Received: by 10.43.115.73 with SMTP id fd9mr280554icc.2.1348111984817;
        Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: kc-fabricators@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.51.234 with SMTP id n10ls596247igo.3.canary; Wed, 19 Sep
 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.8.201 with SMTP id ot9mr276628icb.10.1348111984512;
        Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.8.201 with SMTP id ot9mr276627icb.10.1348111984503;
        Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <kanz...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gk9si3795988igc.2.2012.09.19.20.33.04
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kanz...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.169;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kanz...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kanz...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so1894515obh.0
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=3no9sLtBOEOSfngSjn+gjLTEpr3BBOoagK7SzlF4cB0=;
        b=vcEp5lNvLgCM5Ia8DJZhKdt6r4QXWLYt1bIC82PmnNATh7Wb38z9jyJs4IUHsqkj8H
         coCQZ1i8Liz15D1RC2zYa9PZ7XPICFUJNvaA2XhZ1Zf3hkFYCSJrmPj8/c7NuMNJSbY3
         ucAgvgQz8pBoVW7+OtRtyaVipBPKC1ReF/3VfqhBNCnROF9mL5m12cPd+Tulechaidh6
         gxr89Qr2Q1nJlSknb/GMZhj+XUalUmtAnF4E7MfrIChXeXnszHEKt1b1xQmzX6yv4ZQQ
         xPtVygUAFjKlVmoVjZK/LZusjsFKFi98XBpNVoJ4ri7fnGPENT0J0fC9GOtnuPLImeC9
         wq/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.20.234 with SMTP id q10mr313457oee.107.1348111984143; Wed,
 19 Sep 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.10.130 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <-7736553821330799308@unknownmsgid>
References: <CAApdPaTYnk+ia0qJce=nAP_pOY+j451-5HOTj48B2Z8pRR5...@mail.gmail.com>
	<-7736553821330799308@unknownmsgid>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:33:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBawvzWS2d35ikDWp9hboUn2dS0rDDOg6jJKz_vjV4h_...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kc-fabricators] Re: Is One of Our Open Source Heroes Going
 Closed Source? by Rob Giseburt
From: Bryan Bishop <kanz...@gmail.com>
To: kc-fabricators@googlegroups.com, Bryan Bishop <kanz...@gmail.com>, 
	Open Manufacturing <openmanufacturing@googlegroups.com>, Rob Giseburt <giseb...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Rob Giseburt <giseb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wish it were better circumstance to get to write for the Make blog.

IIRC, makerbot has always had one or two closed source parts. Are
people quick to forget? Prusa was mentioning the firmware as another
contender, too.

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507