Bruce LaDuke - most interesting KM expert I know in the West

[Nikolay Kryachkov]

Hi,

from Bruce's mail:

************************************

Everyone,

I'll be in Cleveland on Thursday, July 9, for a Mid-Town Brews
discussion. You can join the virtual Live Show and Chat 6PM - 7PM EST
here:
http://www.livestream.com/midtownbrews?referrer=mogulus

We will be having a dialogue about futuring, the knowledge/question
cycle, and the future of enterprise.

If you would like to attend live, see the Mid-Town Brews site for
details: http://www.midtownbrews.net/

Kind Regards,

Bruce LaDuke

Greenwood, IN


Bio Page (Includes a research overview, papers, websites)
http://hyperadvance.com/blog/?page_id=5

http://www.hyperadvance.com/Papers/Research%20Overview.pdf

*******************************
For me his most interesting points are:

By structuring questions knowledge is created

Exhaustive Questioning/
Directional Categorization
A powerful, integral method for solving any problem
or advancing any concept or discipline.

Polanyi
"We know more than we can say." (wrong)

Reasons why knowledge is tacit (by choice or
circumstance):
1. It is not created in the first place.
2. It is not expressed or poorly expressed.
3. It is not accepted.
All knowledge is logical and can be expressed or we
don’t know it. Any concept that cannot be
expressed it is a question or mass of questions.

Etc.

But I do not think that Artificial Knowledge Creation (AKC) exists,
because language is human responsibility. Therefore storage of
knowledge is problematic. Knowledge is for actions - directly humans'
or indirectly via machines. Current interest based economy doesn't see
human as Knowledge Person, it can see machines. But the machines can't
pay interest, only humans can. It's the civilization deadlock which is
being produced by the attitude to knowledge - it's about everything
except MONEY - no pluralism, democracy and other similar values here.

Nikolay