But he that doeth wrong, shall receive for the wrong that he hath done:
and there is no respect of persons.” Colossians 3:25
“We warn you, brethren, in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye
withdraw yourselves from every brother that walked inordinately, and not after
the instruction, which he received of us.” 2 Thessalonians 3:6
“For we hear, that there are some which walk among you inordinately, and
work not at all, but are busybodies.” 2 Thessalonians 3:11
“They would be doctors of the Law, and yet understand not what they
speak, neither whereof they affirm.” 1 Timothy, 1:7
BEWARE DR. JAHLIL-BILLION aka “DR. ALI”!!!!
BEWARE DR. SAM KENNEDY!!!!
BEWARE DR. JAQUES JAIKARAN
“They would be doctors of the Law, and yet understand not what they
speak, neither whereof they affirm.” 1 Timothy, 1:7
“They profess that they know God, but by works they deny him, and are abominable
and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.” Titus, 1:16
“Them that sin, rebuke openly, that the rest also may fear.” 1
Timothy 5:20
* * *
THE PROBLEM THAT EVERYONE IN . . . THE PATRIOT COMMUNITY . . . AND . . . TAX
HONESTY MOVEMENT . . . OR . . . FREEDOM MOVEMENT . . . HAS IS THAT NO ONE
KNOWS HOW TO DISCERN WHO IS GIVING OUT OR PROMOTING OR TEACHING . . . VALID
LEGAL INFORMATION . . . VERSUS . . . WHO IS PROMOTING FALSE AND ILLEGAL
LEGAL INFORMATION!!!!
WHO IS GOOD AND WHO IS BAD????
Ask the TAX GURUS for Court Case Numbers ___________ to prove a WIN or WINS!!!!
HOW DO WE SEPARATE THE BEST FROM THE REST????
Ask the TAX GURUS to provide PROOF of any DOCUMENTED WINS!!!!
HOW DO WE SEPARATE THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF????
Asking for PROOF OF DOCUMENTED WINS is the 1 and ONLY way for any of us to
determine who is putting out VALID LEGAL ADVICE as opposed to BS PATRIOT
MYTHOLOGY THAT DOES NOT WORK IN COURT!!!!!
NONE OF THE BOZOS THAT I HAVE EVER PUT DOWN NOW OR IN THE PAST HAVE EVEN BEEN
ABLE TO KEEP THEMSELVES FROM GOING TO PRISON FOR IRS VIOLATIONS!!!!
BUT I HAVE PERFECTED A SYSTEM THAT AT A MINIMUM CAN KEEP YOU FROM GOING TO
PRISON EVEN IF YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY AND DID THIS FOR 2 CLIENTS IN ANOTHER
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CASE FIVE YEARS AGO IN CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA!!!!
Sorry but you can’t get that case number until after you have hired me to
keep you from going to prison!!!!
However, that will NOT work if you stay with a . . . BAR CARD ATTORNEY!!!!
I DO NOT TRUST STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS PERIOD!!!!
CHOOSE THEM AND GO TO PRISON!!!!
CHOOSE ME AND STAY OUT OF PRISON!!!!
THOSE ARE YOUR ONLY 2 OPTIONS PERIOD!!!!
HOW DO WE TELL WHO IS THE REAL DEAL AND SEPARATE THEM FROM THE PATRIDIOTS,
PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT, JEWISH DISINFORMATION SPECIALISTS, UNDERCOVER
GOVERNMENT PROVACATEURS, IRS SNOOPS AND THE DOWN RIGHT STUPID MORONS????
ASK THE TAX GURUS FOR COURT CASE NUMBERS TO PROVE THEIR WINS!!!!
ASK THE TAX GURUS TO CITE THE LAWS THAT THEY RELY UPON TO SUPPORT THEIR LEGAL
THEORIES WOULD BE ANOTHER WAY!!!!
If it is law, it will be found in our books. If it is not be found there,
it is not law.” Entick v. Carrington, 19 Howell’s St. Tr.,
Col. 1029, 1065-1066 (1765) (cited by Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S.516
(1884)). And;
THE ONLY TAX GURUS WHO WILL SPEAK OUT AGAINST HAVING TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTED
PROOFS OF WINNING COURT CASE NUMBERS ARE THE LOSERS WHO HAVE NEVER WON A CASE
OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE!!!!!
ARE YOU TIRED OF NOT GETTING AN HONEST AND STRAIGHT ANSWER FROM ALL THE SO
CALLED . . . TAX GURUS????
Everybody says . . . “READ MORE, STUDY MORE” . . . but there
is no coherent and organized source!!!!
Is your brain “NUMB” from sorting through all “THE JIBBER
JABBER”????
* * *
BECAUSE OF MY SLAM PUT DOWN ON ALL THE SO CALLED TAX GURUS, I HAVE MADE MANY
ENEMIES IN . . . THE PATRIOT MOVEMENT . . . AND . . . TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT!!!!
Many are just simply . . . JEALOUS . . . of my . . . WINNING TRACK RECORD!!!!
Kurt Riggin at <ku...@gunsandyoga.com>
who got caught growing . . . “166 MARIJUANA PLANTS” . . . of
. . . “THE BEST PURPOSE BUD YOU EVER SMOKED IN YOUR LIFE” . .
. and was charged with . . . MULTIPLE FELONY COUNTS OF
MANUFACTURING WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE MARIJUANA CHARGES . . . HOWEVER, WE
TEAMED UP ON THAT CASE AND WE SLAM DUNK KICKED THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PROSECUTORS
BUTT AND BEAT IT . . . PRE-TRIAL . . . in the . . .
“Snohomish County Superior Court Cause No. 02-1-01835-6" . . .
and it was . . . “DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE” . . . in Kurt
Riggins’ favor!!!!
Many local promoters and law study groups are mad that I will NOT allow them to
sponsor or promote any of my SEMINARS!!!!
1st, I do NOT want to be associated with any of the other PATRIDIOTS, PAYTRIOTS
FOR PROFIT and other SCREWBALLS and patriot wackos that these local promoters
and law study groups have promoted in the past.
2nd, I am NOT going to split my MONEY with anyone when I can easily promote the
seminar myself by just booking a flight, a hotel room, a conference room
and send out an e-mail announcing the time and location and price of the
seminar myself for free.
MANY LOCAL PROMOTERS AND LAW STUDY GROUPS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES ARE PISSED
OFF AT ME?????
QUESTION: WHY IS THAT????
ANSWER: I CAUSED THEM TO LOSE MONEY THAT’S WHY!!!! This is because
most law study groups that meet once a week, or bi-weekly or once a month only
get small DONATIONS when they pass the hat, so many of these local law study
groups like to sponsor or promote an OUT OF TOWN GURU WHO COMES FROM THE MAGIC
PLACE WHERE THEY KNOW MORE THAN WE DO and they can charge $200.00 to $300.00 to
$600.00 to $1,000.00 to $3,800.00 per head or more for each person, but now
that LUIS EWING HAS EXPOSED ALL OF THEM AS BEING A FRAUD OR LEGALLY
INCOMPETENT, THE LOCAL LAW STUDY GROUP PERSON WHO RUNS THE LOCAL PATRIOT
MEETING CAN’T PROMOTE THEM AND NOW HAS LOST MONEY THANKS TO LUIS EWING,
NO WONDER SO MANY SO CALLED PATRIOT GROUPS ARE PISSED OFF AT ME.
BUT I DON’T CARE BECAUSE I AM NOT IN THIS FOR THE MONEY!!!!
I DON’T CARE IF I HURT MYSELF OR MY BUSINESS!!!!
THE BIBLE SAYS TO PUT DOWN EVIL WHEREVER I SEE IT!!!!!
I WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO NO MATTER WHO DOESN’T LIKE IT!!!!
Really . . . USE YOUR BRAINS, . . . if I was really in this just for the MONEY,
would I be spending any time . . . “BAD MOUTHING OTHERS” . . . if
what I was saying . . . WAS NOT THE TRUTH????
Wow, that’s a GREAT MARKETING STRATEGY AND SMART SALES
TECHNIQUE!!!! – ( I am being sarcastic).
Why in the hell would I want to piss everyone off so that nobody wants to do
business with ME!!!!
Does that make any sense????
If I was just in this for the MONEY, I would use a soft touch and just sweet
talk everyone and not ever ever ever say anything bad about anyone and there
would be no controversy and you would NOT see people writing back to THIS YAHOO
GROUP trying to put me down or criticize me again would you????
That makes sense right?????
SO PLEASE BE AWARE, THERE ARE MANY SCAMMERS IN THIS MOVEMENT WHO ARE
PISSED OFF AND ARE LOOKING FOR SOME WAY TO RETALIATE AND GET BACK AT ME AND 1
OF THE THINGS THEY DO IS POST FALSE COMPLAINTS ABOUT ME WITH NO NAMES,
AND NO COURT CASE NUMBERS AND NO DOCUMENTATION TO PROVE IT!!!!!
For example 300 WINS FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN and a few of
their SEMINAR PROMOTERS are mad that I EXPOSED their 300 WINS FALSE ADVERTISING
SCAM WHICH CAUSED THEM TO LOSE MONEY IN LOST ATTENDANCE AT SEVERAL OF THEIR
SILLY COMMON LAW COURT SEMINARS, so they have sent out e-mails to all
their e-mail list’s with a LINK pointing out . . . 1 FALSE
COMPLAINT . . . that was posted about me on . . . “THE RIP OFF
REPORT” . . . by 1 disgruntled DRUG DEALER who was busted for growing POT
long before he ever met me!!!!!
There is . . . “1 FALSE COMPLAINT” . . . that has been made
against me and is currently POSTED on a disreputable website known as . .
. THE RIP OFF REPORT . . . which will post anyone’s . . .
FALSE COMPLAINTS . . . with . . . NO EVIDENCE to substantiate . . . THE
FALSE COMPLAINT!
THERE ARE TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY!!!!
“Doth our Law judge a man before it hear him, and know what he hath
done?” John 7:51
FIRST, please NOTICE how the . . . LIAR . . . who filed a . . . FALSE
COMPLAINT . . . on . . . RIP OFF REPORT . . . did NOT put his NAME?????
SECOND, please NOTICE how the . . . LIAR . . . who filed a FALSE
COMPLAINT on . . . RIP OFF REPORT . . . did NOT put his COURT CASE NUMBER
__________________?????
QUESTION: WHY IS THAT????
ANSWER: BECAUSE IF HE PROVIDED HIS NAME AND COURT CAUSE NUMBER
________________, YOU WOULD HAVE CAUGHT HIM IN HIS LIE AND HE IS ALSO AFRAID
THAT YOU MIGHT TURN HIM IN TO THE PROSECUTOR FOR PERJURY FOR LYING AND STATING
THAT HE WAS TAKING THE RAP FOR A MARIJUANA GROWING OPERATION THAT HE WAS DOING
WITH HIS SON WHOM HE DENIED IN COURT HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THE POT GROW.
FINALLY, this . . . LIAR . . . on . . . THE RIP OFF
REPORT NEVER paid me to do an APPEAL BRIEF!!!!
I would NOT be in the least bit surprised to find out that liar named Russell
Guillemot is most probably . . . A JEW!!!!
The 1599 Geneva Bible and the King James Bible says at REVELATIONS chapter 2
verse 9 says:
“I know thy works and tribulation, and poverty (but thou art rich) and I
know the blasphemy of them, which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the
Synagogue of Satan.” Revelations 2:9
“Behold, I will make them of the Synagogue of Satan, which call
themselves Jews, and are not, but do lie: behold, I say, I will make them
that they shall come and worship before thy feet, and shall know that I have
loved thee.” Revelations 3:9
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will
do: he hath been a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, then speaketh
of he of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.” John
8:44
If someone . . . QUITS AT THE 50 YARD LINE . . . and decides . . . NOT TO
APPEAL, is that . . . MY FAULT THAT THEY LOST????
I DON’T THINK SO!!!!
BILL BLAUER OF CREDIT WRENCH has also posted FALSE COMPLAINTS about me using MY
GOOD NAME in an attempt to bring himself more business for his amateurish
beginner credit repair web site.
However, please also NOTICE that BILL BLAUER also completely fails to provide
us ANY NAMES of any defendant’s!!!!!
Please also NOTICE that BILL BLAUER also completely failed to provide us with
any COURT CASE NUMBERS _____________________?????
BILL BLAUER IS A LIAR WHO JUST EXPECTS YOU TO TAKE HIS WORD FOR IT????
I would NOT be the least bit surprised to find out that Bill Blauer is probably
. . . A JEW!!!!
The 1599 Geneva Bible and the King James Bible says at REVELATIONS chapter 2
verse 9 says:
“I know thy works and tribulation, and poverty (but thou art rich) and I
know the blasphemy of them, which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the
Synagogue of Satan.” Revelations 2:9
“Behold, I will make them of the Synagogue of Satan, which call
themselves Jews, and are not, but do lie: behold, I say, I will make them
that they shall come and worship before thy feet, and shall know that I have
loved thee.” Revelations 3:9
BRIAN KEITH at telephone: 1 - (815) 978-0592 or E-Mail to: <brian...@icglp.com>
or <brianmeyer (at) icglp.com>
who is part of the . . . <UCC-RED...@yahoogroups.com>
is 1 PISSED OFF SO CALLED JEW . . . who has cut and pasted THE FALSE COMPLAINT
that was posted about me on THE RIP OFF REPORT and posted it on the . . . <UCC-RED...@yahoogroups.com>
without verifying or confirming with me whether it was true or FALSE, which
anyone with . . . HALF A BRAIN . . . could easily figure out was and is . . . A
FALSE COMPLAINT . . . which proves that he BRIAN KEITH . . . like . . . ALL
JEWS . . . are in fact . . . PATHOLOGICAL LIARS . . . just like his father the
devil as is clearly stated in the bible at John 8:44 which reads:
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will
do: he hath been a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, then speaketh
of he of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.” John
8:44
YOU KNOW WHAT THEY SAY: “BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER”!!!!
ANY YAHOO GROUPS THAT KICKS ME OFF OF THEIR GROUP FOR POSTING OR ATTEMPTING TO
POST THIS MESSAGE WILL BE EXPOSED AND POSTED ON EVERY OTHER YAHOO GROUP ON THE
INTERNET AS SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF THE VIPER WHO ARE MISQUOTING AND MISSTATING
THE LAW ON PURPOSE TO GET REAL PATRIOTS IN TROUBLE THUS HELPING THE
GOVERNMENT!!!!
THE BIBLE SAYS NOT TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS!!!!
THE BIBLE SAYS TO PUT DOWN EVIL AND THAT IS WHAT I AM DOING!!!!
THE TRUTH IS THAT IN . . . “12 TO 15 YEARS OF HELPING PEOPLE” . .
. I HAVE HAD LESS THAN 6 COMPLAINTS, ALL OF WHICH I HAVE PROVEN TO BE
100% FALSE!
Some people got scared of the judges and caved in to their demands to get an
attorney!
Is is my fault when you quit me and hire an attorney????
YOU CAN’T WALK BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE AND PLAY IT SAFE!!!!!
YOU EITHER HAVE TO STICK WITH ME ALL THE WAY OR STICK WITH THE ATTORNEYS AND
SEE WHAT KIND OF . . . JUSTUS YOU WILL GET!!!!!
Furthermore, NOT 1 of the 6 FALSE COMPLAINERS ever paid me to write an
APPELLATE LEVEL BRIEF!!!!
Is it . . . MY FAULT . . . if someone . . . QUITS AT THE 50 YARD LINE????
I DON’T THINK SO, DO YOU????
NOW LETS TALK ABOUT MY WINS AND WHAT’S REAL AND WHAT I CAN DO FOR YOU!!!!
PLEASE SEND ME AN E-MAIL ASKING FOR MY LAUNDRY LIST OF DOCUMENTED WINS WHERE I
PROVIDE NAMES, PHONE NUMBERS, ADDRESSES, THE NAMES OF THE COURT AND
THE REAL COURT CASE NUMBERS TO PROVE THAT YES, I HAVE WON MANY DIFFERENT TYPES
OF SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASES ALL OVER THE UNITED STATES THAT WERE DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE AND WERE DISMISSED . . . “PRE-TRIAL.”
I AM WINNING 80% TO 90% OR BETTER OF ALL MY CASES PRE-TRIAL!!!!
WHAT ATTORNEY DO YOU KNOW WHO CAN MATCH MY WIN RATE????
CAN YOU AFFORD AN ATTORNEY WHOSE WIN RATE IS CLOSE TO MINE????
I DO NOT CLAIM TO BE PERFECT!!!!!
I MAKE MISTAKES TOO!!!!
I HAVE TO CORRECT AND RE-WRITE MY . . . “THE OLD UNION . . . versus . .
THE NEW UNION” . . . article which I wrote 5 or 7 years ago, because I
made the mistake of relying on a few quotes from . . . RICHARD MCDONALD’S
. . . materials which are incorrect. – Sorry about that!
I ALSO LOSE 10% TO 20% OF ALL MY CASES!!!!
THE ONLY REASON MY WIN RATE IS SO LOW IS BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE EITHER DON’T
HAVE THE MONEY OR ARE JUST TOO CHEAP TO PAY ME TO DO AN APPEAL BRIEF!!!!
I DO NOT GUARANTEE RESULTS, FIRST BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO GUARANTEE RESULTS IN
ANY COURT AND SECOND ARE YOU OFFERING TO PAY ME MORE MONEY THAN YOU WOULD PAY
AN ATTORNEY OR LESS MONEY, PLEASE DON’T TALK OUT OF YOUR BUTT ABOUT ANY
KIND OF GUARANTEES WHEN YOU WANT TO PAY ME LESS MONEY THAN YOU WOULD HAVE TO
PAY AN ATTORNEY!!!!
The 1 and ONLY sales pitch that I will ever give you or anyone else is that
DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR and PAGE FOR PAGE you will get a lot more and a lot better
quality legal pleadings and motions out of me than you could ever hope to get
out of any private attorney or law firm in any State!!!!
I KNOW I COULD BEAT THE IRS HANDS DOWN, BUT I AM WAITING FOR THE RIGHT CASE TO
COME ALONG!!!!
* * *
THERE IS HOPE!!!!
I will be teaching . . . 2 SEPARATE SEMINARS . . NEXT YEAR . . . or in .
. . 2012!!!!
1.) The first will be to help you correct your status so that you have
“standing” to challenge the IRS.
2.) The second will be to show you how to force the IRS to admit you
qualify and force them to change their records to show that you are a . . .
“NON-TAX PAYER.”
* * *
So if you want to have the best chance of WINNING YOUR CASE, forget about all
the BAR ASSOCIATION TAX ATTORNEYS and forget all the PAYTRIOT GURUS and . . .
TAX GURUS . . .and forget all the . . . PATRIDIOTS . . . that have GOOD
INTENTIONS, because they have NO TRACK RECORD OF WINNING ANY CASES!!!!
WINNING IS ALL THAT COUNTS PERIOD!!!!
Gods Law is the 1 and ONLY LAW that exists!!!!!
Sincerely
Luis Ewing
PS – THE 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at <http://www.americanvision.com/bibles.aspx>
at TIMOTHY Chapter 5, verse 18 says:
“18. For the Scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of
the ox that treadeth out the corn: and, the laborer is worthy of his
wages.” Timothy, 5:18.
SEE THE 2 NEW WEB SITES BY LUIS EWING:
1.) <www.luisewing.com>
2.) <www.ultimateusers.com>
– Where in the near future you will see MARIJUANA PLANTS overgrowing THE
WHITE HOUSE!!!!
1 HAVE FIVE (5) E-MAIL ADDRESS at <rcwcodebuster @ the following 5 internet
provider e-mail addresses:
a.) comcast.net>
b.) gmail.com>
c.) yahoo.com>
d.) hotmail.com>
e.) aol.com>
PLEASE DON’T FORGET TO COPY & PASTE ALL 5 OF MY E-MAIL ADDRESSES INTO
YOUR CONTACTS FOLDER IF YOU DON’T WANT MY E-MAILS TO GET ROUTED STRAIGHT
TO YOUR SPAM FOLDER BY YOUR INTERNET PROVIDER:
rcwcod...@comcast.net,
rcwcod...@gmail.com,
rcwcod...@yahoo.com,
rcwcod...@hotmail.com,
rcwcod...@aol.com,
lu...@luisewing.com
AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . .
“WITHOUT ADMISSION” . . . by the WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME
COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 38.38.256, RCW 26.25.010, RCW
26.21.005 (19)(a) and RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a), RCW 26.26.011 (19), RCW
26.27.021 (16), RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154, 18 U.S.C 1161, 18 U.S.C.
2265, 25 U.S.C. 1301, 25 U.S.C. 1903 (4), 25 U.S.C. 1903 (8), 25
U.S.C. 1911 (a)(b)(c), 25 U.S.C. 1901 -1963 (“ICWA”), 25
U.S.C. 3631, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 44 Fed. Reg. 67584 to 67595 (1979),
RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), GR 24 (b)(8),
Sections 3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881. See also CR
82.5 (a) & RCW 13.34.240.
CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This E-Mail is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C. 2521; RCW
9.73.030 (1)(a)(b); RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.52.130 and RCW
9.73.020 and is legally privileged and you do NOT have my “consent”
for forward this e-mail to anyone. The information contained in this E-Mail is
intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or
agent responsible to deliver it to the Sendee, please destroy the E-Mail after
advising by reply that you erroneously received this E-Mail. The receipt by
anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive the lawyer or
“of-counsel client privilege,” nor will it constitute a
waiver of the “work-product doctrine.” Any information
obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030; RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW
9A.52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW 9.73.050
and further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else without my express
prior “written consent” is liable for civil monetary damages under
Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and criminal penalties under RCW
9.73.080. The information contained in this transmission is privileged
and confidential and may be hazardous to your preconceptions. FREE
DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed free “only” to those specific recipients listed above
who have previously expressed an interest in receiving the information for
research and educational purposes and have made a prior request for said
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee,
the reader is hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or
duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030
(1)(a)(b)(C); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080
This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation
for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618
TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message
cannot be considered SPAM as long as it includes: 1) contact information, and
2) a way to be removed from future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has
reached you in error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the
mailing list, PLEASE SEND ME AN E-MAIL REQUESTING THAT I REMOVE YOU FROM
MY E-MAIL LIST AND I WILL REMOVE YOU WITHIN 72 HOURS FROM MY RECEIPT OF YOUR
E-MAIL although it may take me 4 to 5 days to catch up to your e-mail because I
get so many e-mail request’s for my FREE FLYERS from all over the U.S. or
please return to the below listed address asking me to remove you to Luis Ewing,
2110 150th Street East, Tacoma, Wash. 98445 or call and leave a message
with your E-Mail address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank
you!
--
Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741
Email1: rcwcod...@comcast.net
or
Email2: rcwcod...@yahoo.com
or
Email3: rcwcod...@gmail.com
or
Email4: rcwcod...@hotmail.com
Email5: rcwcod...@aol.com
