JSON Schema Google Group

Re: Largish corpus of test schema?

2009-12-28T06:02:29Z

On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:08 AM, James Newton-King
Absolutely. Same actually also goes for basic JSON documents too; I
haven't heard of anything similar to what is available for xml
(xmltest and others).
-+ Tatu +-

Re: Largish corpus of test schema?

2009-12-27T10:08:02Z

+1
A suite of test cases would be extremely helpful for anyone who
actually wants to do anything with JSON Schema in the real world.

Re: A holiday present: the JSONSchema / Orderly cross compiler in ANSI C

2009-12-23T19:24:24Z

Hey Rusco,
The compiler is indeed written in C. This compiler will become a full
scale validator. The benefit of this is that a single implementation
can be used in a multitude of languages.
I expect that if orderly actually proves useful we'll see a native
Javascript implementation, but there probably will be some feedback

Re: A holiday present: the JSONSchema / Orderly cross compiler in ANSI C

2009-12-23T14:17:24Z

Are you talking about the validator, or compiler between Orderly <->
JSON Schema. If you are talking about the compiler I would have to
disagree that it is better that it be written in JS.
How this would be used, say you already have a JSON Schema so you
would compile it once into orderly (and possibly never again), then

Re: A holiday present: the JSONSchema / Orderly cross compiler in ANSI C

2009-12-23T13:26:18Z

This looks very promising !!
But: Why do you do this in C ? I would rather prefer to have a
javascript implementation for this (better: jQuery plugin).
My 2 cents
Rusco

Re: A holiday present: the JSONSchema / Orderly cross compiler in ANSI C

2009-12-23T09:24:57Z

twitted for italian nerds [link]
On Dec 23, 5:41 am, Ganesh and Sashi Prasad <g.c.pra...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Re: A holiday present: the JSONSchema / Orderly cross compiler in ANSI C

2009-12-23T04:41:17Z

Thanks Lloyd, blogged<[link]>
.
Ganesh
2009/12/23 Lloyd Hilaiel <llo...@gmail.com>

A holiday present: the JSONSchema / Orderly cross compiler in ANSI C

2009-12-23T03:44:08Z

Hi all,
A while ago I proposed "orderly", a small textual complement to
JSONSchema. If you recall, we were talking about a language that
could roundtrip to and from JSONSchema.
A very early, but complete, first version of that compiler is done and
you can try it out here:
[link]
Though it's not documented, there's a little web services api

Discussion on json-schema-implementations

2009-12-22T15:04:03Z

Here is another Java one [link]

Self-defined Schema

2009-12-21T14:52:27Z

Greetings,
Very new to json schema. I was wondering if the spec allows multiple
'$schema' attributes? The php version of the validator seems to be
complaining about the following:
{
"$schema" : {
"properties" : {
"name" : {
"type" : "string"
},
"age" : {
"type" : "number",
"maximum" : 125,

Re: passing value by URI reference

2009-12-14T16:03:18Z

JSON referencing [1] has been used for a while and serves this purpose,
but actually JSON Schema now supercedes JSON referencing as it defines
how to do hyperlinks in JSON, see section 6 in the draft [2]. It looks
fjord also provides additional functionality for rule matching that is
beyond the scope of JSON schema and hyperlinking (but may very well be

Re: the latest on Extending and Referencing

2009-12-14T15:52:06Z

The Internet Draft does supercede the prior draft that is at
[link] (actually I should copy the I-D to
[link]), but the intention is that conventions from the
prior draft at [link] should now become normative with
the JSON schema link definitions in combination with the normative

passing value by URI reference

2009-12-14T09:53:10Z

Hi,

I have a question not directly related to JSON Schema but hopefully some
of JSON experts can help me.
Is there any widely-used/preferred way to refer to an attribute value
via URI reference (URI of resource containing attribute value)?
The way I'm looking for should support both pass-by-value or

Re: an alternative to existing means of union specification

2009-12-13T21:13:43Z

Nope, actually it's me who missed something this time. You're correct that
my example could be expressed as you point out.
I can't really think of a good reason for having this ability either. I
think the only reason that this is the case is that it allows all schemas to
be constrained by the same rules. I would think this would make it easier

the latest on Extending and Referencing

2009-12-13T17:55:40Z

hi again,

what is the status of the "Extending and Referencing" ideas here:
[link]

as related to the published draft: [link]

Is it that the ideas expressed in the former are wholly non-normative
conventions on top of the latter?