Received: by 10.52.24.68 with SMTP id s4mr15731200vdf.3.1338194859175;
        Mon, 28 May 2012 01:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lancashire-dragonflies@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.89.36 with SMTP id bl4ls2313200vdb.8.gmail; Mon, 28 May
 2012 01:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.66.137 with SMTP id f9mr328666vdt.14.1338194858940; Mon, 28
 May 2012 01:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 colinpaulad...@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=colinpaulad...@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header...@gmail.com
Received: by k5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2012 01:47:38
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 01:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHK=W5SmEUD9FSbyfc0doQRnndCowDKJfXYYDen98DrA7_ksyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f3014076-9b3d-4e0c-910f-54c1eec95427@m10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <CABHqrU=d9_Z_NBrEB2dCPwKGDuQq_JYLwa2HzEyLkCwmiNNJxA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHK=W5SmEUD9FSbyfc0doQRnndCowDKJfXYYDen98DrA7_ksyg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.52 Safari/536.5,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <3774790a-cf93-40c9-9e9b-91f577d6a840@k5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Latest ever first dragonfly
From: Colin Adams <colinpaulad...@gmail.com>
To: Lancashire dragonflies - a BDS local group <lancashire-dragonflies@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 28, 8:09=A0am, Peter Clare <peter.cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The pond usually has a few large reds - but non this year - perhaps it is
> just this pond - maybe something happened to it

Perhaps.

I would reply with a more detailed analyses of all my personal
observations in Lancashire this season, but there is a MUCH better
way.

And that is to go to http://www.livingrecord.net/ and press the Join
button. As soon as you have your id, log-in, and view the distribution
maps to see what has been recorded so far.

It will only be my records at the moment. We REALLY ought to be all
using this. After my first day of usage, I wrote to Adrian (the
developer) saying it fulfilled my every dream for a recording system.
Since then, I have thought of several new functions that would be nice
(it's even possible to improve on your wildest dreams, once you start
having them realized), only to discover that they were already
implemented.

So PLEASE, eveyone give it a try, and report back on your experiences.