Hi Josh,
I find the statement you use problematic in a couple of ways. One, sponsorship is a way for nonprofit entities to wean themselves from foundation support. Nonprofit doesn't mean not making money. Many institutions have been able to provide firewalls between
their editorial functions and their financial supporters. A statement that clearly asks for there to be division of labor would suffice to ensure editorial isn't tainted (in an ideal world of course.)
The second phrase about devoting significant resources to producing coverage that might be regularly produced by most commercial news media, seems problematic as well. Many hyperlocals jump into spaces previously occupied by commercial media, either because
they are neglecting certain communities or populations or topics within their coverage area. The qualifier, "daily or near-daily" might help, but it seems that this would be well nigh impossible to monitor or distinguish for a hyperlocal operating within a
market already served by a commercial media interest. Or for a topical site that covers an area largely ignored by mainstream media.
So by my interpretation, you've stifled the ability to make money and to create content for just the types of projects that would most need fiscal sponsorship.
Have you asked the Online Media Legal Network to help you with a statement?
http://www.omln.org/
Hope this helps!
Michelle Ferrier, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Elon University School of Communications
Founder and Publisher, LocallyGrownNews.com