local group <lancashire-dragonflies@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.68.241.162 with SMTP id wj2mr2431560pbc.2.1342530928454;
        Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lancashire-dragonflies@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.129.226 with SMTP id nz2ls1891328pbb.5.gmail; Tue, 17 Jul
 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr2363442pbc.8.1342530928272;
        Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr2363441pbc.8.1342530928257;
        Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <colinpaulad...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oh7si281744pbb.2.2012.07.17.06.15.28
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of colinpaulad...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.53;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of colinpaulad...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=colinpaulad...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id rr13so761364pbb.12
        for <lancashire-dragonflies@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=eKUJ4RG0BFo0eQ28SO4LemEH+M47BHDpcu8xNtpb3zk=;
        b=U8N2UI7iLqBU/Ha2k5QVU31NUuIRp+kKyHJbk7MiHPtHV9uG6kF0Kos7BuuYgnyWIp
         LQjudHmZGl0FJjC33ldeY5XZ3wiwH8NRwChTo4QxLYldWx0aXVSz3eJ7Jy13qCD81J3j
         UTZ8J6+FEDiEk8Nuw57v1Djxsa6Fv1g0e6g9nDdgor/AxrVJcxpioyVdKJEmRZmy/OvZ
         cTrN4i2Lc2zPMgjTZQLHAjx+6j5CQN6NhRHeW7Er6Hr0bCR7ZXQUbCNW7yIaSs652mUi
         qnJUrzPQ+n1UC5H5SrFAk7juwUHeRSo+StNdQ0ZyXGsQwToh1Fto3gaRyIkW7BwEK6x5
         yAJg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.221.10 with SMTP id qa10mr6800800pbc.154.1342530928073;
 Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.105.6 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:15:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CABHqrU=0AhdTyWOZR5ty61Mpxs_d7iQqHGLOuOq7DHkFA5T...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Invading Yorkshire
From: Colin Adams <colinpaulad...@gmail.com>
To: lancashire-dragonflies@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff24801115a5304c50657ad

--e89a8ff24801115a5304c50657ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I just discovered that the two sites we visited on Sunday are in Yorkshire
Mid-west (VC64) according to the Watsonian vice-county boundaries shown in
Living Record. So I don't get to verify my own records in this case. I have
to send them abroad.

Anyway, I guess that answers the unasked question of the geographical scope
of this group - it must be new Lancashire rather than old Lancashire.
Furness is covered by VC69 (with Westmorland).

--e89a8ff24801115a5304c50657ad
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br>I just discovered that the two sites we visited on Sunday are in Yorksh=
ire Mid-west (VC64) according to the Watsonian vice-county boundaries shown=
 in Living Record. So I don&#39;t get to verify my own records in this case=
. I have to send them abroad.<div>
<br></div><div>Anyway, I guess that answers the unasked question of the geo=
graphical scope of this group - it must be new Lancashire rather than old L=
ancashire. Furness is covered by VC69 (with Westmorland).=C2=A0</div>

--e89a8ff24801115a5304c50657ad--