Received: by 10.205.132.13 with SMTP id hs13mr671067bkc.0.1320890080891;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:54:40 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: jvm-languages@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.200.144 with SMTP id ew16ls5246666bkb.2.gmail; Wed, 09 Nov
 2011 17:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.129.8 with SMTP id m8mr669062bks.5.1320890078294;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.129.8 with SMTP id m8mr669061bks.5.1320890078277;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gcjvl-jvm-langua...@m.gmane.org>
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org. [80.91.229.12])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id h3si3571740fao.3.2011.11.09.17.54.38;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gcjvl-jvm-langua...@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.12;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcjvl-jvm-langua...@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gcjvl-jvm-langua...@m.gmane.org
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcjvl-jvm-langua...@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1ROJqf-0007O3-Dh
	for jvm-languages@googlegroups.com; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:54:37 +0100
Received: from 89.204.139.96 ([89.204.139.96])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <jvm-languages@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:54:37 +0100
Received: from lefevrol by 89.204.139.96 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <jvm-languages@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:54:37 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: jvm-languages@googlegroups.com
From: Olivier Lefevre <lefev...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Dart on JVM
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:54:17 +0100
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <4EBB2EC9.8070900@yahoo.com>
References: <4E9C93AD.3070009@univ-mlv.fr> <CAE-f1xRn1GisOX6JmKJq9UmyEnsFTGfHocDWf0yKhxqgZtxRJQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E9D3755.9030200@univ-mlv.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: use...@dough.gmane.org
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Forax?=
 <public-forax-TRAJqka12BNWj0EZb7r...@lo.gmane.org>
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.204.139.96
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To: <4E9D3755.9030...@univ-mlv.fr>

On 10/18/2011 10:22 AM, R�mi Forax wrote:
 >> Awesome work Remi...maybe more people will start to realize what power we have in invokedynamic.
 >
 > shh, I prefer to think I'm awesome :)
 > invokedynamic() => merge(swiss_knife, ligth_saber);

So, is it invokedynamic that made such a fast turnaround possible or your own considerable
experience with language implementation on the JVM (this must be your 3rd or 4th)?

Regards,

-- O.L.