Thanks for forwarding this info Noah! Reading the info in the About section, GoLocal looks like it has been logically thought out and has a reasonable business plan going for it. I don't think it could have got that much VC money if it didn't. Must also have a solid exit strategy too.
Although I think the whole "compete with the local paper" thing isn't necessarily the way to go.....
I don't know but every time I looked at what Patch was/is doing, it seemed like a lot of "throw it on the wall and see if it sticks" kind of thing. I know one town in California that has a very seasoned editor who's done hyperlocal, and that one will probably succeed. Then there are others that were
staffed primarily with who we might call "the enthusiastic"--who may or may not have been able to engage enough of the citizenry to keep things going.
I have the sneaking suspicion that Patch will be folded into HufPo, which just purchased a piece of software called Localocracy (it was developed in Amherst, and I'm familiar with one of the VCs on that one) that spurs "conversation" (supposedly) I believe that this will be behind something called HuffPo Local. The Patch folks who were successful may end up as part of HuffPo Local, or not. HuffPo's been running a lot of "experiments" over the years, testing the boundaries to see how much reporting people are willing to do for no money.
just a couple of thoughts on that....
Tish G.